This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/sci/tech/6224859.stm
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Stars must 'check science facts' | Stars must 'check science facts' |
(about 8 hours later) | |
Celebrities have been asked to check their facts before lending support to scientific research and campaigns, rather than risk misleading people. | Celebrities have been asked to check their facts before lending support to scientific research and campaigns, rather than risk misleading people. |
Some celebrity-backed campaigns have done more harm than good, such as linking the MMR jab to autism, says the charity Sense About Science. | |
The group has listed statements made by stars on topics such as organic food, pesticides and ways to avoid cancer. | The group has listed statements made by stars on topics such as organic food, pesticides and ways to avoid cancer. |
It adds scientists' views on whether the claims are misleading. | It adds scientists' views on whether the claims are misleading. |
The list is contained in a pamphlet which is being distributed to VIP clubs and restaurants across the UK, as well as management agencies and publishers. | The list is contained in a pamphlet which is being distributed to VIP clubs and restaurants across the UK, as well as management agencies and publishers. |
It offers advice such as "if it sounds too good to be true, it usually is", and lists a phone number for concerned celebrities to call if they want to discuss anything with experts. | It offers advice such as "if it sounds too good to be true, it usually is", and lists a phone number for concerned celebrities to call if they want to discuss anything with experts. |
'A fair bit of nonsense' | |
Sense About Science director Tracey Brown told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the claims made ranged from "the weird and the wacky" to more serious issues. | |
Scientists, traditionally a quiet bunch, are now trying to redress the balance and finding ways of promoting fact over misinformation Illusionist Derren Brown | Scientists, traditionally a quiet bunch, are now trying to redress the balance and finding ways of promoting fact over misinformation Illusionist Derren Brown |
"There is a real problem when people present things as though they are scientifically grounded," she said. | |
"There is always going to be a fair bit of nonsense around, and particularly with the big interest in lifestyle." | |
Ms Brown added: "We are saying, 'Before you go public, check your facts'. All it takes is a phone call to us. | |
"We have over 1,400 scientists who are committed to helping improve public debate. | |
"We also have many of the medical research charities and the scientific societies who would much rather have a phone call and spend a bit of time than have to chase after trying to undo some misinformation to the public." | |
One celebrity who is backing the campaign is illusionist Derren Brown. He said: "We are more than aware that the media prefer a shocking story over delicate fact. | One celebrity who is backing the campaign is illusionist Derren Brown. He said: "We are more than aware that the media prefer a shocking story over delicate fact. |
"In areas like food, environment and medicine, this can have serious results," he added. | "In areas like food, environment and medicine, this can have serious results," he added. |
"Scientists, traditionally a quiet bunch, are now trying to redress the balance and finding ways of promoting fact over misinformation." | "Scientists, traditionally a quiet bunch, are now trying to redress the balance and finding ways of promoting fact over misinformation." |
In November, Lord Rees, president of the Royal Society, called on the scientific community to become more involved in public debates about their research. | In November, Lord Rees, president of the Royal Society, called on the scientific community to become more involved in public debates about their research. |
He added that there was a tendency for minority "strident" views to get exaggerated, leading to an unbalanced debate. | He added that there was a tendency for minority "strident" views to get exaggerated, leading to an unbalanced debate. |
Professor John Toy of Cancer Research UK said: "Celebrities often have a real effect on how members of the public view particular issues, especially health and lifestyle. | |
"They have a major responsibility, therefore, to be well informed before they make statements endorsing particular treatments of products so as not mistakenly to mislead people." |
Previous version
1
Next version