This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/london/7877596.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Parking fine man receives £20,000 Parking fine man received £20,000
(about 8 hours later)
A man was awarded £20,000 in damages after claiming he was distressed by parking fines totalling £200.A man was awarded £20,000 in damages after claiming he was distressed by parking fines totalling £200.
Z-Un Noon, from Tower Hamlets, east London, refused to pay four £50 fines to Newham Council and took the council to court claiming emotional distress.Z-Un Noon, from Tower Hamlets, east London, refused to pay four £50 fines to Newham Council and took the council to court claiming emotional distress.
When a council representative failed to appear Mr Noon was given judgement by default and awarded £5,000 per ticket.When a council representative failed to appear Mr Noon was given judgement by default and awarded £5,000 per ticket.
A council spokeswoman said it had not received the court summons. Last month Mr Noon was ordered to repay the money. The council said it had not received the court summons and Mr Noon has since been ordered to repay the £20,000.
The council initially fined Mr Noon £50 for committing a parking offence in October 2007.The council initially fined Mr Noon £50 for committing a parking offence in October 2007.
After he refused to pay, the council enlisted the help of bailiffs and the case was closed.After he refused to pay, the council enlisted the help of bailiffs and the case was closed.
Computers seizedComputers seized
However, when Mr Noon received a further three parking fines he pursued damages for emotional distress in county court.However, when Mr Noon received a further three parking fines he pursued damages for emotional distress in county court.
The court ruled in his favour in the council's absence, and bailiffs were sent to retrieve the £20,000 from the council.The court ruled in his favour in the council's absence, and bailiffs were sent to retrieve the £20,000 from the council.
"We first heard about the case when bailiffs came into our parking shop in East Ham," said the council's spokeswoman.
"They began to unplug our computers and take them away. We agreed to pay them to prevent them unplugging an important file server."
This was just an abuse of the whole legal system Newham CouncilThis was just an abuse of the whole legal system Newham Council
"We first heard about the case when bailiffs came into our parking shop in East Ham," said a council spokeswoman.
"They began to unplug our computers and take them away. We agreed to pay them to prevent them unplugging an important file server."
She added: "If we had been aware of the case, of course we would have made representations in court. We would not have just ignored something like this."She added: "If we had been aware of the case, of course we would have made representations in court. We would not have just ignored something like this."
Last month Bow County Court ruled in the council's favour and Mr Noon has been ordered to repay the £20,000 plus £7,500 in costs. However, last month Bow County Court ruled in the council's favour and Mr Noon has now been ordered to repay the £20,000 plus £7,500 in costs.
"There is a standard procedure for challenging parking fines," the council spokeswoman said."There is a standard procedure for challenging parking fines," the council spokeswoman said.
"This was just an abuse of the whole legal system.""This was just an abuse of the whole legal system."