This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7876425.stm
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Ecstasy 'not worse than riding' | Ecstasy 'not worse than riding' |
(3 days later) | |
Taking the drug ecstasy is no more dangerous than riding a horse, a senior adviser has suggested. | |
Professor David Nutt, chairman of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD), outlined his view in the Journal of Psychopharmacology. | Professor David Nutt, chairman of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD), outlined his view in the Journal of Psychopharmacology. |
The council, which advises the government, is expected next week to recommend that ecstasy is downgraded from a class A drug to a class B one. | The council, which advises the government, is expected next week to recommend that ecstasy is downgraded from a class A drug to a class B one. |
Ministers have outlined their opposition to any such move. | Ministers have outlined their opposition to any such move. |
Professor Nutt wrote: "Drug harm can be equal to harms in other parts of life. There is not much difference between horse-riding and ecstasy." | Professor Nutt wrote: "Drug harm can be equal to harms in other parts of life. There is not much difference between horse-riding and ecstasy." |
Organ failure | Organ failure |
The professor said horse-riding accounted for more than 100 deaths a year, and went on: "This attitude raises the critical question of why society tolerates - indeed encourages - certain forms of potentially harmful behaviour but not others such as drug use." | The professor said horse-riding accounted for more than 100 deaths a year, and went on: "This attitude raises the critical question of why society tolerates - indeed encourages - certain forms of potentially harmful behaviour but not others such as drug use." |
Professor Nutt's academic work does not prejudice that which he conducts as chair of the ACMD ACMD spokesman | Professor Nutt's academic work does not prejudice that which he conducts as chair of the ACMD ACMD spokesman |
Ecstasy use is linked to around 30 deaths a year, up from 10 a year in the early 1990s. Fatalities are caused by massive organ failure from overheating or the effects of drinking too much water. | Ecstasy use is linked to around 30 deaths a year, up from 10 a year in the early 1990s. Fatalities are caused by massive organ failure from overheating or the effects of drinking too much water. |
The ACMD last night distanced itself from Prof Nutt's comments. | The ACMD last night distanced itself from Prof Nutt's comments. |
A spokesman for the body said: "The recent article by Professor David Nutt published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology was done in respect of his academic work and not as chair of the ACMD. | A spokesman for the body said: "The recent article by Professor David Nutt published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology was done in respect of his academic work and not as chair of the ACMD. |
"Professor Nutt's academic work does not prejudice that which he conducts as chair of the ACMD." | "Professor Nutt's academic work does not prejudice that which he conducts as chair of the ACMD." |
'No safe dose' | 'No safe dose' |
David Raynes, of the National Drug Prevention Alliance, told the Daily Telegraph: "He is entitled to his personal opinion, but if his personal view conflicts so very strongly with his public duties, it would be honourable to consider his position. | David Raynes, of the National Drug Prevention Alliance, told the Daily Telegraph: "He is entitled to his personal opinion, but if his personal view conflicts so very strongly with his public duties, it would be honourable to consider his position. |
"If he does not, the home secretary should do it for him." | "If he does not, the home secretary should do it for him." |
Last September a Home Office spokesman said the government believed ecstasy should remain a Class A drug. | Last September a Home Office spokesman said the government believed ecstasy should remain a Class A drug. |
"Ecstasy can and does kill unpredictably. There is no such thing as a 'safe dose'," he said. | "Ecstasy can and does kill unpredictably. There is no such thing as a 'safe dose'," he said. |