This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/13/world/middleeast/israel-pompeo-annexation-netanyahu.html

The article has changed 32 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Pompeo in Israel for Meetings on Annexation, Virus, Iran and China On Annexation, a Green Light Turns Yellow, Pompeo’s Visit to Israel Signals
(32 minutes later)
JERUSALEM — With Israel preparing to annex territory in the occupied West Bank and a flurry of clashes claiming the lives of an Israeli soldier and a Palestinian teenager, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo arrived in Jerusalem on Wednesday promising to push ahead with the Trump administration’s proposal to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. JERUSALEM — Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s eight-hour visit to Jerusalem on Wednesday for a lightning round of meetings with Israeli leaders raised one question that no one involved got around to answering:
“There remains work yet to do, and we need to make progress on it,” Mr. Pompeo said of the administration’s “vision for peace” at the start of a lightning-quick, eight-hour visit. It was the first official trip to Israel by any country’s diplomats since the coronavirus pandemic shunted face-to-face meetings onto videoconferences. What was so urgent and sensitive, in the middle of a virus pandemic, that America’s top diplomat had to make a 16-hour trip to Israel instead of simply picking up the phone?
Mr. Pompeo, who disembarked from his jet wearing a red, white and blue mask, also addressed efforts to fight the coronavirus and to stop Iran’s nuclear project and contain its expansionist moves in the Middle East. A key, officials and experts said, was in the timing. It came on the eve of Israel’s seating its new government, one that appears divided over the immediacy of annexing about 30 percent of the occupied West Bank, which the Palestinians have counted on for a future state. And it came as the Trump administration is facing growing pressure from Arab leaders across the Middle East to pump the brakes on Israel’s annexation plans.
But in brief remarks alongside Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Mr. Pompeo, no longer wearing his mask, revealed that China, a rare sore spot between the United States and Israel, was also very much on the agenda. Although Mr. Pompeo took pains to avoid publicly addressing annexation, analysts suggested that a goal of the trip was to caution Israel’s leadership against moving too quickly.
“You’re a great partner,” Mr. Pompeo said to Mr. Netanyahu. “You share information, unlike some other countries that try and obfuscate and hide information. We’ll talk about that country, too.” Mr. Pompeo met first with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had campaigned on a promise to push ahead with annexation as soon as possible, and later with Benny Gantz, alternate prime minister in the new government, who had campaigned against unilateral annexation.
Mr. Pompeo and Mr. Trump have engaged in a war of words with China over its handling of the virus outbreak that first emerged in the Chinese city of Wuhan, giving credence to suggestions that the virus originated in a government laboratory, which the Chinese have vehemently denied and virologists have widely discounted. Without explicitly suggesting that Mr. Netanyahu and Mr. Gantz slow the process, Mr. Pompeo seemed to signal as much, telling Israel Hayom, a pro-Netanyahu newspaper, that Mr. Netanyahu and Mr. Gantz “will have to find the way forward together.”
Last week, Mr. Pompeo said China “could have prevented the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people worldwide” and “spared the world descent into global economic malaise.” He added, “China is still refusing to share the information we need to keep people safe.” Mr. Gantz, a former army chief who ran against Mr. Netanyahu, agreed last month to join a unity government with him to battle the coronavirus epidemic. But their power-sharing agreement did not give Mr. Gantz a veto over annexation as his supporters had hoped. Instead, it requires only that Mr. Gantz be consulted.
But Mr. Pompeo’s pointed reference to China in Mr. Netanyahu’s presence was not just a surprising attempt to draw Israel into a venomous dispute on the American side; it was also a thinly veiled allusion to a source of growing friction between Israel and the United States. “To the extent that in the coalition agreement, Gantz waived his veto right over annexation, Pompeo is handing it back to him,” said Ofer Zalzberg, a senior analyst at the International Crisis Group. “Pompeo is giving him leverage over it, influence over it.”
If the United States, with President Trump’s peace proposal, gave Mr. Netanyahu a green light on annexation, it may have now changed to yellow.
Dennis Ross, who helped negotiate earlier peace plans during the Clinton administration, noted signs of “a certain pause” in the Trump administration’s approach after a series of diplomatic maneuvers that appeared designed to pressure Palestinian officials into new talks with Israel.
Notably, Mr. Ross said, leaders of neighboring Arab states are urging the Trump administration to withhold its approval of West Bank annexation — arguing that it would upend regional security agreements, create a new influx of Palestinians into Jordan and, in the end, scuttle any hope for future negotiations.
“A number of them are weighing in and saying, ‘Don’t do this — or at least, certainly don’t rush to do this,’” said Mr. Ross, who said he has been talking with Arab and Israeli officials.
Mr. Pompeo himself seemed to allude to the possibility that immediate annexation could derail the Trump administration’s “vision for peace,” its blueprint for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Asked about annexation, he told Israel Hayom, “We spoke of ways to advance the peace plan, Trump’s peace plan.”
“We did not discuss only the matter of annexation,” he continued, “but how to act with various relevant stakeholders, and how one can ensure the move is done in an adequate manner so as to bring a result in line with the vision for peace.”
Mr. Netanyahu, who did not mention the peace plan in his appearance with Mr. Pompeo, had reserved the right in the coalition agreement to take up annexation after July 1.
In Washington, Trump administration officials downplayed the significance of that date, noting that annexation could well be delayed. A senior State Department official told reporters traveling with Mr. Pompeo that “it’s going to take a while” for the Israeli government “to come together with what they’re going to do” on the administration’s peace plan.
The State Department official also said that Israel was well aware of the concerns that annexation had raised with neighboring Arab states, and was dealing with them in a “savvy” way. The official briefed reporters on condition of anonymity due to department protocols.
Should Mr. Gantz and Gabi Ashkenazi, who is to become foreign minister and is also a former army chief, speak out forcefully against annexation on security grounds, that could pose a political problem for the Trump administration, analysts said. The administration could be seen as taking sides with Israel’s extreme right in ways that the former military men, whose views are considered more mainstream, could argue jeopardize Israel’s safety.
But Mr. Ross said the Trump administration could claim a modicum of success — and appease evangelicals and right-wing Jewish voters in the United States whose support for President Trump is crucial in November — if its long-running pressure campaign against the Palestinians pays off.
In that scenario, Mr. Ross said, Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority president, would rejoin the negotiations with a counterproposal to the annexation map.
The Trump administration “could say, ‘Hey, look, everybody claimed this wouldn’t happen and it has happened,’” Mr. Ross said. “‘So we’ve been successful in ways that others haven’t been.’”
Opponents of annexation have generally taken a much dimmer view, warning that it would kill any chance of a two-state solution to the long-running conflict and set off violence that could quickly lead to the collapse of the Palestinian Authority, which governs the West Bank under the Oslo accords.
There have already been signs this week of an uptick in violence: On Tuesday, an Israeli soldier was killed when a heavy rock thrown from a house near the northern West Bank city of Jenin struck him in the head.
Then, even as the hunt for his killer or killers continued, a Palestinian teenager, Zaid Qaisiyya, was shot in the head and killed early Wednesday in clashes with Israeli security forces in the Fawar refugee camp near the southern West Bank city of Hebron. The boy’s funeral drew a crowd of thousands.
A State Department official said the issue of annexation was not the trip’s main focus: Mr. Pompeo and Mr. Netanyahu also discussed two other urgent issues, threats from Iran and business dealings with China.
Israeli reports have attributed a cyberattack last month to Iran, although without offering any public evidence. The strike aimed at the controls for Israel’s national water system at a time when citizens were confined to their homes.
The two men also grappled with friction over China, whose major infrastructure investments in Israel have raised concerns among American officials on national security grounds.
In their brief public remarks, Mr. Pompeo appeared at one point to try to draw Mr. Netanyahu into the Trump administration’s war of words with China over the coronavirus.
Mr. Pompeo and Mr. Trump have assailed China over its handling of the virus outbreak that first emerged in the city of Wuhan. Last week, Mr. Pompeo said China “could have prevented the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people worldwide” and “spared the world descent into global economic malaise,” adding, “China is still refusing to share the information we need to keep people safe.”
On Wednesday, Mr. Pompeo told Mr. Netanyahu, “You’re a great partner. You share information, unlike some other countries that try and obfuscate and hide information.”
But Mr. Pompeo’s reference to China was also a thinly veiled allusion to a bone of contention between Israel and the United States.
Israel has antagonized Washington by allowing Chinese companies to make major infrastructure investments in recent years, including in sensitive locations.Israel has antagonized Washington by allowing Chinese companies to make major infrastructure investments in recent years, including in sensitive locations.
In Haifa, a company majority-owned by the Chinese government has struck a 25-year lease to run Israel’s commercial seaport beginning in 2021; it is a frequent port of call for the United States Navy’s Sixth Fleet. And in another strategic spot near Israel’s Palmachim air force base, a Hong Kong-based company, Hutchison Water International, is a finalist to build a desalination plant that Israel says will be the largest in the world. The winner of the contract is scheduled to be announced on May 24. A company majority-owned by the Chinese government has signed a 25-year lease to run Israel’s commercial seaport in Haifa, a frequent port of call for the United States Navy, beginning in 2021. And in another strategic spot near Israel’s Palmachim air force base, a Hong Kong-based company, Hutchison Water International, is a finalist to build a desalination plant that Israel says will be the largest in the world.
Trump administration officials have clamored for Israel to screen and monitor such investments by China more carefully, with the energy secretary, Dan Brouillette, warning in a visit to Israel last year that intelligence sharing between the two allies could otherwise be impaired or compromised. Trump administration officials have clamored for Israel to screen and monitor such investments by China more carefully, with Energy Secretary Dan Brouillette warning in a visit to Israel last year that intelligence sharing could be impaired or compromised.
Standing alongside Mr. Pompeo on Wednesday, however, Mr. Netanyahu appeared to gently but firmly push back, reminding him where much of the intelligence that the two allies share actually originates. Standing alongside Mr. Pompeo on Wednesday, however, Mr. Netanyahu appeared to gently push back, reminding him where much of the intelligence that the two allies share actually originates.
“The most important thing is actually generating the information and then sharing the information,” Mr. Netanyahu interrupted Mr. Pompeo to say, an unmistakable reference to the Israeli intelligence services’ track record of developing information of value to the United States. “The most important thing is actually generating the information, and then sharing the information,” Mr. Netanyahu said, an unmistakable reference to the Israeli intelligence services’ track record of developing information of value to the United States.
Notably, Mr. Pompeo’s short schedule of meetings included a session with the Mossad director, Yossi Cohen.
Mr. Pompeo also met with Benny Gantz, the former army chief who fought Mr. Netanyahu to a draw in three elections over the past year and a half before agreeing to join him in an emergency unity government.
When they are sworn in on Thursday — an event that was pushed back by a day because of Mr. Pompeo’s visit — Mr. Gantz is to become defense minister but, more important, will hold the title of alternate prime minister and will have veto power over most major decisions. He will not have the ability to block an annexation move, however. Under their unusual arrangement, Mr. Gantz is to take over as prime minister in 18 months.
Mr. Pompeo also met with Gabi Ashkenazi, another former army chief and an ally of Mr. Gantz’s who is to become foreign minister in the new government.
Mr. Netanyahu’s vow to annex West Bank territory that the Palestinians have long counted on for a future state loomed largest over Mr. Pompeo’s visit.
Opponents of annexation have warned that it would kill the chance of a two-state solution to the long-running conflict and would spark violence that could quickly lead to the collapse of the Palestinian Authority, which governs the West Bank under the Oslo accords.
On Tuesday, an Israeli soldier was killed when a heavy rock thrown from a house near the northern West Bank city of Jenin struck him in the head. Even as the hunt for his killer or killers continued, a Palestinian teenager, Zaid Qaisiyya, was shot in the head and killed early Wednesday in clashes with Israeli security forces in the Fawar refugee camp near the southern West Bank city of Hebron. Four others were wounded by live fire, the official Palestinian news agency Wafa reported. The boy’s funeral drew a crowd of thousands.
The State Department has in recent weeks sought to downplay the Trump administration’s role in shaping Israel’s annexation plans. “That’s an Israeli decision,” Mr. Pompeo said in April.
But a mapping committee of American and Israeli officials — not including Palestinian leaders — is drawing the boundaries of the roughly 30 percent of West Bank territory that is expected to be annexed.
Ambassador David M. Friedman, the American envoy to Jerusalem, sits on that panel, but he skipped Wednesday’s meeting with Mr. Pompeo after experiencing “mild upper-respiratory symptoms,” though he tested negative for Covid-19, the disease caused by the virus, the United States Embassy said.
Supporters of a two-state solution have been busy both predicting and trying to ensure a painful backlash for Israel if it moves ahead with annexation. Doing so unilaterally would not only jeopardize Israel’s security pacts with Egypt and Jordan; it could also alienate some of Israel’s trading partners and potentially induce European sanctions, opponents warn.
On Friday, the European Union’s Foreign Affairs Council is expected to discuss Israel’s plans to declare sovereignty over West Bank territory and how Europe might respond. The E.U.’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, last month maintained that annexation of Palestinian territories would be a “serious violation” of international law and said that European diplomats were prepared to “act accordingly.”
Still, only the United States is likely to be able to dissuade Israel, said Israela Oron, a retired Israeli general and two-state solution supporter. But she said that was unlikely, given how much President Trump depends on votes in November from American evangelists and right-wing Jewish voters, who support Israel’s takeover of the West Bank on religious grounds.
“The question is ‘How come annexation is so urgent in the middle of the corona pandemic and the economic crisis?’” Ms. Oron said in an online session with journalists held on Tuesday by the left-of-center Israel Policy Forum. “The simple answer is the upcoming election in the U.S.”
Even American lawmakers who oppose annexation indicated there was little they could do to stop it. “Many of us are urging the Israeli government, ‘Don’t do this — if you do this, we view it as nearly fatal to peace prospects,’” Senator Tim Kaine, Democrat of Virginia, said on Tuesday as Mr. Pompeo was flying to Israel.
Mr. Kaine sidestepped questions on whether a Democratic administration could roll back an Israeli annexation if Mr. Trump leaves office in January. But he suggested that at least some American aid to Israel could be cut.
“At the end of the day, Congress can’t completely be the protector of somebody that, frankly, is not willing to protect themselves,” Mr. Kaine said. He added: “I just don’t know that this idea of ‘We’ll protect you, even including against your own steps that have made you less safe.’ I don’t think that guarantee goes on forever.”
David M. Halbfinger reported from Jerusalem, and Lara Jakes from Washington. Adam Rasgon contributed reporting from Tel Aviv.David M. Halbfinger reported from Jerusalem, and Lara Jakes from Washington. Adam Rasgon contributed reporting from Tel Aviv.