This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/7852546.stm

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Campaigners lose eco-towns fight Campaigners lose eco-towns appeal
(20 minutes later)
Campaigners have lost a High Court challenge to the government's plans to build several eco-towns. Campaigners have lost a High Court challenge to the government's plans to build up to 10 eco-towns.
Campaigners from Warwickshire, Worcestershire and Oxfordshire applied last week for a judicial review of the scheme, arguing it was legally flawed. Campaigners from Warwickshire, Worcestershire and Oxfordshire applied for a judicial review of the scheme, arguing it was legally flawed.
They urged the court to stop the project until there had been a "proper and full consultation process". But the government says it has "acted properly throughout this process".
Twelve sites in England are on the shortlist to be eco-towns - the first new English towns since the 1960s. Twelve sites in England are on the shortlist to be eco-towns. These - the first new towns since the 1960s - are due to be built over the next decade.
Planning process
The legal challenge was brought by the Better Accessible Responsible Development (Bard) campaign, which is opposed to 6,000 new homes being built at Middle Qunton near Long Marston on the Worcestershire/Warwickshire borders.
It was backed by the Weston Front Protest Group, which opposes plans for 15,000 homes at the Weston Otmoor site, near Bicester in Oxfordshire.
Ministers seem intent on ignoring the voice of local people Grant Shapps, Conservative
David Bliss, chairman of the Bard campaign, said after the ruling: "We are disappointed but this is by no means the end of the road for Bard's challenges to the Middle Quinton proposal.
"Labelling objectors Nimbies (Not in My Back Yard) is a lazy government response to a well thought-out opposition to the current eco-town programme.
"No less than 47 national, regional and local representative bodies agree that poorly sited new towns will neither meet their promised eco-agenda nor provide affordable housing in places where people want to live."
Eco-towns, expected to sustain between 5,000 and 20,000 homes, will be required to go through the same planning processes as other major developments, the government says.
They are expected to achieve "zero-carbon status" across all buildings, and 40% of each area left as green space.
The government needs three million more homes to be built by 2020.
'Vigorously'
It recently said it had "acted properly throughout this process" and would "defend this claim vigorously".
Last November, it emerged only one of the 12 sites identified as having development potential - Rackheath near Norwich - was regarded as "generally suitable".
The others all had question marks over them and the Weston Otmoor site was deemed least likely to proceed.
For the Conservatives, shadow housing minister Grant Shapps said: "In principle eco-towns started off as a good idea but have become a disaster as Labour pushed them through using misguided political means.
"Ministers seem intent on ignoring the voice of local people... it is vital that if any eco town that gets the go ahead it has the support of the local community."