This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/world/7833009.stm
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Tougher burglary sentences urged | Tougher burglary sentences urged |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| The Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales has urged stiff sentences for burglars for who steal sentimental and irreplaceable items such as photos. | |
| Lord Judge said there must be more consistent sentencing recognising a victim's trauma and loss. | |
| The strongly-worded guidance came in a Court of Appeal judgement upholding sentences against six burglars. | |
| The judgement means sentences should now recognise both economic losses and the importance of the family home. | |
| In the case, Lord Judge and two other Court of Appeal judges rejected appeals by burglars from various parts of England who had claimed that their sentences were too long for the crimes they had committed. The sentences ranged from 12 months to five years. | |
| The loss or destruction of letters written in the early days of courtship may distress the widow or widower who has lost them far more than the disappearance of valuable electrical equipment Lord Judge, the Lord Chief Justice | |
| "Burglary of a home is a serious criminal offence," said the Lord Chief Justice. "There is a long-standing, almost intuitive, belief that our homes should be our castles. Something precious is violated by burglary of a home and those who perpetrate this crime should be sentenced and punished accordingly." | |
| Lord Judge said that it was not just the theft of valuable goods that affected victims, but theft of items of sentimental value. | |
| "Many warm and happy memories of bygone years can be destroyed as a direct consequence of burglary. For some, indeed, their home becomes something of a prison as they barricade themselves behind the security arrangements they believe they need. | |
| "Whether or not the burglar has any specific intention to cause harm, he runs the risk that the victm or victims may suffer serious adverse consequences. Where this happens, sentences should be reflective even of unintended consequences." | |
| Aggravating factors | |
| The Court of Appeal said that judges should note a number of aggravating factors in their sentencing, including targeting of elderly or vulnerable people and the theft of sentimental items. Burglars should expect to be jailed for a break-in should the courts identify any of these and other important factors. | |
| In practice this could lead to burglars who steal an irreplaceable family heirloom of little real value receiving prison terms similar to those who walk out with an expensive modern television. Burglars who are caught for a third break-in should be jailed for at least three years, said the judges. | |
| "Where goods of slight economic but significant sentimental value are taken or damaged, the impact on the victim is likely to be high, not least because these objects are irreplaceable," said the judgement. | |
| "A photograph is worth nothing, expect to the person who owns it. But it may be the only image left of grandparents or now deceased parents. | |
| "The loss or destruction of letters written in the early days of courtship may distress the widow or widower who has lost them far more than the disappearance of valuable electrical equipment." | |
| The judgement will act as important sentencing guidance to crown courts in England and Wales and has come after some misunderstandings of the existing guidelines on burglary sentences. |