This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51053200

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
US House to vote on limiting Trump war powers against Iran US House votes to limit Trump war powers on Iran
(about 1 hour later)
The US House of Representatives is set to vote on a resolution that aims to limit President Donald Trump's ability to make war on Iran. The US House of Representatives has approved a largely symbolic resolution seeking to limit President Donald Trump's ability to make war on Iran.
The largely symbolic measure seeks to mandate congressional approval for any conflict with Iran, except in cases of an imminent attack against the US. The measure passed the Democratic-run chamber 224-194, but faces an uphill climb in the Republican-held Senate.
It is expected to pass the Democratic-held House, but faces tougher prospects in the Republican-controlled Senate. It aims to mandate congressional approval for any conflict with Iran, except in cases of an imminent attack against the US.
Neither the US nor Iran have declared plans for further military action. Neither the US nor Iran has declared plans for further military action.
Iran this week fired missiles at Iraqi bases housing American forces, injuring no-one, after the US last week killed a senior Iranian commander in a Baghdad drone strike.Iran this week fired missiles at Iraqi bases housing American forces, injuring no-one, after the US last week killed a senior Iranian commander in a Baghdad drone strike.
Thursday's measure directs the president to "terminate the use of United States Armed Forces" against Iran unless granted congressional authorisation. Thursday's measure directed the president to "terminate the use of United States Armed Forces" against Iran unless granted congressional authorisation.
It offers an exception when necessary to "defend against an imminent armed attack". It offered an exception when necessary to "defend against an imminent armed attack".
Even if the House measure clears Congress, it would not face a potential Trump veto because it is known as a concurrent resolution, which does not require a presidential signature. Even if the House measure cleared Congress, it would not face a potential Trump veto because it is known as a concurrent resolution, which does not require a presidential signature.
The proposal cites the 1973 War Powers Act, which granted Congress the ability to check the president's power to commit the US to armed conflict. The proposal cited the 1973 War Powers Act, which granted Congress the ability to check the president's power to commit the US to armed conflict.
But legal questions remain unresolved as to whether Congress can use a concurrent resolution to bind the president.But legal questions remain unresolved as to whether Congress can use a concurrent resolution to bind the president.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Thursday she did not believe Mr Trump had made the US safer after last week's drone strike that killed Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said earlier on Thursday she did not believe Mr Trump had made the US safer after last week's drone strike that killed Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani.
Mr Trump, a Republican, meanwhile tweeted that he hoped "all House Republicans will vote against Crazy Nancy Pelosi's War Powers Resolution". Mr Trump, a Republican, had tweeted that he hoped "all House Republicans will vote against Crazy Nancy Pelosi's War Powers Resolution".
He also made a new claim about the intelligence behind the air raid, telling reporters at the White House the Iranians were "looking to blow up our embassy" in Iraq.He also made a new claim about the intelligence behind the air raid, telling reporters at the White House the Iranians were "looking to blow up our embassy" in Iraq.
The war powers resolution gathered momentum after a congressional briefing on Wednesday by administration officials seeking to justify the attack.The war powers resolution gathered momentum after a congressional briefing on Wednesday by administration officials seeking to justify the attack.
Following the briefing by the secretary of state, defence secretary and CIA director, two Republicans senators broke ranks.Following the briefing by the secretary of state, defence secretary and CIA director, two Republicans senators broke ranks.
Mike Lee of Utah and Rand Paul of Kentucky said they might back a similar resolution in the Senate seeking to limit the president's war powers.Mike Lee of Utah and Rand Paul of Kentucky said they might back a similar resolution in the Senate seeking to limit the president's war powers.
Their potential defection raises the chances for the measure in the upper chamber, where Republicans hold a 53-47 majority.Their potential defection raises the chances for the measure in the upper chamber, where Republicans hold a 53-47 majority.
Mr Lee told reporters it was "the worst briefing I've seen at least on a military issue in the nine years I've served".Mr Lee told reporters it was "the worst briefing I've seen at least on a military issue in the nine years I've served".
He said the administration officials had asked them not even to debate the president's authority to strike Iran. He described their approach as "un-American" and "insane".He said the administration officials had asked them not even to debate the president's authority to strike Iran. He described their approach as "un-American" and "insane".
But most Republicans lawmakers have stood by the president.But most Republicans lawmakers have stood by the president.
Doug Collins of Georgia claimed Democrats were "in love with terrorists" and grieving more for Soleimani than for US service personnel killed by the Iranian commander.Doug Collins of Georgia claimed Democrats were "in love with terrorists" and grieving more for Soleimani than for US service personnel killed by the Iranian commander.
"They mourn Soleimani more than they mourn our Gold Star families who are the ones who suffered under Soleimani," he told Fox News."They mourn Soleimani more than they mourn our Gold Star families who are the ones who suffered under Soleimani," he told Fox News.