This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jan/09/duke-and-duchess-of-sussex-defied-queen-over-statement-release

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Duke and Duchess of Sussex 'defied Queen' over statement release Duke and Duchess of Sussex 'defied Queen' over statement release
(about 2 hours later)
Announcement they were stepping back as senior royals ‘blindsided’ palace Queen seeks resolution over Prince Harry and Meghan’s future within ‘days not weeks’
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex defied instructions from the Queen not to go public with their bombshell announcement they are to step back as senior royals until details of their plans had been fully discussed, it has been claimed. The Queen, Prince of Wales and Duke of Cambridge have instructed their senior aides to work with the UK and Canadian governments to help carve out new roles for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex within “days not weeks”.
The Guardian understands that the couple went ahead regardless, sending a copy of their explosive statement to Prince Charles and Prince William just 10 minutes before it was released on Instagram, and without any further consultation. The three most senior royals were engaged in crisis talks on Thursday following Prince Harry and Meghan’s bombshell announcement that they are to “step back” from the royal family, and split their time between Britain and North America.
Buckingham Palace was said to have been “blindsided” by the release of the statement while talks were at such a very early stage. Senior family members were reportedly left feeling “disappointed” and “hurt”. Palace officials hope a resolution, in the form of a fully worked out and agreed plan, could be announced within days to help achieve the couple’s ambitions for “progressive” new roles.
As myriad questions remained unanswered, the sequence of events leading to the announcement emerged. Royal aides have been directed to work with the Sussexes and government representatives “at pace”, according to sources. There is said to be a willingness to make this work, though Buckingham Palace has acknowledged there are “complicated issues to work through”.
Harry originally contacted his father about spending more time in Canada and America just before Christmas, but was told he needed to come up with a thought-out plan, according to details first reported by royal editor Robert Jobson on the Evening Standard. The couple announced their explosive news on Instagram and their new website on Wednesday evening. Members of the royal family were not given any warning of the move, leaving Buckingham Palace blindsided.
He then sent a draft proposal about his planned new role to Charles early in the new year, but was informed more time was required to think through the complex implications, particularly over funding. In it the couple said they intended to work towards becoming “financially independent” in new “progressive” roles which would see them freed from palace constraints, allowed to earn an income, and to promote their causes while also “continuing to honour our duty to the Queen, the Commonwealth, and our patronages”.
Harry then sought a meeting with the Queen as soon as the couple and son Archie returned from their six-week break from royal duties. He was told the Queen would only meet him after he had discussed the plans in detail with Charles, sources told Jobson. It has emerged that Harry had been in the very early stages of talks with Prince Charles, and had asked for a meeting with the Queen. Harry sought a meeting with the monarch as soon as the couple and their son, Archie, returned from their six-week break in Canada. However, the Queen thought such a meeting should only take place once he had discussed the plans in more detail with Charles.
The planned meeting was blocked by courtiers, but the Queen is said to have made it clear the couple should not go public at this time. The couple were urged not to go public about the plans, it is understood.
No senior royal knew in advance the wording of the statement, penned personally by the couple, or that it was about to be released. Harry had originally contacted his father about spending more time in Canada and America just before Christmas, but was told he needed to come up with a thought-out plan, according to royal editor Robert Jobson of the Evening Standard.
Amid fallout over the news, there was said to be a willingness at the palace to make the new roles work. But, senior advisers have stressed, there are “complicated issues” to work through. He then sent a draft proposal to Charles early in the New Year, but was informed more time was required to think through the complexities of various issues, including funding.
In their statement on Wednesday, Harry and Meghan said they intended to “step back”, split their time between the UK and North America, and work to become “financially independent”. A new “progressive role” would see them freed from palace constraints, allowed to earn income, promote their causes while also “continuing to honour our duty to the Queen, the Commonwealth, and our patronages”. There was “disappointment” among royal family members at the couple’s announcement. Though Charles is understood to share the disappointment at the way the news came out, he is also thought to be resolute that a solution needs to be found swiftly. It is believed there was no rage or fury, but instead a pragmatic sense of “lets get this done”.
A number of royal commentators have criticised the decision, with some describing it as the biggest surprise since the Panorama interview with Diana, Princess of Wales. It is thought that Harry and Meghan emailed a copy of their statement to both Charles and Prince William around 10 minutes before they released it on Instagram, but with no follow-up phone call or further consultation it is believed their message was not seen in time.
Dickie Arbiter, a former palace press secretary, said of the couple’s actions: “It seems to be a succession of doing things their own way, which is the wrong way.” Royal author Penny Junor said it had echoes of when Diana announced she was stepping back from 50 of her charities without consulting anybody. “The problem is that they are not working for themselves, they are working for a family firm, and to be making announcements of this sort without consulting is beyond bizarre”. As the Duchess of Cambridge celebrated her 38th birthday at Kensington Palace on Thursday, and royal aides attended crisis meetings, myriad questions about the implications of the Sussexes’ plans remain unanswered.
But Meghan received support from her close friend Jessica Mulroney, Canadian stylist and wife of Canadian TV presenter, Ben Mulroney, who posted a quote attributed to US singer and filmmaker Gina Carey, saying: “A strong woman looks a challenge in the eye and gives it a wink.” A string of royal commentators criticised the decision, with some describing it as the biggest surprise since the Panorama interview with Princess Diana, Harry’s mother. Others saw it as a declaration of independence, and the establishment of a separate court – a rival court – to the one based at Buckingham Palace.
On their new website, sussexroyal.com the couple said they received just 5% of their funding for official duties from public money through the sovereign grant, the formula for funding the monarchy that replaced the civil list in 2012. Royal author Penny Junor, compared it to Diana announcing she was stepping back from 50 of her charities without consulting anybody. “The problem is that they are not working for themselves, they are working for a family firm, and to be making announcements of this sort without consulting is beyond bizarre,” Junor said.
The remaining 95% of their funding comes from Prince Charles’s private income from the Duchy of Cornwall. However, it is understood that the 5% figure does not include travel expenses or their round-the-clock security detail. But Meghan received support from her close friend Jessica Mulroney, Canadian stylist and wife of Canadian TV presenter Ben Mulroney, who posted a quote attributed to US singer and filmmaker Gina Carey, saying: “A strong woman looks a challenge in the eye and gives it a wink.”
They will also hand-pick selected journalists to cover their engagements, and no longer participate in the “royal rota”, which allowed accredited royal correspondents from UK newspapers access to their events. As yet there are no indications as to how the couple intend to become financially independent.
There has been no further explanation of how they intend to become “financially independent”. Their website claims they receive just 5% of their funding for official duties from public money through the sovereign grant, the formula for funding the monarchy. But this does not take into account the high costs of their armed security detail, or their domestic and overseas travel.
Media organisations often seek to justify criticism of the couple by claiming public interest because they receive public funding. They may hope relinquishing this funding will strip away this justification, and grant them greater power over protecting their privacy. Media often seek to justify criticism of the couple by claiming public interest because they receive public funding. They may hope relinquishing this funding strips away such justification, and grants them greater powers to protect their privacy.
Harry inherited an estimated £7m from his late mother’s estate, which will have grown with investment. He and William also inherited her dresses and valuable jewellery. He is also thought to have received money from a trust fund left by the Queen Mother, although the exact amount is not known. The remaining 95% of their funding comes from Charles’s private income from the Duchy of Cornwall. They have not made clear if they intend to become financially independent of Charles. On becoming king, Charles will inherit the Duchy of Lancaster, and could continue to fund the Sussexes through that.
David McClure, author of Royal Legacy, about royal finances, estimated the couple could be worth up to £18m in total. He warned: “The history of senior royals making money – the two is a toxic mix. It hasn’t worked well in the past.” Harry inherited £7m from his late mother’s estate, which will have grown with investment. He and William also inherited her dresses and valuable jewellery. He is also thought to have received money from a trust fund left by the Queen Mother.
In 2002 the Earl and Countess of Wessex both stood down from their businesses, in television and PR, after accusations they were cashing in on their royal status. Sophie Wessex was caught in a “fake sheikh” sting by an undercover journalist trying to bid for business, which led to a major review by the palace of the royals’ commercial interests. David McClure, author of Royal Legacy, about royal finances, estimated the couple could be worth up to £18m in total. He warned: “The history of senior royals making money … is a toxic mix. It hasn’t worked well in the past.”
So far neither the couple, nor Buckingham Palace, has shed any light on the high costs of security to the taxpayer, which runs to more than £100m a year for the whole royal family. The couple’s website states they are classified as “internationally protected people” requiring armed security from the Metropolitan police. In 2002, the Earl and Countess of Wessex both stood down from their businesses, in television and PR, after accusations they were cashing in on their royal status. Sophie Wessex was caught in a “fake sheikh” sting by an undercover journalist trying to bid for business, which led to a major review by the palace of the royals’ commercial interests.
While in the UK, it seems the couple expect their bill to be met by taxpayers. If in Canada, which is a realm, it may fall to Canadian taxpayers. There is no answer to who would pay if they lived in the US. Shuttling across the Atlantic would significantly increase their security bill. No light has yet been shed on who will meet the high costs of the couple’s security, which costs taxpayers more than £100m a year for the entire royal family. The Sussexes’ website states they are classified as “internationally protected people”, requiring armed security from the Metropolitan police.
Meanwhile, wax figures of the couple were removed from the royal set at Madame Tussauds in London. Steve Davies, general manager at the attraction, said they would stand separately. “As two of our most popular and well-loved figures they will of course remain an important feature at Madame Tussauds London as we watch to see what the next chapter holds for them.” While in the UK, it seems the couple expect their bill to be met by taxpayers. If in Canada, which is a realm, the costs may fall to Canadian taxpayers. Shuttling across the Atlantic would significantly increase the cost of their security detail.
In an escalation of their war against British tabloids, Harry and Meghan said they now intend to hand-pick selected journalists to cover their engagements, and will no longer participate in the “royal rota” system, which allowed accredited royal correspondents from UK newspapers access to their events.
Amid the fallout, wax figures of the couple were removed from the royal set at Madame Tussauds London. Steve Davies, general manager at the attraction, said they would now stand separately. “As two of our most popular and well-loved figures they will of course remain an important feature at Madame Tussauds London as we watch to see what the next chapter holds for them.”