This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/jan/06/harvey-weinstein-trial-metoo-movement

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Harvey Weinstein: first day of sexual crimes trial erupts as lawyers trade insults Harvey Weinstein: first day of sexual crimes trial erupts as lawyers trade insults
(32 minutes later)
Legal teams decry each other’s behavior as ‘abominable’ and ‘humiliating’ on opening day of trial on five sexual assault countsLegal teams decry each other’s behavior as ‘abominable’ and ‘humiliating’ on opening day of trial on five sexual assault counts
The rape trial of the fallen movie mogul Harvey Weinstein began on Monday in Manhattan and immediately erupted into furious name-calling between lawyers, who decried each other’s behavior as “abominable”, “degrading” and “humiliating”. The rape trial of the movie mogul Harvey Weinstein began on Monday in Manhattan and immediately erupted into furious name-calling between lawyers, who decried each other’s behaviour as “abominable”, “degrading” and “humiliating”.
The irascible display was a sign of the high stakes involved in a trial that marks the next chapter in the #MeToo movement triggered by allegations of sexual misconduct by the movie producer two years ago. It was a sign of the high stakes involved in a trial that marks the next chapter in the #MeToo movement triggered by allegations of sexual misconduct by the movie producer two years ago.
Weinstein has pleaded not guilty to five counts that include raping a woman in 2013 and forcing another woman to engage in oral sexual conduct in 2006. The most serious charge is predatory sexual assault, carrying a maximum sentence of life.Weinstein has pleaded not guilty to five counts that include raping a woman in 2013 and forcing another woman to engage in oral sexual conduct in 2006. The most serious charge is predatory sexual assault, carrying a maximum sentence of life.
Weinstein came into the courtroom crouched over a walking frame and trailed by lawyers, minders and court officials. He sat on the defense benches, only 10ft away from Gloria Allred, the campaigning attorney who represents two women who will testify. The pair did not make eye contact. Outside court, a group of accusers including the actors Rose McGowan and Rosanna Arquette stared as Weinstein got out of his car. Some were holding signs that said “Listen to survivors” and “Justice for survivors”. Surrounded by his legal team, hunched over a gray metal walker, Weinstein hurried into the building.
The trial is set to be one of the most high-profile judicial events of the century, its cast of characters drawn from Hollywood’s high table. More than 80 women have accused Weinstein of sexual misconduct over decades, including the actors Rosanna Arquette, Ashley Judd, Rose McGowan and Gwyneth Paltrow. Inside, he sat on the defense benches. He was only 10ft from Gloria Allred, the campaigning attorney who represents two women who will testify. The pair did not make eye contact.
The case is also of intimate importance to all who have endured sexual harassment in the workplace. For them, the #MeToo movement triggered by the Weinstein revelations in October 2017 has become a driving force for change. The trial is set to be one of the most high-profile judicial events of the century, its cast drawn from Hollywood’s high table. More than 80 women have accused Weinstein of sexual misconduct, the actors Ashley Judd and Gwyneth Paltrow among them.
For Weinstein, too, the stakes could not be higher. Though his fall has been dramatic, he has so far avoided any personal punishment. Last month a $25m settlement was reached involving more than 30 women. But to the dismay of some, the deal did not touch Weinstein’s own money or require him to admit guilt. The case is also of intimate importance to all who have endured sexual harassment in the workplace. For them, the movement triggered by the Weinstein revelations in October 2017 has become a driving force for change.
For Weinstein, the stakes could not be higher. Though his fall has been dramatic, he has avoided personal punishment. Last month a $25m settlement was reached involving more than 30 women. To the dismay of some, the deal did not touch Weinstein’s own money or require him to admit guilt.
The most serious charge is predatory sexual assault. To secure a guilty verdict, prosecutors will have to convince the jury the producer engaged in a pattern of sexual crimes over time.The most serious charge is predatory sexual assault. To secure a guilty verdict, prosecutors will have to convince the jury the producer engaged in a pattern of sexual crimes over time.
The judge in New York county supreme court, James Burke, has indicated he will allow three other women to testify including Sopranos actor Annabella Sciorra, who alleges Weinstein sexually assaulted her in her apartment in 1993. Though that incident is beyond the statute of limitations, it can be presented as evidence of alleged predatory behaviour. The judge in New York county supreme court, James Burke, has indicated he will allow three other women to testify including Sopranos actor Annabella Sciorra, who alleges Weinstein sexually assaulted her in 1993. Though that incident is beyond the statute of limitations, it can be presented as evidence of alleged predatory behaviour.
On Monday, the hearing erupted into a fierce dispute. In one of the most testy exchanges, lead prosecutor Joan Illuzzi-Orbon accused Weinstein’s attorneys of “abominable” behaviour by which she said they had “degraded and humiliated” the accusers in the media. On Monday, the hearing erupted in dispute. In one exchange, lead prosecutor Joan Illuzzi-Orbon accused Weinstein’s attorneys of “abominable” behaviour which “degraded and humiliated” the accusers.
“In the last 72 hours it has been in our opinion abominable to talk about evidence, to talk about sealed discovery in public, to talk about witnesses in a humiliating way,” Illuzzi-Orbon said.“In the last 72 hours it has been in our opinion abominable to talk about evidence, to talk about sealed discovery in public, to talk about witnesses in a humiliating way,” Illuzzi-Orbon said.
She pointed to a conversation in which one of Weinstein’s legal team cast aspersions on one of the women accusing the defendant. “If you say things like ‘She’s a good actress, I’m sure she will come off well, she’s performing, or that she’s lying, or that it was a loving intimate relationship’…” She pointed to a conversation in which one of Weinstein’s legal team cast aspersions on an accuser. “If you say things like, ‘She’s a good actress, I’m sure she will come off well, she’s performing, or that she’s lying, or that it was a loving intimate relationship …’”
The prosecutor said evidence would be presented that would discount any such claim of intimacy between Weinstein and his alleged victims. The prosecutor said evidence would be presented that would discount any claim of intimacy between Weinstein and his alleged victims.
“I can assure you that was not the case,” she said, “and we will show that.”“I can assure you that was not the case,” she said, “and we will show that.”
The judge turned to one of Weinstein’s lead lawyers, the Chicago attorney Donna Rotunno, and said: “So what did you do, Miss Rotunno?” The judge turned to one of Weinstein’s lawyers and said: “So what did you do, Miss Rotunno?”
Rotunno said: “I did nothing improper. I have been professional, I have been respectful and I have done my job.” Donna Rotunno said: “I did nothing improper. I have been professional, I have been respectful and I have done my job.”
Judge Burke issued an edict to both parties: “Leave the witnesses alone. Do not talk about them in any capacity.” Burke issued an edict to both parties: “Leave the witnesses alone. Do not talk about them in any capacity.”
The issue of how the women who will testify have been treated also came up in regard to Black Cube, a corporate intelligence company run largely by former officers of the Israeli intelligence agency the Mossad. The New Yorker journalist Ronan Farrow revealed that Weinstein employed two investigators from Black Cube to make contact with accusers as a way of extracting information. The issue of how the women who will testify have been treated also came up in regard to Black Cube, a corporate intelligence company run largely by former officers of Israeli intelligence. The New Yorker journalist Ronan Farrow revealed that Weinstein employed Black Cube to make contact with accusers as a way of extracting information.
The prosecutor requested the court to order Weinstein’s lawyers to tell the jury Black Cube contacted witnesses. Illuzzi-Orbon said that without such an instruction she would be obliged to call David Boies, a prominent lawyer who worked for Weinstein for many years and advised him on how to handle sexual assault accusations. The prosecutor requested the court to order Weinstein’s lawyers to tell the jury Black Cube contacted witnesses.
The prosecution also revealed that they wished to present the jury with photographs relating to one of the accusers. There are 72 photographs in the set, they said, though they intend to admit seven. The prosecution also revealed that they wished to present the jury with photographs relating to one accuser. There are 72, they said, though they intend to admit seven.
“We have minimalised any undue prejudices” in the images, Illuzzi-Orbon said. “We do feel the they are very, very important for the jury to see.”“We have minimalised any undue prejudices” in the images, Illuzzi-Orbon said. “We do feel the they are very, very important for the jury to see.”
The judge reserved his ruling.The judge reserved his ruling.
Weinstein’s team continued to protest that they were not being given sufficient evidentiary material. In particular they protested that medical records of one of the accusers, including notes of a visit to a hospital emergency room, were heavily redacted. Weinstein’s team protested that they were not being given sufficient evidentiary material. In particular they protested that medical records of one of the accusers, including notes of a visit to a hospital emergency room, were heavily redacted.
When prosecutors said this was a very sensitive matter, a Weinstein attorney said: “The state says this is a sensitive matter for the complaining witnesses – no doubt. But it is also a sensitive matter for Mr Weinstein. It affects his ability to defend himself.” A Weinstein attorney said: “The state says this is a sensitive matter for the complaining witnesses – no doubt. But it is also a sensitive matter for Mr Weinstein. It affects his ability to defend himself.”
The case was adjourned until Tuesday, when jury selection begins. It is expected to take up to two weeks. The case was adjourned until Tuesday, when jury selection begins. That is expected to take up to two weeks.
Weinstein’s lawyers will look to weed out anyone who harbours #MeToo feelings of revenge. Prosecutors will look for prejudged opinions that #MeToo has gone too far or is subjecting men to unfair treatment. Each side will be able to remove up to three jurors without reason, a system known as “preemptory strikes”. Outside, the accusers who call themselves the “silence breakers” spoke to reporters. McGowan read an open letter to Weinstein.
“You thought you could terrorise me and others into silence,” she said. “You were wrong. That we’ve come to this moment of justice is staggering. The trial means so much to so many.”
McGowan was joined by six other women, including Arquette, Lauren Sivan and Sarah Ann Masse. They responded to Weinstein’s comments to the New York Post in December, in which he lamented that his work “promoting women has been forgotten”.
“For every woman he put on the screen, he took out about a hundred behind the scenes,” McGowan said.
Masse noted that when Weinstein walked into court, “he wouldn’t look at us, he wouldn’t make eye contact. Nothing has changed. He’s a coward.” To Arquette, he looked like a “very broken man”.
McGowan added: “I think he has taken some good acting tips.”