This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/31/us/politics/trump-iran-baghdad-embassy.html

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Trump Warns Iran as Risk of Wider Armed Conflict Grows Trump Warns Iran as Risk of Wider Armed Conflict Grows
(about 2 hours later)
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — President Trump toughened his rhetoric toward Iran on Tuesday, saying the country would “be held fully responsible” for the attack by Iraqi demonstrators on the United States Embassy compound in Baghdad, an assault that Mr. Trump said was directed by Tehran.WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — President Trump toughened his rhetoric toward Iran on Tuesday, saying the country would “be held fully responsible” for the attack by Iraqi demonstrators on the United States Embassy compound in Baghdad, an assault that Mr. Trump said was directed by Tehran.
The growing crisis raised unexpected new questions about the Trump administration’s relationship with Iraq, and it strained Mr. Trump’s aversion to a military clash with Iran as well as any deeper entanglements in the Middle East. Mr. Trump faced pressure from hawkish allies in Washington to go further, while memories of the deadly attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, loomed over the administration. “This is not a Warning, it is a Threat. Happy New Year,” Mr. Trump wrote Tuesday evening, in some of his most bellicose language of the year toward Iran.
“To those many millions of people in Iraq who want freedom and who don’t want to be dominated and controlled by Iran, this is your time!” Mr. Trump implored on Twitter as demonstrators set up camp at the gates of the American Embassy in Baghdad. The growing crisis has strained Mr. Trump’s aversion to war with Iran as well as his distaste for Middle East entanglements generally, including in Iraq. Mr. Trump faced pressure from hawkish allies in Washington to confront Iran forcefully, while memories of the deadly attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, loomed over the administration.
The siege on the embassy created an unwelcome holiday disruption for Mr. Trump, who has spent the past week out of sight, splitting time between his Mar-a-Lago resort estate in Florida and his luxury golf club a few miles away. Mr. Trump has not spoken to reporters since Christmas Eve and was absent from a Sunday evening news briefing at Mar-a-Lago during which three of his top national security officials discussed American airstrikes against an Iranian-backed Iraqi militia. Many analysts said Iran has thrown the Trump administration on its heels and force a president entering his re-election year into unpalatable decisions about escalation and the risk of wider conflict.
But on Tuesday he interrupted his holiday routine, leaving his golf club hours earlier than usual and noting on Twitter that he had held a meeting there on “the Middle East, the Military, and Trade.” “The Iranians believe Trump has shown he doesn’t want to go to war,” said Vali Nars, a former State Department official in the Obama administration and professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies. Mr. Nasr said that the country’s leaders are “making the president realize there is risk and cost to his policy” of crippling sanctions on the country’s economy.
Earlier on Tuesday, Mr. Trump issued a stern warning to Tehran. “Iran is orchestrating an attack on the U.S. Embassy in Iraq,” he tweeted. “They will be held fully responsible.” The siege on the embassy created an unwelcome holiday crisis for Mr. Trump, who has spent the past week out of sight, splitting time between his Mar-a-Lago resort estate in Florida and his luxury golf club a few miles away. Mr. Trump has not spoken to reporters since Christmas Eve and was absent from a Sunday evening news briefing at Mar-a-Lago during which three of his top national security officials discussed American airstrikes against an Iranian-backed Iraqi militia.
No Americans were harmed in the assault on the compound, and the attackers did not enter any embassy buildings. But the Trump administration was treating the threat as a new escalation by Iran, two days after Mr. Trump approved the airstrikes against the militia group that American officials said was responsible for a recent rocket attack on an Iraqi military base that killed an American contractor and wounded four American soldiers. But on Tuesday the White House said Mr. Trump spoke by telephone with Iraq’s prime minister, Adil Abd al-Mahdi, imploring him to help protect Americans in the country.
Trump administration officials, particularly Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, have long spoken about the need to “restore deterrence” against Iran to check its military activities throughout the Middle East. They blame President Barack Obama for emboldening Tehran through the 2015 nuclear deal. Although Iraq has seen mass anti-government protests in recent months, Mr. Trump left no doubt that he viewed the embassy assault as Tehran’s handiwork. “Iran is orchestrating an attack on the U.S. Embassy in Iraq,” he tweeted. “They will be held fully responsible.” Mr. Trump also ordered a contingent of Marines to protect the American personnel there.
But even some of Mr. Trump’s traditional conservative allies fear that a president who has repeatedly called for winding down “endless wars” has effectively condoned Iranian behavior with his clear aversion to using military force. In mid-June, Mr. Trump ordered limited airstrikes to punish Iran for shooting down an expensive American drone near its coastline, only to call off the attack at the last minute. Mr. Trump also defied calls from some Republican supporters to strike at Iran after it attacked a major Saudi oil production facility in September, although Mr. Trump has dispatched thousands of American troops to help Saudi Arabia defend itself. No Americans were harmed in the assault on the compound, and the attackers did not enter any embassy buildings. But the Trump administration was treating the threat as a serious new escalation by Iran, two days after Mr. Trump approved the airstrikes against the militia group that American officials said launched a rocket attack on an Iraqi military base that killed an American contractor and wounded four American soldiers.
Mr. Trump has also repeatedly said he would like to negotiate a new agreement with Iran’s leaders to replace Mr. Obama’s nuclear pact, and would welcome a grand deal as something he can point to in his re-election campaign. But Iran has refused to discuss its nuclear program and other issues until Mr. Trump rolls back economic sanctions on the Islamic republic, including sharp limits on its oil exports, a step the president has refused to take. The events of the past several days amount to a violent cat-and-mouse game between Washington and Iran, as Tehran bridles under economic sanctions and seeks to exact a price from the United States. Those sanctions contributed to mass protests that the country’s leaders say were instigated by the United States to bring down Iran’s regime.
Mr. Trump was cheered on by some hawkish Republican allies on Tuesday, including Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a longtime advocate of confrontation with Iran who golfed with the president in Florida on Tuesday. Trump administration officials, particularly Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, have long spoken about the need to “restore deterrence” against Iran to check its military activities in the Middle East. They blame President Barack Obama for emboldening Tehran through the 2015 nuclear deal. But supporters of the nuclear deal say that Mr. Trump’s May 2018 withdrawal from it prompted Iran and its proxies to adopt a more aggressive posture toward the United States.
Mr. Graham praised Mr. Trump on Twitter for “acting decisively” and told Iran that the president “will hold you accountable for threats against Americans and hit you where it hurts the most.” He also issued what appeared to be a veiled threat of further military action, telling the Iranian government that “a country that depends on the ability to refine oil for its existence needs to be cautious.” Even some of Mr. Trump’s allies fear that a president who has repeatedly called for winding down “endless wars” has effectively condoned Iranian behavior by shying away from military force. In mid-June, Mr. Trump ordered limited airstrikes to punish Iran for shooting down an expensive American drone near its coastline, only to call off the attack at the last minute. Mr. Trump also defied calls from some Republican supporters to strike at Iran after it attacked a major Saudi oil production facility in September.
Echoing Mr. Graham was Senator Tom Cotton, Republican of Arkansas, who said in a statement on Tuesday that Iran had committed “yet another reckless escalation” and “must be held responsible.” Mr. Trump has also said he would like to negotiate a new nuclear agreement with Iran’s leaders. But Iran has refused to discuss its nuclear program until Mr. Trump rolls back economic sanctions, including on oil exports, a step the president has refused to take.
Complicating the picture was what a senior Trump administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity on Monday, cast as longtime frustration with the Iraqi government, which has not taken more action to protect American military and diplomatic personnel from threats by Iranian-backed militia groups. Thousands of American troops and civilians remain in Iraq nearly a decade after the United States officially ended its occupation of the country. Mr. Trump was cheered on by some Republican allies on Tuesday, including Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a longtime advocate of confrontation with Iran who golfed with the president in Florida on Tuesday.
Mr. Trump tweeted on Tuesday that “we expect Iraq to use its forces to protect the Embassy, and so notified!” Senators from both parties echoed that view on Tuesday, even as much of Iraq’s political establishment bitterly complained about the American airstrikes within its borders this week. Mr. Graham praised Mr. Trump on Twitter for “acting decisively” and told Iran that the president “will hold you accountable for threats against Americans and hit you where it hurts the most.” He also issued a veiled threat of further military action, telling the Iranian government that “a country that depends on the ability to refine oil for its existence needs to be cautious.”
Senator Tom Cotton, Republican of Arkansas, said Iran “must be held responsible.”
Complicating the picture was what a senior Trump administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity on Monday, cast as longtime frustration with the Iraqi government, which has not sufficiently protected American military and diplomatic personnel from Iranian-backed militia groups. About 5,000 American troops and several thousand more civilians remain in Iraq nearly a decade after the United States officially ended its occupation of the country.
Mr. Trump has repeatedly criticized the 2003 American invasion of the country as a colossal mistake and has been eager to withdraw American forces from neighboring Syria.
Mr. Trump tweeted on Tuesday that “we expect Iraq to use its forces to protect the Embassy, and so notified!”
But much of Iraq’s political establishment have bitterly complained about the American airstrikes within its borders. The strikes hit Shiite militia fighters who, while aligned with Iran, helped to defend Iraq from the Islamic State in recent years and have close ties to the country’s leadership.
“The story in Iraq has shifted,” Mr. Nasr said, as prior anger at Iranian influence in the country is displaced by outrage at Washington. “I think the administration has miscalculated.”
On Tuesday, Mr. Trump tried to keep the focus on Iranian influence in Baghdad.
“To those many millions of people in Iraq who want freedom and who don’t want to be dominated and controlled by Iran, this is your time!” Mr. Trump implored on Twitter as demonstrators set up camp at the gates of the American Embassy in Iraq’s capital.
Mr. Trump’s former national security adviser, John R. Bolton, warned in a tweet against conflating the embassy attack with mass protests that have gripped Iraq in recent months.Mr. Trump’s former national security adviser, John R. Bolton, warned in a tweet against conflating the embassy attack with mass protests that have gripped Iraq in recent months.
“The attack on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad is straight from Iran’s playbook in 1979,” Mr. Bolton wrote. “It’s a sign of Iranian control over Shia militia groups, not a sign of Iraqi anti-Americanism. We must protect our citizens from Iranian belligerence.” “The attack on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad is straight from Iran’s playbook in 1979,” Mr. Bolton wrote. “It’s a sign of Iranian control over Shia militia groups, not a sign of Iraqi anti-Americanism.”
Some foreign policy analysts said the fast-moving crisis pointed to muddled thinking within the Trump administration about its approach toward Iran, against which Mr. Trump has pursued a “maximum pressure” campaign of severe economic sanctions since he withdrew from the nuclear deal in mid-2018. Some foreign policy analysts said the fast-moving crisis pointed to muddled thinking within the Trump administration about its approach toward Iran.
“Trump, who would just as soon withdraw wholesale from Iraq, faces a conundrum in an election year: How to avoid looking weak on the one hand and yet avoid triggering a messy conflict with Iran and deeper involvement in Iraq on the other that will alienate his base and energize his opponents,” said Aaron David Miller, a former State Department official and Middle East expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.“Trump, who would just as soon withdraw wholesale from Iraq, faces a conundrum in an election year: How to avoid looking weak on the one hand and yet avoid triggering a messy conflict with Iran and deeper involvement in Iraq on the other that will alienate his base and energize his opponents,” said Aaron David Miller, a former State Department official and Middle East expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Mr. Trump’s public pledges to disentangle the United States from wars in the Middle East are more complicated and problematic than they appear, former officials and analysts said. While the president has talked incessantly about withdrawing American troops and has been reluctant to order military strikes, he has actually added troops in some areas, most notably about 3,000 to Saudi Arabia in an order issued in October. The key factor there was Saudi Arabia’s willingness to pay the costs of maintaining the troops, a persistent issue with Mr. Trump. Mr. Trump’s public pledges to disentangle the United States from wars in the Middle East are more complicated and problematic than they appear, former officials and analysts said. While the president has talked about withdrawing American troops, he has actually added troops in some areas, most notably about 3,000 to Saudi Arabia in an order issued in October. The key factor there was Saudi Arabia’s willingness to pay the costs of maintaining the troops, a persistent issue with Mr. Trump.
Mr. Trump has also signaled a strong distaste for engagement in foreign conflicts in neighboring Syria. He surprised top advisers by withdrawing American troops from the Syria-Turkey border in October and allowing Turkey to invade a Kurdish-held area in Syria. Mr. Trump eventually agreed to keep some troops by oil fields in Syria after senior Defense Department officials stressed to Mr. Trump that the soldiers would be securing oil. Mr. Trump has signaled a strong distaste for engagement in foreign conflicts in nearby Syria. He surprised top advisers by withdrawing American troops from the Syria-Turkey border in October and allowing Turkey to invade a Kurdish-held area in Syria. Mr. Trump eventually agreed to keep some troops by oil fields in Syria after senior Defense Department officials stressed to Mr. Trump that the soldiers would be securing oil.
Mr. Trump has persistently clashed with his top foreign policy aides at the State Department, the Pentagon and the National Security Council over American objectives in Iran, Syria and Iraq. Both Mr. Bolton and James F. Jeffrey, the State Department’s special representative on Syria, said in the fall of 2018 that the United States would remain engaged in Syria until Iran had left the country, a goal that clashed with Mr. Trump’s desires.
The president announced in December 2018 that he planned to withdraw troops from Syria, prompting the resignations of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, a veteran Marine general, and Brett H. McGurk, the special presidential envoy to the international coalition battling the Islamic State.The president announced in December 2018 that he planned to withdraw troops from Syria, prompting the resignations of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, a veteran Marine general, and Brett H. McGurk, the special presidential envoy to the international coalition battling the Islamic State.
On Tuesday morning, the State Department said Mr. Pompeo had spoken with Iraq’s prime minister, Adel Abdul Mahdi, and president, Barham Salih, in separate calls. A brief summary of the calls released by the department said Mr. Pompeo “made clear the United States will protect and defend its people, who are there to support a sovereign and independent Iraq.” On Tuesday morning, the State Department said Mr. Pompeo had spoken with Mr. Mahdi, and Iraq’s president, Barham Salih, in separate calls. A summary of the calls released by the department said Mr. Pompeo “made clear the United States will protect and defend its people, who are there to support a sovereign and independent Iraq,” and that the Iraqi leaders “assured the secretary that they took seriously their responsibility for and would guarantee the safety and security of U.S. personnel and property.”
The summary also said the two Iraqi leaders “assured the secretary that they took seriously their responsibility for and would guarantee the safety and security of U.S. personnel and property.” The safety of embassy employees is fraught for Mr. Pompeo. He delivered blistering criticism of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton when he was a member of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, which investigated the decisions she made around the 2012 attack on the diplomatic compound in Libya. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens; another full-time government employee, Sean Smith; and two American C.I.A. contractors died in that attack.
The department said on Monday night, before the attack on the embassy, that Mr. Pompeo had held separate calls on the recent American military strikes with three leaders in the Middle East who are considered partners by the Trump administration — Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed of the United Arab Emirates and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel. Former State Department officials and associates of Mr. Pompeo say because of that history and the ensuing harm to Mrs. Clinton’s political career, he is keen to ensure that American diplomats overseas are not harmed. Republican politicians say that Mr. Pompeo might run for an open Senate seat in Kansas in 2020 and then president in 2024.
The safety of embassy employees is a particularly fraught issue for Mr. Pompeo. He became a political star among Republicans for delivering blistering criticism of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton when he was a member of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, which investigated the decisions she made around the 2012 attack on the diplomatic compound in Libya. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens; another full-time government employee, Sean Smith; and two American C.I.A. contractors died in that attack. That history was clearly on the mind of the president himself. By late Tuesday afternoon, with embassy security beefed up and the imminent threat seemingly repelled, Mr. Trump boastfully tweeted: “The Anti-Benghazi!”
Former State Department officials and associates of Mr. Pompeo say because of that history and the ensuing harm to Mrs. Clinton’s political career, he is keen to ensure that American diplomats overseas are not in potentially harmful situations. Republican politicians in Washington say that Mr. Pompeo, a Trump loyalist, might run for an open Senate seat in Kansas in 2020 and then president in 2024. Fatalities or serious harm to diplomats on his watch could result in especially pointed attacks by political opponents. In May, during a period of heightened tensions with Iran, Mr. Pompeo ordered most non-Iraqi employees of the Baghdad embassy and the consulate in Erbil, in northern Iraq, to leave the country. Employee numbers at the embassy are now much lower than they were before that order, American officials say. In September 2018, Mr. Pompeo ordered the closing of the Basra consulate, despite the opposition of the top diplomat there.
In May, during a period of heightened tensions with Iran, Mr. Pompeo ordered most non-Iraqi employees of the embassy in Baghdad and the consulate in Erbil, in northern Iraq, to leave the country. Employee numbers at the embassy are still much lower than they were before that order, American officials say. In response to the turmoil in Baghdad on Tuesday, the American military conducted a show of force with helicopter gunships and deployed about 120 Marines to reinforce the compound’s grounds, a Pentagon official said.
In response to the turmoil engulfing the American Embassy in Baghdad on Tuesday, the American military conducted a show of force with helicopter gunships and deployed about 120 Marines to reinforce the compound’s grounds, a Pentagon official said. In 2014, around the same number of Marines were deployed to the embassy as the Islamic State threatened to enter the city during ISIS’ sweep across northern Iraq.
Michael Crowley reported from West Palm Beach, and Edward Wong from Washington. Thomas Gibbons-Neff contributed reporting from Washington.Michael Crowley reported from West Palm Beach, and Edward Wong from Washington. Thomas Gibbons-Neff contributed reporting from Washington.