This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-50958600

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Retired Oxford don wins age discrimination claim Oxford don forced to quit wins age discrimination claim
(32 minutes later)
An Oxford professor forced to retire at 69 was unfairly dismissed by the university, an employment tribunal has ruled.An Oxford professor forced to retire at 69 was unfairly dismissed by the university, an employment tribunal has ruled.
Physicist Paul Ewart was discriminated against on the grounds of age when his contract was not renewed in September 2017, the hearing found.Physicist Paul Ewart was discriminated against on the grounds of age when his contract was not renewed in September 2017, the hearing found.
Current Oxford University policy means staff in senior grades must retire the September before they turn 69.Current Oxford University policy means staff in senior grades must retire the September before they turn 69.
A spokesperson said it was considering its options, including an appeal.A spokesperson said it was considering its options, including an appeal.
Prof Ewart said he was delighted "especially for colleagues about to be made to retire in middle of important work". Prof Ewart said he was delighted "especially for colleagues about to be made to retire in the middle of important work".
He told the BBC he hoped he would be able to work with the university to move forward and avoid further disputes.He told the BBC he hoped he would be able to work with the university to move forward and avoid further disputes.
'Severe discriminatory impact'
The university introduced the Employer Justified Retirement Age policy (EJRA) in 2011 in a bid to bring younger and more diverse staff into posts. In 2017 it changed the age from 67 to 68.The university introduced the Employer Justified Retirement Age policy (EJRA) in 2011 in a bid to bring younger and more diverse staff into posts. In 2017 it changed the age from 67 to 68.
In its judgement, the tribunal in Reading said the EJRA was highly discriminatory and it was "hard to think of a more severe discriminatory impact".In its judgement, the tribunal in Reading said the EJRA was highly discriminatory and it was "hard to think of a more severe discriminatory impact".
"There can hardly be a greater discriminatory effect in the employment field than being dismissed simply because you hold a particular protected characteristic," it said."There can hardly be a greater discriminatory effect in the employment field than being dismissed simply because you hold a particular protected characteristic," it said.
It also said the university had failed to justify its policy. Prof Ewart gave the tribunal statistical evidence showing the policy could only help create a small number of vacancies.
The tribunal also said the university had failed to justify its policy.
Discriminating against anyone at work because of protected characteristics, such as age, is illegal under the Equality Act 2010.
In May, another Oxford don, Prof John Pitcher, lost a similar claim against the university after he was made to retire at 67.In May, another Oxford don, Prof John Pitcher, lost a similar claim against the university after he was made to retire at 67.