This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/for-those-who-know-their-history-trumps-america-first-trade-approach-is-not-reassuring/2019/12/25/a77e39f2-228b-11ea-bed5-880264cc91a9_story.html
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
For those who know their history, Trump’s ‘America First’ trade approach is not reassuring | For those who know their history, Trump’s ‘America First’ trade approach is not reassuring |
(1 day later) | |
MOMENTOUS AS it was, President Trump’s impeachment on Dec. 18 might not go down in history as the most significant happening in the last month of the 21st century’s second decade. Rather, that honor might be shared among three other events: bipartisan agreement on a revised trade deal with Canada and Mexico; Mr. Trump’s “phase one” trade agreement with China; and the U.S.-blessed collapse of a key World Trade Organization (WTO) agency that adjudicates international trade disputes. Their short-run impact might be limited and, in the case of the Canada-Mexico and China deals, temporarily stabilizing. But don’t be fooled. The big picture is that the United States is abandoning its postwar commitments to free, open, law-based trade in favor of a new approach: Might makes right. | MOMENTOUS AS it was, President Trump’s impeachment on Dec. 18 might not go down in history as the most significant happening in the last month of the 21st century’s second decade. Rather, that honor might be shared among three other events: bipartisan agreement on a revised trade deal with Canada and Mexico; Mr. Trump’s “phase one” trade agreement with China; and the U.S.-blessed collapse of a key World Trade Organization (WTO) agency that adjudicates international trade disputes. Their short-run impact might be limited and, in the case of the Canada-Mexico and China deals, temporarily stabilizing. But don’t be fooled. The big picture is that the United States is abandoning its postwar commitments to free, open, law-based trade in favor of a new approach: Might makes right. |
Free trade can have painful costs, especially for certain U.S. industries and their workers who were unable to withstand global competition. We and other supporters of free trade should be more cognizant of those, if only because the political costs of failing to acknowledge and address them include the rise of protectionists such as Mr. Trump. Yet as the formerly pro-trade Republican Party falls into line behind the president and as many Democrats quietly, or not so quietly, cooperate with his agenda as well, the overall benefits of the postwar global economic order to the United States and the world are being deliberately ignored. Those include an abundance of well-made, affordable goods for U.S. consumers (including goods that emerged from U.S. plants made ultraefficient thanks to the bracing effect of international competition). Above all, they include hundreds of millions of people lifted out of grinding poverty around the world and fewer causes for war among interdependent nations. | Free trade can have painful costs, especially for certain U.S. industries and their workers who were unable to withstand global competition. We and other supporters of free trade should be more cognizant of those, if only because the political costs of failing to acknowledge and address them include the rise of protectionists such as Mr. Trump. Yet as the formerly pro-trade Republican Party falls into line behind the president and as many Democrats quietly, or not so quietly, cooperate with his agenda as well, the overall benefits of the postwar global economic order to the United States and the world are being deliberately ignored. Those include an abundance of well-made, affordable goods for U.S. consumers (including goods that emerged from U.S. plants made ultraefficient thanks to the bracing effect of international competition). Above all, they include hundreds of millions of people lifted out of grinding poverty around the world and fewer causes for war among interdependent nations. |
By contrast, Mr. Trump has shown — in the agreement with Canada and Mexico — that the United States has enough economic clout to make relatively weak, dependent neighbors accept greater “managed trade,” to the benefit of politically favored U.S. interests: specifically, a higher minimum wage for Mexican autoworkers and greater U.S. cheese sales to Canada. In regard to a far stronger counterpart — China — Mr. Trump’s tariff war accomplished not much more than a restoration of the status quo ante in U.S. agricultural sales, plus some eventual increases on top of that. As for the administration’s decision to let the WTO’s appellate body go out of business due to lack of new judges, it is consistent with previous administrations’ concerns about the jurisprudence of that body — but inconsistent with the fact that the WTO had also often ruled in the United States’ favor and thus merits a strong U.S. effort to reform from within. | By contrast, Mr. Trump has shown — in the agreement with Canada and Mexico — that the United States has enough economic clout to make relatively weak, dependent neighbors accept greater “managed trade,” to the benefit of politically favored U.S. interests: specifically, a higher minimum wage for Mexican autoworkers and greater U.S. cheese sales to Canada. In regard to a far stronger counterpart — China — Mr. Trump’s tariff war accomplished not much more than a restoration of the status quo ante in U.S. agricultural sales, plus some eventual increases on top of that. As for the administration’s decision to let the WTO’s appellate body go out of business due to lack of new judges, it is consistent with previous administrations’ concerns about the jurisprudence of that body — but inconsistent with the fact that the WTO had also often ruled in the United States’ favor and thus merits a strong U.S. effort to reform from within. |
Absent the WTO, and with Beijing and Washington governed by nationalist presidents, the world is likelier to drift back toward the regional trade “blocs” that caused so many problems between the world wars. This is precisely what farsighted U.S. postwar leaders sought to prevent when they constructed the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade after World War II, to be followed by the WTO post-Cold War. Mr. Trump would repeal these diplomatic and political achievements under the slogan “America First,” previously adopted by U.S. isolationists in the early 1940s. For those who know their history, this seems neither coincidental nor reassuring. | Absent the WTO, and with Beijing and Washington governed by nationalist presidents, the world is likelier to drift back toward the regional trade “blocs” that caused so many problems between the world wars. This is precisely what farsighted U.S. postwar leaders sought to prevent when they constructed the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade after World War II, to be followed by the WTO post-Cold War. Mr. Trump would repeal these diplomatic and political achievements under the slogan “America First,” previously adopted by U.S. isolationists in the early 1940s. For those who know their history, this seems neither coincidental nor reassuring. |
Read more: | Read more: |
Read a letter in response to this piece: The worse angels of our nature | |
The Post’s View: The USMCA deal is a nice return to normalcy | The Post’s View: The USMCA deal is a nice return to normalcy |
The Post’s View: Trump again blows up a trade deal. Congress needs to step up. | The Post’s View: Trump again blows up a trade deal. Congress needs to step up. |
Robert J. Samuelson: Are Trump’s trade wars over — or just enjoying a truce? | Robert J. Samuelson: Are Trump’s trade wars over — or just enjoying a truce? |
Marc A. Thiessen: These have been the best few weeks of Trump’s presidency | Marc A. Thiessen: These have been the best few weeks of Trump’s presidency |
Max Boot: Trump’s smoke-and-mirrors trade deal with China | Max Boot: Trump’s smoke-and-mirrors trade deal with China |
Previous version
1
Next version