This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/23/us/politics/trump-impeachment-documents.html

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
With Trump Impeachment Trial in Limbo, Schumer Demands Emails and Documents With Trump Impeachment Trial in Limbo, Schumer Demands Emails and Documents
(32 minutes later)
With Republicans resisting any testimony by top White House officials at President Trump’s impeachment trial, Senator Chuck Schumer, the minority leader, issued a new demand on Monday, calling for specific documents including emails and other internal White House records to be subpoenaed as part of the proceedings. With Republicans resisting witness testimony, Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader, shifted his focus on Monday from witnesses to documents that he wants subpoenaed for President Trump’s impeachment trial.
In a letter to his Senate colleagues, Mr. Schumer laid out a long list of records that Democrats would like to see, including internal emails and documents from the White House, State Department and the Office of Management and Budget relating to the president’s effort to press Ukraine’s leader to investigate Mr. Trump’s political rivals.In a letter to his Senate colleagues, Mr. Schumer laid out a long list of records that Democrats would like to see, including internal emails and documents from the White House, State Department and the Office of Management and Budget relating to the president’s effort to press Ukraine’s leader to investigate Mr. Trump’s political rivals.
The letter was an effort to increase pressure on Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the majority leader, to negotiate with Democrats over the president’s trial on charges of “high crimes and misdemeanors.” The House voted last week to impeach Mr. Trump in connection with the Ukraine matter. The New York Democrat was trying to increase pressure on Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, to negotiate over the president’s trial on charges of “high crimes and misdemeanors.” The House voted last week to impeach Mr. Trump in connection with the Ukraine matter.
“There simply is no good reason why evidence that is directly relevant to the conduct at issue in the Articles of Impeachment should be withheld from the Senate and the American people,” Mr. Schumer, Democrat of New York, wrote in asking for the documents. “There simply is no good reason why evidence that is directly relevant to the conduct at issue in the Articles of Impeachment should be withheld from the Senate and the American people,” Mr. Schumer wrote in asking for the documents.
But Mr. McConnell, who has said he is “taking my cues” from the White House in shaping the trial, is not likely to agree to the demand. He already has rejected Mr. Schumer’s request for testimony from four White House officials — including John R. Bolton, Mr. Trump’s former national security adviser, and Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff.But Mr. McConnell, who has said he is “taking my cues” from the White House in shaping the trial, is not likely to agree to the demand. He already has rejected Mr. Schumer’s request for testimony from four White House officials — including John R. Bolton, Mr. Trump’s former national security adviser, and Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff.
“Do you think Chuck Schumer is impartial?" Mr. McConnell asked during an appearance Monday morning on “Fox and Friends.” He went on: “So let’s quit the charade. This is a political exercise.” “Do you think Chuck Schumer is impartial?” Mr. McConnell asked during an appearance Monday morning on “Fox and Friends.” He went on: “So let’s quit the charade. This is a political exercise.”
In his letter, sent while lawmakers are away from Washington during the holiday recess, Mr. Schumer took a shot at Mr. McConnell, who has said he would not be an impartial juror and has vowed that Mr. Trump would be acquitted.In his letter, sent while lawmakers are away from Washington during the holiday recess, Mr. Schumer took a shot at Mr. McConnell, who has said he would not be an impartial juror and has vowed that Mr. Trump would be acquitted.
“Relevant documentary evidence currently in the possession of the Administration will augment the existing evidentiary record and will allow Senators to reach judgments informed by all of the available facts,” Mr. Schumer wrote. “To oppose the admission of this evidence would be to turn a willfully blind eye to the facts, and would clearly be at odds with the obligation of Senators to ‘do impartial justice’ according to the oath we will all take in the impeachment trial.”“Relevant documentary evidence currently in the possession of the Administration will augment the existing evidentiary record and will allow Senators to reach judgments informed by all of the available facts,” Mr. Schumer wrote. “To oppose the admission of this evidence would be to turn a willfully blind eye to the facts, and would clearly be at odds with the obligation of Senators to ‘do impartial justice’ according to the oath we will all take in the impeachment trial.”
Mr. Schumer’s letter comes on the heels of newly-released emails showing that the White House asked officials to keep quiet over the suspension of military aid to Ukraine. Mr. Schumer’s letter comes on the heels of newly released emails showing that the White House asked officials to keep quiet over the suspension of military aid to Ukraine.
That request, the emails show, came just 90 minutes after a July 25 telephone call between Mr. Trump and President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. During the call, Mr. Trump asked Mr. Zelensky to “do us a favor, though,” and investigate former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Mr. Biden’s son, Hunter.That request, the emails show, came just 90 minutes after a July 25 telephone call between Mr. Trump and President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. During the call, Mr. Trump asked Mr. Zelensky to “do us a favor, though,” and investigate former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Mr. Biden’s son, Hunter.
The letter builds on one Mr. Schumer sent to Mr. McConnell on Dec. 15, in which he also asked for the Senate so subpoena documents, along with four witnesses. But that letter did not specify which records Mr. Schumer wanted. The letter builds on one Mr. Schumer sent to Mr. McConnell on Dec. 15, in which he also asked for the Senate to subpoena documents, along with four witnesses. But that letter did not specify which records Mr. Schumer wanted.
In the new letter, he put forth a specific list. His request for the White House includes “email communications, messages, memoranda and other records” related to the July 25 call, as well as White House records related to the whistle-blower complaint that sparked the House impeachment inquiry. In the new letter, he was specific. His request for the White House includes “email communications, messages, memoranda and other records” related to the July 25 call, as well as White House records related to the whistle-blower complaint that sparked the House impeachment inquiry.
From the State Department, he asked for “detailed notes, emails, text and WhatsApp messages, memorandums to file, and diplomatic cables pertinent to the investigation that State Department witnesses told the House are being withheld.”From the State Department, he asked for “detailed notes, emails, text and WhatsApp messages, memorandums to file, and diplomatic cables pertinent to the investigation that State Department witnesses told the House are being withheld.”
The Office of Management and Budget “is also in possession of highly relevant documents and communications related to this case,” Mr. Schumer wrote.The Office of Management and Budget “is also in possession of highly relevant documents and communications related to this case,” Mr. Schumer wrote.