This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/20/brexit-pm-asks-britons-to-move-on-as-mps-debate-withdrawal-bill

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Brexit: parliament passes withdrawal agreement bill by 124 majority Brexit: MPs pass withdrawal agreement bill by 124 majority
(about 4 hours later)
Bill passes second reading by 358 votes to 234 leaving UK on course to leave EU by end of JanuaryBill passes second reading by 358 votes to 234 leaving UK on course to leave EU by end of January
Parliament has passed a historic milestone towards leaving the European Union, backing Boris Johnson’s Brexit bill by a thumping majority of 124, a week after the Conservatives won a landslide victory in the general election. Britain has taken a pivotal step towards leaving the European Union as Boris Johnson was rewarded for the Conservatives’ thumping general election victory with a majority of 124 for his Brexit deal in the House of Commons.
After comfortably passing its second reading by 358 votes to 234, the withdrawal agreement bill is on track to complete its passage through both houses of parliament in time to allow Britain to leave the European Union at the end of January. Addressing MPs on Friday morning, the prime minister sought to draw a line under three years of bitter parliamentary conflict, urging his colleagues to “discard the old labels of leave and remain”.
The clear support for the bill signalled a decisive break with the parliamentary gridlock that marked the past two years. After comfortably passing its second reading by 358 votes to 234, the withdrawal agreement bill is on track to complete its passage through both houses of parliament in time to allow Brexit to happen at the end of January.
Opening the debate on his bill on Friday morning, the prime minister called on the British public to discard the labels of leave and remain. Charles Michel, the president of the European council, welcomed the vote, tweeting that it was an “important step in the article 50 ratification process”. He added: “A level playing field remains a must for any future relationship,” referring to the EU’s demand for fair competition in exchange for a free-trade agreement with zero tariffs and zero quotas.
“We come together as a new parliament to break the deadlock and finally to get Brexit done,” Johnson said. Johnson claimed that pressing ahead with Brexit would “allow the warmth and natural affection that we all share with our European neighbours to find renewed expression in one great new national project of building a deep, special and democratically accountable partnership with those nations we are proud to call our closest friends”.
He said the electorate’s decision to press ahead with leaving the EU “must not be seen as a victory for one party over another, or one faction or another. This is the time when we move on and discard the old labels of leave and remain.” If the next stages at Westminster go to plan, the European parliament is expected to ratify the withdrawal agreement on 29 January, paving the way for the UK to leave the bloc two days later.
In a characteristic literary aside, Johnson claimed the terms were “as defunct as Big-Enders and Little-Enders, and Montagues and Capulets at the end of the play” – terms from Gulliver’s Travels and Romeo and Juliet respectively. Jeremy Corbyn said Labour would continue to oppose the government’s Brexit deal, but six Labour MPs defied the party whip and voted with the government, and around 20 more deliberately abstained, including the shadow housing secretary, John Healey.
Responding to Johnson, the Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, confirmed his party would continue to oppose the bill – though some Labour MPs, including shadow cabinet members, have argued that the election result means they should support it and move on. In a statement on his website published shortly after the vote, Healey said: “In a Brexit referendum and a Brexit election the public have now been clear, and so should Labour: our fight must be about the type of Brexit and the huge difference between Labour and Conservative visions of our economy. Any question about whether Brexit goes ahead has been closed.”
Corbyn said: “This deal will be used as a battering ram to drive us down the path towards more deregulation and towards a toxic deal with Donald Trump that will sell out our NHS and push up the price of medicines. We remain certain there is a better and fairer way for Britain to leave the EU.” When the convincing result of the vote was announced, helped by more than 100 new recruits to the government benches, one Tory MP was caught on microphone exclaiming: “Back of the net.”
However, the Labour MP Emma Lewell-Buck signalled that she would support the bill, saying that after last week’s general election result, it was time to put an end to “opposition for opposition’s sake”. Tory MPs tweeted selfies of a packed voting lobby, swelled by the influx of new Conservative members.
The bill, which was published on Thursday, had been stripped of a series of promises the government had made previously in an attempt to get it through parliament before the election, including on workers’ rights. Johnson’s promise to “get Brexit done” formed the centrepiece of his election campaign.
Johnson insisted Britain’s right to make its own decisions on these issues was a key benefit of Brexit. “We will take advantage of these new freedoms to legislate in parallel on the environment, on workers’ and on consumer rights,” he said. “This vision of the United Kingdom’s independence, a vision that inspires so many, is now, if this parliament, this new parliament, allows, only hours from our grasp,” Johnson told the Commons. “The oven is on, so to speak, it is set at gas mark four, we can have it done by lunchtime, or late lunch.”
“The very essence of the opportunity of Brexit is that we will no longer outsource these decisions. With renewed national confidence, we will take those decisions ourselves and answer to those who sent us here. The Labour MP for Wigan, Lisa Nandy, who is preparing to enter the forthcoming leadership contest, told the Guardian she believed the party’s shift towards backing a second Brexit referendum – in which Keir Starmer, among others, was instrumental – was a key factor behind its defeat.
“This house should never doubt its ability to pioneer standards for the fourth industrial revolution, just as it did for the first.” “In all honesty, Brexit just played into the sense that we are adrift from communities like these, that we don’t speak for them, we don’t stand for them, we don’t understand them, and worse than that: we’re deeply disrespectful towards them. And that has been building for the last 15 to 20 years,” she said.
“It’s been a long time in the making, I hope it won’t take a long time to resolve. But it’s going to be a hard road back.”
Nandy voted against the bill on Friday, along with fellow leadership hopefuls Rebecca Long-Bailey, Keir Starmer, Clive Lewis and Emily Thornberry.
Corbyn acknowledged during Friday’s debate that voters had signalled they wanted an end to the Brexit deadlock, and said Labour would “respect that decision and move on”.
He said, however, that he was still asking Labour MPs to vote against the legislation because “we warned before the general election that the prime minister’s Brexit deal was a terrible deal for our country and we still believe it is a terrible deal today”.
He highlighted commitments that the prime minister had stripped from the legislation since MPs in the last parliament voted on the deal in October. These included promises on workers’ rights, on parliament’s role in scrutinising future trade negotiations, and on protecting child refugees.
“This deal will be used as a battering ram to drive us down the path towards more deregulation and towards a toxic deal with Donald Trump that will sell out our NHS and push up the price of medicines. We remain certain there is a better and fairer way for Britain to leave the EU,” Corbyn said.
Johnson had earlier rejected that idea, insisting that his intention was to maintain high standards of protection for workers’ rights and consumers, but to do so through domestic law, not by aligning with the EU.
Nandy attacked the downgrading of protections on child refugees, saying: “If he thinks that people in towns such as mine, who believe that we should deliver Brexit, want to see us turn our back on decency, tolerance, kindness, warmth and empathy, he is wrong.”
The shadow Brexit secretary, Keir Starmer, speaking at the end of the debate, echoed Johnson’s suggestion that it was time to move on from the leave-remain demarcation of the referendum campaign, despite himself having been an ardent remainer.
“As a result of the general election – as a result of the majority that the government have, and the mandate that they have – we are leaving the EU. We will have left the EU within the next six months, and whatever side we were on, or even if we were on no side at all, the leave-remain argument will go with us,” he said.
The South Shields MP, Emma Lewell-Buck, who was one of the six Labour MPs who chose to vote for the bill, said it was time for an end to “opposition for opposition’s sake”.
“My party’s catch-all Brexit policy failed. Today was, and still is, an opportunity to stop the procrastination and send a message to our lost voters – the voters that our party was created to give a voice to in parliament – that we do hear them, value them and genuinely want to rebuild their trust,” she said.
Lewell-Buck was joined in the aye lobby by Labour colleagues Jon Cruddas, Grahame Morris, Toby Perkins, Sarah Champion and Rosie Cooper.
Friday’s vote was on the second reading of the legislation, when MPs vote on whether they are willing in principle for a bill to proceed. Amendments can be made during later stages.
The Commons backed a previous draft of the bill at a second reading in October; but rejected the prime minister’s plan to rush it through parliament in just a few days, prompting him to press for a general election.