This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/18/movies/grinch-stole-christmas.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
How the Grinch Stole Our Hearts How the Grinch Stole Our Hearts
(about 5 hours later)
On Dec. 18, 1966, “How the Grinch Stole Christmas!” debuted on CBS. Based on the beloved book about a neon beast with a stingy heart, the animated special was dismissed as a trifle.On Dec. 18, 1966, “How the Grinch Stole Christmas!” debuted on CBS. Based on the beloved book about a neon beast with a stingy heart, the animated special was dismissed as a trifle.
Some lauded the animation and Boris Karloff’s throaty narration as the Grinch. Others panned it as a morality tale that paled when compared to the book written by Theodor Geisel, better known as Dr. Seuss. The New York Times was among those, calling it a “creation that should be left undisturbed on the printed page.” Some lauded the animation and Boris Karloff’s throaty narration as the Grinch. Others panned it as a morality tale that paled when compared with the book written by Theodor Geisel, better known as Dr. Seuss. The New York Times was among those, calling it a “creation that should be left undisturbed on the printed page.”
But in the more than 50 years since its debut, the animated special, directed by Chuck Jones and Ben Washam, has become a holiday classic and turned into a live-action movie, a Broadway musical, an updated animated film and a retailer’s fever dream of pantookas, fuzzle fuzz and fliffer bloofs.But in the more than 50 years since its debut, the animated special, directed by Chuck Jones and Ben Washam, has become a holiday classic and turned into a live-action movie, a Broadway musical, an updated animated film and a retailer’s fever dream of pantookas, fuzzle fuzz and fliffer bloofs.
In recent years, critics wholly embraced the original, giving it stellar reviews. (It has a 100 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes.) And the story’s popularity persists in reruns, touring shows and as a merchandising juggernaut. So much so, this year it inspired the title of a pulp romance novel.In recent years, critics wholly embraced the original, giving it stellar reviews. (It has a 100 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes.) And the story’s popularity persists in reruns, touring shows and as a merchandising juggernaut. So much so, this year it inspired the title of a pulp romance novel.
The Times has chronicled the many iterations of the Grinch over the years. The book, which was published in 1957, was inspired by a Redbook article by Dr. Seuss that came out the same year. But the story, with its feel-good message of kindness over consumerism, gained a wider audience on television in the 1960s when a surge of animated Christmas specials were aired.The Times has chronicled the many iterations of the Grinch over the years. The book, which was published in 1957, was inspired by a Redbook article by Dr. Seuss that came out the same year. But the story, with its feel-good message of kindness over consumerism, gained a wider audience on television in the 1960s when a surge of animated Christmas specials were aired.
“Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” premiered in 1964, created by Rankin/Bass Productions, then a popular animation company that used three-dimensional puppets. A year later, “A Charlie Brown Christmas” became the first special to feature characters from the “Peanuts” comic strip. Rankin/Bass produced other animated classics, including 1968’s “The Little Drummer Boy” and 1969’s “Frosty the Snowman,” which was drawn by hand.“Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” premiered in 1964, created by Rankin/Bass Productions, then a popular animation company that used three-dimensional puppets. A year later, “A Charlie Brown Christmas” became the first special to feature characters from the “Peanuts” comic strip. Rankin/Bass produced other animated classics, including 1968’s “The Little Drummer Boy” and 1969’s “Frosty the Snowman,” which was drawn by hand.
But it is “How the Grinch Stole Christmas!” that has had the most vibrant life, in part because of its secular message of togetherness. It tells the story of a furry, green beast who dressed as Santa Claus in a bid to scuttle Christmas in the village of Whoville. Despite his best efforts, the villagers prevailed and embraced him, particularly Cindy Lou Who, who caught the beast trying to stuff her family’s Christmas tree up a chimney.But it is “How the Grinch Stole Christmas!” that has had the most vibrant life, in part because of its secular message of togetherness. It tells the story of a furry, green beast who dressed as Santa Claus in a bid to scuttle Christmas in the village of Whoville. Despite his best efforts, the villagers prevailed and embraced him, particularly Cindy Lou Who, who caught the beast trying to stuff her family’s Christmas tree up a chimney.
Illustrated with spare line drawings, the book left much to the imagination. Not so with later movies. In 2000, Jim Carrey starred in a Technicolor extravaganza in which the characters seemed as wobbly as the story itself. The Times critic Stephen Holden described the movie then as “a depressing reminder that when Hollywood decides to lavish more than $100 million on a beloved children’s story, that money has to go somewhere.”Illustrated with spare line drawings, the book left much to the imagination. Not so with later movies. In 2000, Jim Carrey starred in a Technicolor extravaganza in which the characters seemed as wobbly as the story itself. The Times critic Stephen Holden described the movie then as “a depressing reminder that when Hollywood decides to lavish more than $100 million on a beloved children’s story, that money has to go somewhere.”
He called Mr. Carrey, who starred as the Grinch, “relentless.” Worse, he wrote, there were the over-the-top theatrics. The set, for one, was strung with 52,000 Christmas lights. “The movie is so clogged with kooky gadgetry and special effects and glitter and goo that watching it feels like being gridlocked at Toys ‘R’ Us during the Christmas rush,” Mr. Holden wrote.He called Mr. Carrey, who starred as the Grinch, “relentless.” Worse, he wrote, there were the over-the-top theatrics. The set, for one, was strung with 52,000 Christmas lights. “The movie is so clogged with kooky gadgetry and special effects and glitter and goo that watching it feels like being gridlocked at Toys ‘R’ Us during the Christmas rush,” Mr. Holden wrote.
The musical version that hit Broadway in 2006 fared a little better with Times critics, but not much. “At about 90 minutes the stage version suffers from a milder case of bloat,” Charles Isherwood wrote of the play. He called the musical “pleasing.” Still, he scoffed at its consumerist underpinnings. Never mind that the story is grounded in community and good cheer — the musical adaptation was sponsored by Target.The musical version that hit Broadway in 2006 fared a little better with Times critics, but not much. “At about 90 minutes the stage version suffers from a milder case of bloat,” Charles Isherwood wrote of the play. He called the musical “pleasing.” Still, he scoffed at its consumerist underpinnings. Never mind that the story is grounded in community and good cheer — the musical adaptation was sponsored by Target.
“That this edifying bit of wisdom is now being promulgated by a retail giant is just one of the merry paradoxes of our age,” Mr. Isherwood wrote. “Perhaps the vendors flogging $20 Grinch dolls in the theater’s aisles were doing so with tongues in cheek.”“That this edifying bit of wisdom is now being promulgated by a retail giant is just one of the merry paradoxes of our age,” Mr. Isherwood wrote. “Perhaps the vendors flogging $20 Grinch dolls in the theater’s aisles were doing so with tongues in cheek.”
Last year, Illumination, the makers of the “Despicable Me” franchise, created an animated version of “How the Grinch Stole Christmas!” This time, critics were more forgiving. There was little talk of consumerism. The Grinch’s dog, Max, had charm. Mostly, though, the film, which starred Benedict Cumberbatch as the Grinch, was described as bland.Last year, Illumination, the makers of the “Despicable Me” franchise, created an animated version of “How the Grinch Stole Christmas!” This time, critics were more forgiving. There was little talk of consumerism. The Grinch’s dog, Max, had charm. Mostly, though, the film, which starred Benedict Cumberbatch as the Grinch, was described as bland.
Nothing, it seemed, would compare to the 1966 television special. Or, as Mr. Isherwood put it back in 2006, “If there is a more wholly satisfying half-hour of entertainment to be had in our dark world, I’d like to know what it is.”Nothing, it seemed, would compare to the 1966 television special. Or, as Mr. Isherwood put it back in 2006, “If there is a more wholly satisfying half-hour of entertainment to be had in our dark world, I’d like to know what it is.”