This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/09/business/democrats-close-to-agreement-with-white-house-on-new-nafta.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Democrats Close to Agreement With White House on New NAFTA Democrats Close to Agreement With White House on New NAFTA
(about 5 hours later)
WASHINGTON — Democratic lawmakers are nearing an agreement to bring the revised North American free trade deal to a vote after securing additional labor, enforcement and other provisions and winning the support of top labor leaders.WASHINGTON — Democratic lawmakers are nearing an agreement to bring the revised North American free trade deal to a vote after securing additional labor, enforcement and other provisions and winning the support of top labor leaders.
An agreement between congressional Democrats and the White House on the final terms of the revised trade deal would lift the last remaining hurdle standing in the way of enacting President Trump’s trade pact. It would cap off more than two years of negotiations between officials in the United States, Canada and Mexico over a critical trade pact that governs commerce around North America. An agreement between congressional Democrats and the White House on the final terms of the revised trade deal would lift the last remaining hurdle to enacting President Trump’s trade pact. It would also cap off more than two years of negotiations between officials in the United States, Canada and Mexico over a critical agreement that governs commerce around North America.
Congressional aides and trade advisers said they were still reviewing the final provisions of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement on Monday morning, but a resolution appeared to be close at hand. Congressional aides and trade advisers said they were still reviewing the final provisions of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, but a resolution appeared to be close at hand. The group of House Democrats negotiating changes to the pact emerged from Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office Monday night optimistic that an announcement could come as early as Tuesday.
In a weekly meeting with Senate Republican aides Monday morning, a White House official said that Robert Lighthizer, the United States trade representative, was involved in intense talks with both House Democrats and the Mexican Senate and a breakthrough could be reached as early as Monday, according to two people in the room who requested anonymity to discuss a private meeting. “I hope that we will be able to give you some verification on it tomorrow,” said Representative Richard E. Neal, Democrat of Massachusetts and the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, adding that he was “delighted” with the agreement. Mr. Neal ticked off multiple phone calls with Robert Lighthizer, the United States trade representative, and Ms. Pelosi over the weekend — including a call with Ms. Pelosi in the middle of Sunday’s New England Patriots game — about the trade deal.
“We have constructed, I believe, a template for the future,” Mr. Neal said, declining to elaborate on the deal’s specifics. “Many of the things that people said could never be in an agreement are in this agreement.”
Ms. Pelosi told reporters that a deal was not final, but indicated that those involved in negotiations were close.
In a weekly meeting with Senate Republican aides Monday morning, a White House official said Mr. Lighthizer was involved in intense talks with both House Democrats and the Mexican Senate, according to two people in the room who requested anonymity to discuss a private meeting.
The official, Jessica Ditto, the White House’s deputy communications director, said in the meeting that the revised pact included tough labor enforcement provisions that should help address one of the main concerns that House Democrats have raised in monthslong negotiations with Mr. Lighthizer.The official, Jessica Ditto, the White House’s deputy communications director, said in the meeting that the revised pact included tough labor enforcement provisions that should help address one of the main concerns that House Democrats have raised in monthslong negotiations with Mr. Lighthizer.
Mr. Lighthizer and Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and a senior adviser, are expected to head to Mexico on Tuesday morning, according to an administration official. It is unclear what prompted the trip, which will also include Mr. Lighthizer’s deputy, C.J. Mahoney. Mr. Lighthizer and Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and a senior adviser, are expected to head to Mexico on Tuesday morning, according to an administration official. Chrystia Freeland, who negotiated the deal on behalf of Canada and is now deputy prime minister, will also travel Mexico City at the invitation of the Mexican government, according to a Canadian spokesman. Marcelo Ebrard, the Mexican foreign minister, said in a tweet late Monday that negotiating teams would meet at noon in Mexico City to announce the advances to the agreement.
Both the White House and congressional aides have said in recent days that a deal could come shortly, and are pressing for a vote before Christmas. Both the White House and congressional aides have said in recent days that a deal could come shortly, and are pressing for a vote before Christmas. Pressed on timing, Mr. Neal said he thought a vote before the end of the year remained possible.
Labor union leaders, who have long criticized the existing North American trade deal and Mr. Trump’s proposed changes to it, also struck a more positive note.Labor union leaders, who have long criticized the existing North American trade deal and Mr. Trump’s proposed changes to it, also struck a more positive note.
Richard Trumka, the president of the AFL-CIO, said in an email to The Washington Post on Monday morning that there was a deal, adding “we have pushed them hard and have done quite well.” Mr. Trumka said he would meet with the labor union’s executive council Monday afternoon to discuss it. Richard Trumka, the president of the A.F.L.-C.I.O., said in an email to The Washington Post on Monday morning that there was a deal, adding “we have pushed them hard and have done quite well.” Mr. Trumka said he would meet with the labor union’s executive council Monday afternoon to discuss it.
People familiar with the negotiations said Mr. Trumka would likely seek approval from the AFL-CIO’s leadership, one of the last remaining obstacles to securing Democratic support. The AFL-CIO did not respond to a request for comment. People familiar with the negotiations said Mr. Trumka would likely seek approval from the A.F.L.-C.I.O.’s leadership, one of the last remaining obstacles to securing Democratic support. The A.F.L.-C.I.O. did not respond to a request for comment.
Congressional approval of the USMCA would constitute Mr. Trump’s biggest trade win to date and give him a big talking point as he seeks re-election in 2020. Mr. Trump, who has long criticized NAFTA as one of the “worst” trade deals ever reached, promised as a candidate in 2016 to rip it up and replace it with something that did more to help American workers. Congressional approval of the agreement would constitute Mr. Trump’s biggest trade win to date and give him a big talking point as he seeks re-election in 2020. Mr. Trump, who has long criticized NAFTA as one of the “worst” trade deals ever reached, promised as a candidate in 2016 to rip it up and replace it with something that did more to help American workers.
“Nobody can say it’s ‘NAFTA-light’ anymore,” said Representative Jimmy Gomez, Democrat of California. “This is completely different.”
But it would also give Democrats a tangible accomplishment amid a bitter impeachment fight and long-sought policy changes to a trade pact they have criticized as prioritizing corporations over workers. Many of the freshman Democrats who flipped Republican districts in 2018 have lobbied for a vote on the deal before Christmas, particularly as the House grows closer to voting on articles of impeachment.But it would also give Democrats a tangible accomplishment amid a bitter impeachment fight and long-sought policy changes to a trade pact they have criticized as prioritizing corporations over workers. Many of the freshman Democrats who flipped Republican districts in 2018 have lobbied for a vote on the deal before Christmas, particularly as the House grows closer to voting on articles of impeachment.
While the Trump administration reached an agreement with Canada and Mexico a year ago, the deal requires congressional approval, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi and a tight-knit group of Democrats have insisted on putting their own stamp on the pact before bringing it for a vote. They have spent months pressing Mr. Lighthizer to strengthen the deal’s protections for labor and the environment, ensure that its rules can be enforced, and strip out a provision they call a giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry.While the Trump administration reached an agreement with Canada and Mexico a year ago, the deal requires congressional approval, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi and a tight-knit group of Democrats have insisted on putting their own stamp on the pact before bringing it for a vote. They have spent months pressing Mr. Lighthizer to strengthen the deal’s protections for labor and the environment, ensure that its rules can be enforced, and strip out a provision they call a giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry.
Republicans have repeatedly hammered Ms. Pelosi for not bringing the agreement to the floor for a vote sooner.Republicans have repeatedly hammered Ms. Pelosi for not bringing the agreement to the floor for a vote sooner.
Even if an agreement in principal is announced this week, House Democrats will have to finalize the implementing legislation needed to codify the trade pact before putting it up for a vote on the House floor, though some procedural hurdles could be waived in order to speed the process through both chambers. There are less than 10 legislative days remaining before lawmakers are scheduled to leave Washington for the holidays.Even if an agreement in principal is announced this week, House Democrats will have to finalize the implementing legislation needed to codify the trade pact before putting it up for a vote on the House floor, though some procedural hurdles could be waived in order to speed the process through both chambers. There are less than 10 legislative days remaining before lawmakers are scheduled to leave Washington for the holidays.
The terms of the deal have yet to be announced, and it is not yet clear how the negotiations will change the 2,082-page agreement announced by Canada, Mexico and the United States last year.The terms of the deal have yet to be announced, and it is not yet clear how the negotiations will change the 2,082-page agreement announced by Canada, Mexico and the United States last year.
In recent weeks, the administration has also been tasked with taking those revisions to Canada and Mexico, who must sign off on the final deal.In recent weeks, the administration has also been tasked with taking those revisions to Canada and Mexico, who must sign off on the final deal.
On Sunday, Mexican Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard said that Mexico had drawn several red lines on revisions, including a blanket rejection of foreign labor inspectors in Mexican factories. Speaking to Mexican senators, Mr. Ebrard said that Mexico would accept three-person panels to resolve disputes, not only for labor issues but also for other controversies. On Sunday, Mr. Ebrard said Mexico had drawn several red lines on revisions, including a blanket rejection of foreign labor inspectors in Mexican factories. Speaking to Mexican senators, Mr. Ebrard said Mexico would accept three-person panels to resolve disputes, not only for labor issues but also for other controversies.
Mexico and the United States have also sparred over a late American proposal that steel and aluminum used to make cars would be smelted in North America, not just finished here. USMCA requires automakers to purchase 70 percent of the steel and aluminum they use from North American sources to qualify for the pact’s zero tariffs. Mexico and the United States have also sparred over a late American proposal that steel and aluminum used to make cars would be smelted in North America, not just finished here. The new agreement requires automakers to purchase 70 percent of the steel and aluminum they use from North American sources to qualify for the pact’s zero tariffs.
Mr. Ebrard said Sunday that “Mexico has shared that this would create many problems.” He said that Mexico would accept the limit for steel five years after the agreement took effect, but not on aluminum.Mr. Ebrard said Sunday that “Mexico has shared that this would create many problems.” He said that Mexico would accept the limit for steel five years after the agreement took effect, but not on aluminum.
Ana Swanson, Emily Cochrane and Maggie Haberman reported from Washington, and Elisabeth Malkin from Mexico City.Ana Swanson, Emily Cochrane and Maggie Haberman reported from Washington, and Elisabeth Malkin from Mexico City.