This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-50067855

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Extinction Rebellion activists begin legal fight over protest ban Extinction Rebellion: Celebrity backers admit 'hypocrisy'
(about 1 hour later)
Extinction Rebellion activists have launched legal action over the police's decision to ban them from demonstrating anywhere in London. Celebrity Extinction Rebellion supporters have admitted in an open letter being "hypocrites" over their high-carbon lifestyles.
Their lawyers submitted an application to the High Court for a judicial review which they hope will be heard later. Stars including Jude Law said their guilt is shared with everyone in "this fossil-fuel economy" and urged people to campaign for "systemic change".
It comes as Extinction Rebellion launches a legal challenge against a London-wide ban on its protests.
Some have defied the ban, including a group of mothers and babies.
Jude Law and Benedict Cumberbatch are among more than 100 celebrity supporters of Extinction Rebellion who signed an open letter to the media.
Along with Steve Coogan, Bob Geldof, Sir Mark Rylance, and Ray Winstone, they confessed their culpability in the climate crisis.
The letter says: "Dear journalists who have called us hypocrites. You're right.
"We live high carbon lives and the industries that we are part of have huge carbon footprints.
"Like you, and everyone else, we are stuck in this fossil-fuel economy and without systemic change, our lifestyles will keep on causing climate and ecological harm."
But they called on the media to focus on the "more urgent story" of life on earth dying in a sixth mass extinction.
They said they cannot ignore the call of young people such as Greta Thunberg to "fight for their already devastated future", even if it means putting themselves "in your firing line".
Writers Ian McEwan and Michael Morpurgo also signed the letter.
Protest ban
Meanwhile, lawyers for Extinction Rebellion activists have launched a High Court action over the police decision to prevent them demonstrating anywhere in London.
The claimants include the Green Party's Caroline Lucas and Baroness Jenny Jones, Labour MPs Clive Lewis and David Drew and writer George Monbiot.The claimants include the Green Party's Caroline Lucas and Baroness Jenny Jones, Labour MPs Clive Lewis and David Drew and writer George Monbiot.
There have been more than 1,600 arrests over the ongoing protests, police said. The Metropolitan Police said they made more than 1,600 arrests in the ongoing protests, and on Monday they announced new restrictions under Section 14 of the Public Order Act.
The Metropolitan Police began clearing protesters from Trafalgar Square on Monday evening. The order required protestors to disperse by 21:00 BST or risk arrest.
It followed the announcement of new restrictions under Section 14 of the Public Order Act, which required activists to stop their protests in central London by 21:00 BST or risk arrest.
Any assembly of more than two people linked to the Extinction Rebellion action is now illegal in London.Any assembly of more than two people linked to the Extinction Rebellion action is now illegal in London.
The force said it decided to impose the rules after "continued breaches" of conditions which limited the demonstrations to Trafalgar Square.The force said it decided to impose the rules after "continued breaches" of conditions which limited the demonstrations to Trafalgar Square.
Despite the ban, protesters plan to gather again in Trafalgar Square on Wednesday lunchtime.
Deputy Assistant Commissioner Laurence Taylor, who is leading the policing of the demonstrations, said he was confident the Met's decision was "entirely lawful" and "entirely proportionate".Deputy Assistant Commissioner Laurence Taylor, who is leading the policing of the demonstrations, said he was confident the Met's decision was "entirely lawful" and "entirely proportionate".
Officers would respond in a "balanced and proportionate" way towards anyone assembling in Trafalgar Square, he said, but added they would be "liable to arrest". Defiant demonstrators
'Concern' over ban
Extinction Rebellion argue the ban is disproportionate and an unprecedented curtailment of the right to free speech and free assembly.Extinction Rebellion argue the ban is disproportionate and an unprecedented curtailment of the right to free speech and free assembly.
The group hopes the High Court will quash the decision to implement the blanket ban.The group hopes the High Court will quash the decision to implement the blanket ban.
Mothers and babies were among those defying the London-wide ban on Wednesday. In London's King's Cross on Wednesday, a group of mothers and babies defied the restriction, staging a "feed-in" outside Google's offices, while other activists targeted the nearby offices of YouTube - a Google subsidiary.
They staged a "feed-in" outside Google's offices in London's King's Cross, aiming to highlight the company's political donations to organisations that have campaigned against action on climate change. They said they wanted to highlight the company's political donations to organisations that have campaigned against action on climate change.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said concerns had been raised about the police's decision, adding that shadow home secretary Diane Abbott was discussing it with the police. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said concerns had been raised about the police's decision to ban the protests, adding that shadow home secretary Diane Abbott was discussing it with the police.
"I think it's important to protect the right of free speech, and the right to demonstrate in our society - obviously in a non-violent way," he said."I think it's important to protect the right of free speech, and the right to demonstrate in our society - obviously in a non-violent way," he said.
He added that Labour's London Mayor Sadiq Khan had no involvement in the "operational decision" by police to remove the protesters.He added that Labour's London Mayor Sadiq Khan had no involvement in the "operational decision" by police to remove the protesters.
On Tuesday, Mr Khan said he was "seeking further information" about why the ban was necessary, saying he believed "the right to peaceful and lawful protest must always be upheld".On Tuesday, Mr Khan said he was "seeking further information" about why the ban was necessary, saying he believed "the right to peaceful and lawful protest must always be upheld".
A government spokesman said the UK was already taking "world-leading action to combat climate change as the first major economy to legislate to end our contribution to global warming entirely by 2050".A government spokesman said the UK was already taking "world-leading action to combat climate change as the first major economy to legislate to end our contribution to global warming entirely by 2050".
"While we share people's concerns about global warming, and respect the right to peaceful protest, it should not disrupt people's day-to-day lives," he added."While we share people's concerns about global warming, and respect the right to peaceful protest, it should not disrupt people's day-to-day lives," he added.
What are the rules around protests?What are the rules around protests?
Police have the powers to ban a protest under the Public Order Act 1986, if a senior officer has reasonable belief that it may cause "serious disruption to the life of the community".Police have the powers to ban a protest under the Public Order Act 1986, if a senior officer has reasonable belief that it may cause "serious disruption to the life of the community".
Police are also under a duty to balance the task of keeping the streets open with the right freedom of assembly under Article 11 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and freedom of expression, under Article 10. These rights are not absolute - the state can curtail them.Police are also under a duty to balance the task of keeping the streets open with the right freedom of assembly under Article 11 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and freedom of expression, under Article 10. These rights are not absolute - the state can curtail them.
However, the BBC's home affairs correspondent Dominic Casciani said: "The test, if and when it gets to a human rights court battle, is whether police action was proportionate to the threat and only what was strictly necessary."However, the BBC's home affairs correspondent Dominic Casciani said: "The test, if and when it gets to a human rights court battle, is whether police action was proportionate to the threat and only what was strictly necessary."
By law, the organiser of a public march must tell the police certain information in writing six days in advance.By law, the organiser of a public march must tell the police certain information in writing six days in advance.
Police have the power to limit or change the route of the march or set other conditions.Police have the power to limit or change the route of the march or set other conditions.
A Section 14 notice issued under the Public Order Act allows police to impose conditions on a static protest and individuals who fail to comply with these can be arrested.A Section 14 notice issued under the Public Order Act allows police to impose conditions on a static protest and individuals who fail to comply with these can be arrested.