This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/15/us/politics/democratic-debate-live.html

The article has changed 19 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 8 Version 9
Watch the Debate Live: Democrats Take Shots at Warren, Not Biden Watch the Debate Live: Democrats Take Shots at Warren, Not Biden
(32 minutes later)
Throughout the primary, Ms. Warren has lead the field in her aggressive stance to break up big tech companies like Amazon, Google and Facebook and she did so again on Tuesday.
“I’m not willing to give up and let a handful of monopolist dominated our economy and our democracy,” she said.
Ms. Warren walked through Amazon’s role as a product marketplace and product seller.
“You get to be the umpire in the baseball game or you get to have a team. You don’t get to be both at the same time,” she said.
While her Democratic rivals do want to go as far, most agree with the sentiment. Mr. O’Rourke said they should not call out particular companies. Mr. Yang said breaking up companies would not solve problems, rattling off a joke that grew broad laughs.
“There is a reason why no one is using Bing today,” he said. “Sorry Microsoft.”
Mr. Booker, meanwhile. called for “regulation and reform,” while acknowledging that tech companies represent a “massive problem in our democracy.”
As the debate approached the end of the second hour, Bernie Sanders was asked directly to reassure the American people about his health two weeks after a heart attack. But before the moderator Erin Burnett could get the question out, Mr. Sanders delivered his answer. “I’m healthy, I’m feeling great,” he said.
Cory Booker interjected with a joke that Mr. Sanders also supports medical marijuana.”
I’m not on it tonight,” Mr. Sanders retorted.
When Ms. Burnett then asked the question, Mr. Sanders invited people to his rally this weekend in New York. “We are going to be mounting a vigorous campaign all over this country. That is how I think I can reassure the American people,” he said, thanking his rivals for their “love” and “prayers.”
“I just want to thank you from the bottom of my heart, and I’m so happy to be back here with you this evening,” he said to applause.
The opioid discussion that just took place is a good exhibit of why some of the most vexing issues facing the presidential candidates is so difficult as a debate topic.
Amy Klobuchar and Tom Steyer each bemoaned prescription drug companies for pushing prescription opioids on Americans to enrich themselves, but didn’t reveal much contrast between themselves or their onstage opponents, or even Mr. Trump.
Yet this is a topic that hits home for millions of Americans and one that candidates are asked about frequently on the campaign trail. It’s a serious problem without easily digestible solutions.
There’s a lot of agreement onstage, with little understanding of what, exactly any of the candidates would do.
Beto O’Rourke and Pete Buttigieg sparred aggressively over guns in an intense and personal exchange. Mr. O’Rourke has called for the mandatory buyback of assault weapons by the government. Mr. Buttigieg has called that unrealistic and a plan that damages the Democratic Party.
“If the logic begins with those weapons being too dangerous to sell, then it must continue by acknowledging with 16 million AR-15s and AK-47s out there, they are also too dangerous to own,” Mr. O’Rourke said. “Every single one of them is a potential instrument of terror.”
But Mr. O’Rourke struggled to say how he would handle taking the guns from Americans who do not want to give up those weapons. “Congressman, you just made it clear that you don’t know how this is actually going to take weapons off the streets,” Mr. Buttigieg said. “We can’t wait, we can’t wait for universal background checks.”
“We cannot wait for purity tests,” he concluded, “We just have to get something done.”
After Mr. O’Rourke said it was time to stop listening to polls and be bold, Mr. Buttigieg jumped back in. “I don’t need lessons from you on courage,” Mr. Buttigieg said, saying the real problem was the National Rifle Association, whom they should unite against. He said Democrats could conceivably ban assault weapons and not get “wrapped around the axle” of mandatory buybacks.
“If you’re not going door to door, it’s not mandatory,” Mr. Castro said, opposing the plan, noting that in many communities the idea of police knocking on doors has also led to violence.
Joe Biden tried once again to present himself as the person onstage with the most direct foreign policy experience.Joe Biden tried once again to present himself as the person onstage with the most direct foreign policy experience.
“I may be the only person who has spent extensive time alone with Putin and Erdogan,” he said, referring to the Russian and Turkish leaders.“I may be the only person who has spent extensive time alone with Putin and Erdogan,” he said, referring to the Russian and Turkish leaders.
During two opportunities to discuss the current situation in Syrian, Mr. Biden didn’t exactly say whether he’d send additional American troops to quell the fighting along the Syria-Turkey border, but blamed Mr. Trump for inflaming a tense situation.During two opportunities to discuss the current situation in Syrian, Mr. Biden didn’t exactly say whether he’d send additional American troops to quell the fighting along the Syria-Turkey border, but blamed Mr. Trump for inflaming a tense situation.
“We have an erratic, crazy president who knows not a damn thing about foreign policy and operates under his own fear for re-election,” he said.“We have an erratic, crazy president who knows not a damn thing about foreign policy and operates under his own fear for re-election,” he said.
Democrat after Democrat piled onto Mr. Trump on international affairs.Democrat after Democrat piled onto Mr. Trump on international affairs.
“This president is turning the moral leadership of this country into a dumpster fire,” Senator Cory Booker said.“This president is turning the moral leadership of this country into a dumpster fire,” Senator Cory Booker said.
“This president is caging kids on the border and letting ISIS prisoners run free,” added Julián Castro.“This president is caging kids on the border and letting ISIS prisoners run free,” added Julián Castro.
Pete Buttigieg, Beto O’Rourke and Amy Klobuchar, three candidates who sorely need to boost themselves in the polls, have adopted the same strategy tonight: Go after Elizabeth Warren.Pete Buttigieg, Beto O’Rourke and Amy Klobuchar, three candidates who sorely need to boost themselves in the polls, have adopted the same strategy tonight: Go after Elizabeth Warren.
All three sought to contrast themselves and their plans with Ms. Warren, with Mr. O’Rourke arguing the Massachusetts senator is “more interested in being punitive” than offering a positive vision. Ms. Klobuchar has twice offered “a reality check to Elizabeth.” And Mr. Buttigieg scolded her for not saying whether her health care plan will raise middle class taxes.All three sought to contrast themselves and their plans with Ms. Warren, with Mr. O’Rourke arguing the Massachusetts senator is “more interested in being punitive” than offering a positive vision. Ms. Klobuchar has twice offered “a reality check to Elizabeth.” And Mr. Buttigieg scolded her for not saying whether her health care plan will raise middle class taxes.
Ms. Warren, a polling co-leader with Mr. Biden, serves a useful foil for the three aiming to occupy the party’s moderate lane. Ms. Klobuchar and Mr. O’Rourke are in danger of missing next month’s debate, while Mr. Buttigieg is trying to lift himself into the field of front-runners.Ms. Warren, a polling co-leader with Mr. Biden, serves a useful foil for the three aiming to occupy the party’s moderate lane. Ms. Klobuchar and Mr. O’Rourke are in danger of missing next month’s debate, while Mr. Buttigieg is trying to lift himself into the field of front-runners.
By contrast, there were few attacks on Mr. Biden, who took much of the incoming fire from rivals in the past debates. Going after Ms. Warren lets the would-be moderate standard-bearers avoid a contrast with Mr. Biden, particularly on the Ukraine issue where he has become vulnerable. Attacking Ms. Warren serves as a rehearsal for the party’s moderate voters of how the candidates would fare against her in a presumed one-on-one matchup much later in the primary process.By contrast, there were few attacks on Mr. Biden, who took much of the incoming fire from rivals in the past debates. Going after Ms. Warren lets the would-be moderate standard-bearers avoid a contrast with Mr. Biden, particularly on the Ukraine issue where he has become vulnerable. Attacking Ms. Warren serves as a rehearsal for the party’s moderate voters of how the candidates would fare against her in a presumed one-on-one matchup much later in the primary process.
It also shows which of the liberal candidate is feared most by the moderates. It’s no longer Bernie Sanders, it is only Ms. Warren.It also shows which of the liberal candidate is feared most by the moderates. It’s no longer Bernie Sanders, it is only Ms. Warren.
Mr. Booker and Ms. Harris both came into the debate struggling for support and attention. And it was apparent by the end of the first hour that they had adopted a similar game plan: seeking to rise about the fray and food fight unfolding around them.Mr. Booker and Ms. Harris both came into the debate struggling for support and attention. And it was apparent by the end of the first hour that they had adopted a similar game plan: seeking to rise about the fray and food fight unfolding around them.
“Tearing each other down because we have a different plan is unacceptable,” Mr. Booker said at one point, saying Democratic infighting would be “a disaster for us.”“Tearing each other down because we have a different plan is unacceptable,” Mr. Booker said at one point, saying Democratic infighting would be “a disaster for us.”
Earlier, Mr. Booker had been the first candidate to castigate the media for asking Mr. Biden questions about his son’s work in Ukraine.Earlier, Mr. Booker had been the first candidate to castigate the media for asking Mr. Biden questions about his son’s work in Ukraine.
“I feel like I’m having déjà vu up here,” Mr. Booker said, lashing Mr. Trump for circulating false allegations.“I feel like I’m having déjà vu up here,” Mr. Booker said, lashing Mr. Trump for circulating false allegations.
At one point, Ms. Harris aired a complaint that women’s advocates have pressed for months: the lack of questions about abortion.At one point, Ms. Harris aired a complaint that women’s advocates have pressed for months: the lack of questions about abortion.
“This is the sixth debate we have had in this presidential cycle. Not one word with all of these discussions about health care, on women’s access to health care. It’s outrageous,” Ms. Harris said to cheers.“This is the sixth debate we have had in this presidential cycle. Not one word with all of these discussions about health care, on women’s access to health care. It’s outrageous,” Ms. Harris said to cheers.
Tulsi Gabbard attacked The New York Times, CNN, the “mainstream media” and others who have written about how Russians are praising her and encouraging her presidential campaign.Tulsi Gabbard attacked The New York Times, CNN, the “mainstream media” and others who have written about how Russians are praising her and encouraging her presidential campaign.
“Just two days ago The New York Times put out an article saying that I’m a Russian asset and an Assad apologist and all these different smears,” Ms. Gabbard said. “This morning a CNN commentator said on national television that I’m an asset of Russia. Completely despicable.”“Just two days ago The New York Times put out an article saying that I’m a Russian asset and an Assad apologist and all these different smears,” Ms. Gabbard said. “This morning a CNN commentator said on national television that I’m an asset of Russia. Completely despicable.”
The Times article did not describe Ms. Gabbard in these ways. It noted that she has drawn support from Russian state news media sources and others in that country, as well as white nationalist and members of the alt-right.The Times article did not describe Ms. Gabbard in these ways. It noted that she has drawn support from Russian state news media sources and others in that country, as well as white nationalist and members of the alt-right.
Her broadside came in response to a question about whether additional U.S. troops should be sent to protect Kurdish communities in Syria, who are under attack by Turkish troops following Mr. Trump pulling U.S. forces out of the country.Her broadside came in response to a question about whether additional U.S. troops should be sent to protect Kurdish communities in Syria, who are under attack by Turkish troops following Mr. Trump pulling U.S. forces out of the country.
Ms. Gabbard repeatedly invoked the phrase “regime change war” to describe American policy abroad and in the Middle East in particular.Ms. Gabbard repeatedly invoked the phrase “regime change war” to describe American policy abroad and in the Middle East in particular.
“As president I will end these regime change wars by doing two things — ending the draconian sanctions that are really a modern day siege, the likes of which we are seeing Saudi Arabia wage against Yemen that have caused tens of thousands of Syrian civilians to die and to starve,” she said. “And I would make sure we stop supporting terrorists like Al Qaeda in Syria who’ve been the ground force in this ongoing regime change war.”“As president I will end these regime change wars by doing two things — ending the draconian sanctions that are really a modern day siege, the likes of which we are seeing Saudi Arabia wage against Yemen that have caused tens of thousands of Syrian civilians to die and to starve,” she said. “And I would make sure we stop supporting terrorists like Al Qaeda in Syria who’ve been the ground force in this ongoing regime change war.”
Mr. Buttigieg, who like Ms. Gabbard is a military veteran, sharply disagreed.Mr. Buttigieg, who like Ms. Gabbard is a military veteran, sharply disagreed.
“Well, respectfully, congresswoman, I think that is dead wrong. The slaughter going on in Syria is not a consequence of American presence, it’s a consequence of a withdrawal and a betrayal by this president, of American allies and American values,” he said.“Well, respectfully, congresswoman, I think that is dead wrong. The slaughter going on in Syria is not a consequence of American presence, it’s a consequence of a withdrawal and a betrayal by this president, of American allies and American values,” he said.
Bernie Sanders got a question right in his wheelhouse: Should billionaires exist? He didn’t quite say yes but did launch into his regular tirade against the ultra-wealthy, saying it is “a moral and economic outrage” that the three richest Americans control as much wealth as half the country.Bernie Sanders got a question right in his wheelhouse: Should billionaires exist? He didn’t quite say yes but did launch into his regular tirade against the ultra-wealthy, saying it is “a moral and economic outrage” that the three richest Americans control as much wealth as half the country.
Mr. Steyer, himself a billionaire, went next. He denounced corporate power and blamed Republicans for passing legislation cutting taxes for the wealthy.Mr. Steyer, himself a billionaire, went next. He denounced corporate power and blamed Republicans for passing legislation cutting taxes for the wealthy.
“The results are as shameful as Senator Sanders said,” he said. “It’s absolutely wrong, undemocratic and unfair.”“The results are as shameful as Senator Sanders said,” he said. “It’s absolutely wrong, undemocratic and unfair.”
Ms. Warren then weighed in: “My question is not why do Bernie and I support a wealth tax, it’s why doesn’t — does everyone else on this stage — think it’s more important to protect billionaires than it is to invest in an entire generation.”Ms. Warren then weighed in: “My question is not why do Bernie and I support a wealth tax, it’s why doesn’t — does everyone else on this stage — think it’s more important to protect billionaires than it is to invest in an entire generation.”
Mr. Biden then remarked, “No one is supporting billionaires.”Mr. Biden then remarked, “No one is supporting billionaires.”
Ms. Warren didn’t quite roll her eyes, but she threw him a side eye.Ms. Warren didn’t quite roll her eyes, but she threw him a side eye.
Ms. Klobuchar weighed in soon after: “I want to give a reality check here to Elizabeth. No one on this stage wants to protect billionaires. Not even the billionaire wants to protect billionaires. We have different approaches. Your idea is not the only idea.”Ms. Klobuchar weighed in soon after: “I want to give a reality check here to Elizabeth. No one on this stage wants to protect billionaires. Not even the billionaire wants to protect billionaires. We have different approaches. Your idea is not the only idea.”
The Democrats onstage mostly agree on economic policy but they disagreed over how to address the growing issue of automation replacing jobs, and the severity of threat that automation poses.The Democrats onstage mostly agree on economic policy but they disagreed over how to address the growing issue of automation replacing jobs, and the severity of threat that automation poses.
Ms. Warren said that automation was not a central issue, saying economic data suggested trade was a bigger issue.Ms. Warren said that automation was not a central issue, saying economic data suggested trade was a bigger issue.
“The principle reason has been bad trade policy,” Ms. Warren said of job losses.“The principle reason has been bad trade policy,” Ms. Warren said of job losses.
Mr. Yang, who has made addressing automation a central issue, disagreed, saying Americans can see the issue playing out in front of them. “They see a self-serve kiosk in every McDonald’s,” he said, as millions of truckers worry about self-driving cars.Mr. Yang, who has made addressing automation a central issue, disagreed, saying Americans can see the issue playing out in front of them. “They see a self-serve kiosk in every McDonald’s,” he said, as millions of truckers worry about self-driving cars.
Mr. Yang said downplaying automation was “Ignoring the realities that Americans see around them every single day.”Mr. Yang said downplaying automation was “Ignoring the realities that Americans see around them every single day.”
Mr. Sanders, meanwhile, pledged a job for everyone who loses one through automation.Mr. Sanders, meanwhile, pledged a job for everyone who loses one through automation.
“Damn right we will,” Mr. Sanders said.“Damn right we will,” Mr. Sanders said.
The health care discussion showed the greater schism in the Democratic Party. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are on the side of eliminating private health insurance and installing a Medicare for all system, while Joseph R. Biden Jr., Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Senator Amy Klobuchar are on the other, castigating Medicare for all as a “pipe dream,” as the Minnesotan called it.The health care discussion showed the greater schism in the Democratic Party. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are on the side of eliminating private health insurance and installing a Medicare for all system, while Joseph R. Biden Jr., Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Senator Amy Klobuchar are on the other, castigating Medicare for all as a “pipe dream,” as the Minnesotan called it.
It is the broader debate rippling throughout the 2020 Democratic campaign trail. Polls show the party’s voters tend to favor the Warren-Sanders proposals, but are nagged by whether a candidate running on eliminating private health insurance can win a general election. This is the crux of the Democratic debate: a pull between early-state voters’ hearts and heads, with each of them becoming prognosticators guessing about what swing voters in key swing states might prefer.It is the broader debate rippling throughout the 2020 Democratic campaign trail. Polls show the party’s voters tend to favor the Warren-Sanders proposals, but are nagged by whether a candidate running on eliminating private health insurance can win a general election. This is the crux of the Democratic debate: a pull between early-state voters’ hearts and heads, with each of them becoming prognosticators guessing about what swing voters in key swing states might prefer.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, as she has done for weeks on the campaign trail, refused to entertain the question of whether “Medicare for all” will require a middle-class tax increase.Senator Elizabeth Warren, as she has done for weeks on the campaign trail, refused to entertain the question of whether “Medicare for all” will require a middle-class tax increase.
Instead she aimed to turn the question to overall costs.Instead she aimed to turn the question to overall costs.
“Let me be clear on this,” she said. “I will not sign a bill into law that does not lower costs for middle class families.”“Let me be clear on this,” she said. “I will not sign a bill into law that does not lower costs for middle class families.”
She repeatedly refused to say.She repeatedly refused to say.
Mayor Pete Buttigieg immediately pounced.Mayor Pete Buttigieg immediately pounced.
“A yes or no question that did not get a yes or no answer,” he said, saying it sounded like the type of things Americans hate about Washington. He added, “Your signature senator is to have a plan for everything: Except this.”“A yes or no question that did not get a yes or no answer,” he said, saying it sounded like the type of things Americans hate about Washington. He added, “Your signature senator is to have a plan for everything: Except this.”
Mr. Buttigieg then pitched his “Medicare for all who want it.” When Ms. Warren’s turn came, she said that Mr. Buttigieg’s vision amounts to “Medicare for all who can afford it.”Mr. Buttigieg then pitched his “Medicare for all who want it.” When Ms. Warren’s turn came, she said that Mr. Buttigieg’s vision amounts to “Medicare for all who can afford it.”
Mr. Buttigieg came back and said Ms. Warren would “obliterate” the private health insurance of 150 million Americans. “It’s just better than Medicare for all whether you want it or not,” Mr. Buttigieg said, rebranding Ms. Warren’s plan in a more negative light.Mr. Buttigieg came back and said Ms. Warren would “obliterate” the private health insurance of 150 million Americans. “It’s just better than Medicare for all whether you want it or not,” Mr. Buttigieg said, rebranding Ms. Warren’s plan in a more negative light.
Senator Amy Klobuchar followed up with her own hit on Ms. Warren.Senator Amy Klobuchar followed up with her own hit on Ms. Warren.
“At least Bernie’s being honest here,” Ms. Klobuchar interrupted, addressing Ms. Warren as “Elizabeth,” saying Americans deserved to know where the “invoice” was going.“At least Bernie’s being honest here,” Ms. Klobuchar interrupted, addressing Ms. Warren as “Elizabeth,” saying Americans deserved to know where the “invoice” was going.
Ms. Klobuchar continued, dismissing Ms. Warren’s ideas as unrealistic, declaring there is a “difference between a plan and pipe dream.”Ms. Klobuchar continued, dismissing Ms. Warren’s ideas as unrealistic, declaring there is a “difference between a plan and pipe dream.”
It fell to Mr. Sanders to explain exactly what Medicare for all would require.It fell to Mr. Sanders to explain exactly what Medicare for all would require.
“Taxes will go up,” he said, before explaining that costs will go down because, under his plan, medical insurance premiums and co-pays would be eliminated.“Taxes will go up,” he said, before explaining that costs will go down because, under his plan, medical insurance premiums and co-pays would be eliminated.
Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. largely dodged a question about whether it was proper for his son, Hunter, to work for a Ukrainian energy company, aiming to turn the question back onto President Trump’s conduct.Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. largely dodged a question about whether it was proper for his son, Hunter, to work for a Ukrainian energy company, aiming to turn the question back onto President Trump’s conduct.
“My son did nothing wrong. I did nothing wrong. I carried out the policy of the United States government in rooting out corruption in Ukraine,” Mr. Biden said.“My son did nothing wrong. I did nothing wrong. I carried out the policy of the United States government in rooting out corruption in Ukraine,” Mr. Biden said.
Invoking George Washington’s warning about foreign interference in American affairs, Mr. Biden said Mr. Trump has directed his aides to investigate Mr. Biden and his son because he doesn’t want him as a general election opponent.Invoking George Washington’s warning about foreign interference in American affairs, Mr. Biden said Mr. Trump has directed his aides to investigate Mr. Biden and his son because he doesn’t want him as a general election opponent.
“Rudy Giuliani, the president and his thugs have already proven they are flat lying,” Mr. Biden said. “He doesn’t want me to be the candidate.”“Rudy Giuliani, the president and his thugs have already proven they are flat lying,” Mr. Biden said. “He doesn’t want me to be the candidate.”
Pressed again on the question, Mr. Biden said: “My son’s statement speaks for itself. I did my job. I never discussed a single thing with my son about anything having to do with Ukraine. No one has indicated I have.”Pressed again on the question, Mr. Biden said: “My son’s statement speaks for itself. I did my job. I never discussed a single thing with my son about anything having to do with Ukraine. No one has indicated I have.”
Senator Bernie Sanders followed Mr. Biden but notably choose not to defend Mr. Biden or his son’s work in Ukraine, pivoting to his own message about fighting for the middle class.Senator Bernie Sanders followed Mr. Biden but notably choose not to defend Mr. Biden or his son’s work in Ukraine, pivoting to his own message about fighting for the middle class.
CNN’s Anderson Cooper directed the first question to Senator Elizabeth Warren, who has surged in the polls in recent months, about impeachment, asking her why Mr. Trump should be impeached and removed from office with only a year until the election.CNN’s Anderson Cooper directed the first question to Senator Elizabeth Warren, who has surged in the polls in recent months, about impeachment, asking her why Mr. Trump should be impeached and removed from office with only a year until the election.
“Sometimes there are issues that are bigger than politics,” she began. “No one is above the law.”“Sometimes there are issues that are bigger than politics,” she began. “No one is above the law.”
“This is about Donald Trump but understand this is about the next president and the next president and the next president,” she said. “The impeachment must go forward.”“This is about Donald Trump but understand this is about the next president and the next president and the next president,” she said. “The impeachment must go forward.”
Mr. Sanders added that Mr. Trump the “most corrupt” president in American history.Mr. Sanders added that Mr. Trump the “most corrupt” president in American history.
Mr. Biden agreed that Mr. Trump was the “most corrupt,” and hit Mr. Trump for failing to cooperate. “They have no choice but to move,” Mr. Biden said of Congress.Mr. Biden agreed that Mr. Trump was the “most corrupt,” and hit Mr. Trump for failing to cooperate. “They have no choice but to move,” Mr. Biden said of Congress.
“He’s been selling out our democracy,” Senator Kamala Harris said when her turn came around, adding “He has given us the evidence and tried to cover it up.”“He’s been selling out our democracy,” Senator Kamala Harris said when her turn came around, adding “He has given us the evidence and tried to cover it up.”
By opening the debate with impeachment questions, the moderators are throwing softballs to the candidates onstage. So far they’ve allowed Ms. Warren, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Biden and Ms. Harris to recite their stump speech remarks on impeachment without any contrast with each other.By opening the debate with impeachment questions, the moderators are throwing softballs to the candidates onstage. So far they’ve allowed Ms. Warren, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Biden and Ms. Harris to recite their stump speech remarks on impeachment without any contrast with each other.
“Our framers imagined this moment,” Ms. Harris said. “A moment when we would have a corrupt president.”“Our framers imagined this moment,” Ms. Harris said. “A moment when we would have a corrupt president.”
It’s a far cry from the first three debates, which each opened with taut exchanges about health care policy. Allowing them each a direct contrast with Mr. Trump falls square in the wheelhouse of each of the Democrats running to replace him.It’s a far cry from the first three debates, which each opened with taut exchanges about health care policy. Allowing them each a direct contrast with Mr. Trump falls square in the wheelhouse of each of the Democrats running to replace him.
The challenge for the candidates who have to go later in what are effectively opening statements on impeachment is saying something that viewers didn’t just already hear.The challenge for the candidates who have to go later in what are effectively opening statements on impeachment is saying something that viewers didn’t just already hear.
Asked about the possibility of impeachment distracting her party and Congress, Ms. Klobuchar said, “We can do two things at once.” She added a quick reference to farmers in Iowa, where she is staking her campaign.Asked about the possibility of impeachment distracting her party and Congress, Ms. Klobuchar said, “We can do two things at once.” She added a quick reference to farmers in Iowa, where she is staking her campaign.
“I’d like to hear from him about how coddling up to Vladimir Putin makes America great again,” Ms. Klobuchar said.“I’d like to hear from him about how coddling up to Vladimir Putin makes America great again,” Ms. Klobuchar said.
Mayor Pete Buttigieg went after Republicans for opposing impeachment.Mayor Pete Buttigieg went after Republicans for opposing impeachment.
“A president 10 years or 100 years from now will look back at this moment and either draw the conclusion that no one is above the law or that a president can get away with anything,” he said, echoing a line that Ms. Warren said a few minutes earlier.“A president 10 years or 100 years from now will look back at this moment and either draw the conclusion that no one is above the law or that a president can get away with anything,” he said, echoing a line that Ms. Warren said a few minutes earlier.
Mr. Buttigieg, as he has in past debates, invoked the morals of not just Mr. Trump but congressional Republicans, who he said should also be supporting impeachment.Mr. Buttigieg, as he has in past debates, invoked the morals of not just Mr. Trump but congressional Republicans, who he said should also be supporting impeachment.
Representative Tulsi Gabbard, the lone House member onstage, struck a different tone, expressing concern about the division an impeachment would cause and echoed a talking point that Mr. Trump’s allies have used: that Democrats have wanted to impeach Mr. Trump from the start.Representative Tulsi Gabbard, the lone House member onstage, struck a different tone, expressing concern about the division an impeachment would cause and echoed a talking point that Mr. Trump’s allies have used: that Democrats have wanted to impeach Mr. Trump from the start.
“He won that election in 2016,” Ms. Gabbard said.“He won that election in 2016,” Ms. Gabbard said.
The 12 Democratic candidates are now taking the stage, shaking hands and smiling and waving to the audience. Mr. Biden was first, followed by Ms. Warren, who shook his hand and said, “Hi Joe.” Mr. Sanders was next, waving to the hall and shaking the hands of his two top rivals. Ms. Harris took the stage and gave Mr. Sanders a gentle pat on the back. When former Representative Beto O’Rourke entered he shook the hands of everyone onstage. Seven other candidates filed in, waving to the audience one after another.The 12 Democratic candidates are now taking the stage, shaking hands and smiling and waving to the audience. Mr. Biden was first, followed by Ms. Warren, who shook his hand and said, “Hi Joe.” Mr. Sanders was next, waving to the hall and shaking the hands of his two top rivals. Ms. Harris took the stage and gave Mr. Sanders a gentle pat on the back. When former Representative Beto O’Rourke entered he shook the hands of everyone onstage. Seven other candidates filed in, waving to the audience one after another.
Even more than in past debates, there are a lot of eyes on Mr. Sanders, who had a heart attack exactly two weeks ago, and who is returning to the campaign trail with tonight’s debate. Many Democrats are also watching Mr. Biden closely to see how he handles any questions about his son Hunter Biden’s work for overseas companies.Even more than in past debates, there are a lot of eyes on Mr. Sanders, who had a heart attack exactly two weeks ago, and who is returning to the campaign trail with tonight’s debate. Many Democrats are also watching Mr. Biden closely to see how he handles any questions about his son Hunter Biden’s work for overseas companies.
Each of the 12 candidates onstage tonight will be looking for standout moments. But if history is a guide, avoiding the wrong kind of standout moment may be even more important. However superficial it may be, a gaffe at a debate can destroy a campaign, as New York Times political reporters explored in a video today. Just look at Rick Perry’s “oops” moment in 2011, when he forgot the name of the third government agency he promised to eliminate as president, or Gerald Ford misspeaking in 1976 and saying Russia did not have influence in Eastern Europe. That moment was especially devastating for Ford because it played directly into an image many voters already had of him.
Occasionally, candidates can give themselves a boost or take out an opponent in one fell swoop. But more often, even the most well-placed attack will hurt the target more than it helps the attacker. Take Chris Christie, who went after Marco Rubio in 2016 for using canned lines. Mr. Rubio was badly wounded, but the Christie campaign went nowhere. It’s one more piece of evidence that when the points are tallied at the end of the night, voters may be swayed more by who lost than who won.
Much of the discussion here in Ohio Tuesday has been about the interview that ABC broadcast this morning of Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s son, Hunter Biden. The younger Biden acknowledged “poor judgment” in working for a Ukrainian energy company while his father was vice president, but said he had done nothing wrong.
The interview drew predictable wrath from Republicans aligned with President Trump — many of whom are the children of powerful officials even though they denigrated the Bidens with charges of nepotism. But so far Mr. Biden’s fellow Democrats have steered clear of the issue.
When the topic comes up during tonight’s debate, expect Mr. Biden’s onstage rivals to jump to his defense. Mr. Buttigieg did so Sunday, saying Hunter Biden was being held to “different standards” than the Trump children, who are engaged in their own international business dealings. Mr. Biden responded by calling Mr. Buttigieg “a good man.”
There will likely be more of that sentiment tonight. Democratic voters have shown little tolerance for their candidates echoing Mr. Trump’s attacks — nobody running has questioned Ms. Warren’s claims of Native American heritage. So when the inevitable moderator question about Mr. Biden’s son happens tonight, it may serve as a kumbaya moment.
Dozens of Ohio’s Democratic leaders have gathered in and around the state capital in advance of the debate, and they are thinking well past tonight: Can the party’s eventual presidential nominee carry the state next year?
This is a state that has long prized its status as one of the premier presidential battlegrounds: Every winning candidate since 1960, has carried Ohio. But the truth is, Ohio has long been slightly more conservative than what approximates the national median. And as the two parties increasingly realign along educational lines, this heavily working-class state has become even more red.
For evidence, look no further than President Trump’s eight-point victory over Hillary Clinton in Ohio in 2016 — a margin that was higher than in some states where Mrs. Clinton did not stump in the final weekend of the election, as she did in Ohio. Publicly, of course, Ohio’s leading Democrats insist that they can put the state back in their column in 2020. Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, who considered seeking the nomination, emailed a memo to the media this week extolling the state’s “crucial role on the national stage,” reciting the state’s history as a bellwether with the not-so-subtle header: “As Goes Ohio.”
Yet in private conversations, Ohio Democrats are less confident about their prospects next year. They acknowledge other states will be more competitive and important to their nominee. However, these same Democrats are quick to add that they may reclaim the state if — and it’s a big if — they have the right nominee.
It is, in other words, the same debate Democrats are having nationally. Except here, in a state that has produced seven presidents and claims paternity over electing even more, it’s personal.
While there are a handful of candidates for whom October is likely their last appearance at a national debate, given the Democratic National Committee’s higher polling requirements in November and beyond, one man will be making his national debut: Tom Steyer.
Mr. Steyer, the billionaire businessman who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, is nonetheless a familiar face to millions of Americans because of his self-funded advertising campaigns: first his blitz calling for the impeachment of Mr. Trump and, more recently, his aggressive campaigning in the early-voting states, where he is by far the largest television advertiser.
Mr. Steyer could surprise some viewers. While he comes from the wealthy class that Mr. Sanders and Ms. Warren have staked their campaigns railing against, Mr. Steyer actually aligns with those two leading liberals on many issues, including support for a “wealth tax” on the assets of the superrich. He is running as an outsider and is passionate in particular about climate change, a space less filled since Gov. Jay Inslee dropped out of the race.
One particular thing to watch for: Mr. Steyer has a favorite red plaid tie that has made even his friends and allies groan about occasionally. The Christmas-like color scheme could make a distinct first impression in October.
Maggie Astor, Thomas Kaplan, Jonathan Martin, Sydney Ember, Katie Glueck and Kevin McKenna contributed reporting.Maggie Astor, Thomas Kaplan, Jonathan Martin, Sydney Ember, Katie Glueck and Kevin McKenna contributed reporting.