This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/14/books/booker-prize-winner-atwood-evaristo.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Margaret Atwood and Bernardine Evaristo Share Booker Prize Margaret Atwood and Bernardine Evaristo Share Booker Prize
(about 1 hour later)
LONDON — Margaret Atwood and Bernardine Evaristo have both won this year’s Booker Prize, it was announced at a ceremony on Monday, after the judges for the literary award rebelled against its rules.LONDON — Margaret Atwood and Bernardine Evaristo have both won this year’s Booker Prize, it was announced at a ceremony on Monday, after the judges for the literary award rebelled against its rules.
“We were told quite firmly that the rules state you can only have one winner,” Peter Florence, the chairman of the Booker judges, said at a news conference. But the “consensus was to flout the rules and divide this year’s prize to celebrate two winners.”“We were told quite firmly that the rules state you can only have one winner,” Peter Florence, the chairman of the Booker judges, said at a news conference. But the “consensus was to flout the rules and divide this year’s prize to celebrate two winners.”
Evaristo, who won for her novel “Girl, Woman, Other,” is the first black woman to win the Booker Prize. Atwood, who won in 2000 for “The Blind Assassin,” was considered a front-runner this year for “The Testaments,” the sequel to her 1985 dystopian classic, “The Handmaid’s Tale.” Evaristo, who won for her novel “Girl, Woman, Other,” is the first black woman to win the Booker Prize. “I hope that honor doesn’t last too long,” she said in her acceptance speech. Atwood, who won in 2000 for “The Blind Assassin,” was considered a front-runner this year for “The Testaments,” the sequel to her 1985 dystopian classic, “The Handmaid’s Tale.”
It is not the first time the award has been shared. In 1992, Michael Ondaatje’s “The English Patient” shared it with Barry Unsworth’s “Sacred Hunger,” but the prize’s organizers then changed the rules to only allow one winner to avoid undermining either book.It is not the first time the award has been shared. In 1992, Michael Ondaatje’s “The English Patient” shared it with Barry Unsworth’s “Sacred Hunger,” but the prize’s organizers then changed the rules to only allow one winner to avoid undermining either book.
Several judging panels had tried to split the prize since, said Gaby Wood, the Booker Prize Foundation’s literary director, but settled on single winners after being told they had to.Several judging panels had tried to split the prize since, said Gaby Wood, the Booker Prize Foundation’s literary director, but settled on single winners after being told they had to.
The decision to rebel and award the prize to two writers this year was not taken lightly. The judges, who included the author Xiaolu Guo and editor Liz Calder, spent over three hours trying to pick a winner before asking if they could choose both. They were told they couldn’t. The judges then — to the Booker organizers’ “horror,” Florence said — spent another “hour-and-a-half agonizing how to resolve the issue,” before deciding it was the only result they wanted.The decision to rebel and award the prize to two writers this year was not taken lightly. The judges, who included the author Xiaolu Guo and editor Liz Calder, spent over three hours trying to pick a winner before asking if they could choose both. They were told they couldn’t. The judges then — to the Booker organizers’ “horror,” Florence said — spent another “hour-and-a-half agonizing how to resolve the issue,” before deciding it was the only result they wanted.
They were again told it was unacceptable. It was only at a third attempt, 30 minutes later, that the Booker Prize’s trustees accepted the decision.They were again told it was unacceptable. It was only at a third attempt, 30 minutes later, that the Booker Prize’s trustees accepted the decision.
Wood dodged the question when asked if she supported the final result. “I support the mechanism by which the judges made their decision,” she said. She then joked the judges would not be paid for their involvement, which included reading 151 submitted books.Wood dodged the question when asked if she supported the final result. “I support the mechanism by which the judges made their decision,” she said. She then joked the judges would not be paid for their involvement, which included reading 151 submitted books.
For Atwood, the prize comes at a moment of renewed cultural relevance for “The Handmaid’s Tale,” which has sold more than 8 million copies worldwide in English. The novel was adapted into a hit television series on Hulu, and the story has taken on fresh political resonance, as women dressed as handmaids have flooded Congress and state capitols to protest new restrictions on reproductive rights. In “The Testaments,” Atwood weaves together the stories of three female narrators in Gilead, a religious autocracy in what was formerly the United States.For Atwood, the prize comes at a moment of renewed cultural relevance for “The Handmaid’s Tale,” which has sold more than 8 million copies worldwide in English. The novel was adapted into a hit television series on Hulu, and the story has taken on fresh political resonance, as women dressed as handmaids have flooded Congress and state capitols to protest new restrictions on reproductive rights. In “The Testaments,” Atwood weaves together the stories of three female narrators in Gilead, a religious autocracy in what was formerly the United States.
Evaristo, an experimental writer who is well established in Britain but not widely known internationally, is a more surprising choice. In her eight works of fiction, Evaristo, who was born in London in 1959 to a white English mother and a Nigerian father, often explores the lives of members of the African diaspora. “Girl, Woman, Other” features a dozen characters, most of them black British women. It’s written in a blend of poetry and prose, a hybrid that Evaristo calls “fusion fiction.”Evaristo, an experimental writer who is well established in Britain but not widely known internationally, is a more surprising choice. In her eight works of fiction, Evaristo, who was born in London in 1959 to a white English mother and a Nigerian father, often explores the lives of members of the African diaspora. “Girl, Woman, Other” features a dozen characters, most of them black British women. It’s written in a blend of poetry and prose, a hybrid that Evaristo calls “fusion fiction.”
In an interview with The Guardian earlier this year, Evaristo said she wrote “Girl, Woman, Other” in part because she wanted to focus on the experience of black British women, who are rarely featured prominently in contemporary literature. “I wanted to put presence into absence,” she said.In an interview with The Guardian earlier this year, Evaristo said she wrote “Girl, Woman, Other” in part because she wanted to focus on the experience of black British women, who are rarely featured prominently in contemporary literature. “I wanted to put presence into absence,” she said.
The other novels on the shortlist included Lucy Ellmann’s “Ducks, Newburyport,” a 1,000 page novel about a middle-aged woman in Ohio reflecting on her life while baking, which unfolds almost entirely in a single sentence; Chigozie Obioma’s “An Orchestra of Minorities,” about a Nigerian poultry farmer called Chinonso who stops a woman from jumping to her death and falls in love with her; Salman Rushdie’s “Quichotte,” a retelling of “Don Quixote” that features a traveling salesman on a quest to win over a beautiful television host; and Elif Shafak’s “10 Minutes 38 Seconds in This Strange World,” a story about a sex worker in Istanbul who is murdered and left in the garbage on the outskirts of the city.The other novels on the shortlist included Lucy Ellmann’s “Ducks, Newburyport,” a 1,000 page novel about a middle-aged woman in Ohio reflecting on her life while baking, which unfolds almost entirely in a single sentence; Chigozie Obioma’s “An Orchestra of Minorities,” about a Nigerian poultry farmer called Chinonso who stops a woman from jumping to her death and falls in love with her; Salman Rushdie’s “Quichotte,” a retelling of “Don Quixote” that features a traveling salesman on a quest to win over a beautiful television host; and Elif Shafak’s “10 Minutes 38 Seconds in This Strange World,” a story about a sex worker in Istanbul who is murdered and left in the garbage on the outskirts of the city.
Compared to previous years, in which Americans were heavily represented, writers from the United States were scarce this year. The sole American on the shortlist is Ellmann, a native of Illinois who now lives in Scotland.Compared to previous years, in which Americans were heavily represented, writers from the United States were scarce this year. The sole American on the shortlist is Ellmann, a native of Illinois who now lives in Scotland.
Evaristo and Atwood will split the prize money of 50,000 pounds, around $63,000, although the Booker, first awarded in 1969, normally delivers a sales boost. Anna Burns’s “Milkman,” an experimental novel about a woman during Northern Ireland’s civil conflict, has sold over 500,000 copies since winning the prize last year.Evaristo and Atwood will split the prize money of 50,000 pounds, around $63,000, although the Booker, first awarded in 1969, normally delivers a sales boost. Anna Burns’s “Milkman,” an experimental novel about a woman during Northern Ireland’s civil conflict, has sold over 500,000 copies since winning the prize last year.
The Booker is one of the literary world’s most prestigious prizes. Past winners include Rushdie, who was shortlisted for this year’s prize, as well as such literary heavyweights as Hilary Mantel and J.M. Coetzee. Atwood now joins Mantel, Coetzee and Peter Carey in the small club of authors to have won twice.The Booker is one of the literary world’s most prestigious prizes. Past winners include Rushdie, who was shortlisted for this year’s prize, as well as such literary heavyweights as Hilary Mantel and J.M. Coetzee. Atwood now joins Mantel, Coetzee and Peter Carey in the small club of authors to have won twice.
Follow New York Times Books on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, sign up for our newsletter or our literary calendar. And listen to us on the Book Review podcast.