This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/11/seville-judge-throws-out-rebellious-pussy-latex-vagina-effigy-case

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Seville judge throws out 'rebellious pussy' vagina effigy case Seville judge throws out 'rebellious pussy' effigy case
(32 minutes later)
A judge in Seville has thrown out charges of “crimes against religious sentiment” against three women who carried a two-metre high latex effigy of a vagina in a May day parade. A judge in Seville has thrown out charges of “crimes against religious sentiment” against three women who carried a two-metre latex effigy of a vagina in a May Day parade.
The case dates back to 2014 when the accused carried the offending statue they dubbed the coño insumiso (“rebellious pussy”) in a parade organised by the general workers union in an apparent parody of the effigies of saints and the Virgin Mary carried on religious parades. The case dates back to 2014 when the accused carried the offending statue, which they called the coño insumiso (rebellious pussy), in a parade organised by the general workers’ union, in an apparent parody of the effigies of saints and the Virgin Mary carried on religious parades.
The women said the were marching on behalf of the Guild of the Sacred Rebellious Pussy and the Sacred Burial of Social and Workers’ Rights. The women said they were marching on behalf of the Guild of the Sacred Rebellious Pussy and the Sacred Burial of Social and Workers’ Rights.
The three women, Rocío Ballesta, Antonia Ávalos and a third who preferred to remain anonymous, claim they were singled out of a group of 200 who took part in the march. The three women – Rocío Ballesta, Antonia Ávalos and a third who preferred to remain anonymous – claimed they were singled out of a group of 200 who took part in the march.
“We feel that we are being persecuted and criminalised for defending women’s sexual and reproductive rights,” said Ávalos.“We feel that we are being persecuted and criminalised for defending women’s sexual and reproductive rights,” said Ávalos.
The three denied wishing to cause offence and say they simply wanted to draw attention to their belief that the church’s teaching denies women fundamental rights at a time when the government was planning to introduce a restrictive abortion law. The three denied wishing to cause offence and said they simply wanted to draw attention to their belief that the church’s teaching denied women fundamental rights at a time when the government was planning to introduce a restrictive abortion law.
The case was dropped in 2016 as the court found that “publicly proclaiming that you don’t follow a religious faith” represented freedom of expression. It was reopened a year later when the Association of Christian Lawyers brought a civil action for “crimes against religious sentiment” and “mocking Catholic symbols and dogma”.The case was dropped in 2016 as the court found that “publicly proclaiming that you don’t follow a religious faith” represented freedom of expression. It was reopened a year later when the Association of Christian Lawyers brought a civil action for “crimes against religious sentiment” and “mocking Catholic symbols and dogma”.
The lawyers association also claimed the women wore hoods, in the manner of penitents, and chanted “the Virgin would also have had an abortion” as well as parodies of the Credo, the Christian liturgy, and “the immutable truths behind the Catholic faith”. The lawyers’ association also claimed the women wore hoods in the manner of penitents and chanted “the Virgin would also have had an abortion”, as well as parodies of the Credo, the Christian liturgy, and “the immutable truths behind the Catholic faith”.
In his ruling, the judge said that the point of the procession was not to offend religious sensibilities but to “defend social, workers and feminist rights”. In his ruling, the judge said the point of the procession was not to offend religious sensibilities but to “defend social, workers’ and feminist rights.”
Maria Alyokhina, a founding member of the Russian feminist group Pussy Riot, joined the Andalusian Human Rights Association and other groups protesting outside the court against what they denounced as “an affront to freedom of speech” and the “criminalisation of social movements”. Maria Alyokhina, a founding member of the Russian feminist group Pussy Riot, joined the Andalusian Human Rights Association and other groups protesting outside the court against the attempted prosecution, which they denounced as “an affront to freedom of speech” and the “criminalisation of social movements”.
“The case is totally unjust and bears many similarities to the repression in Russia,” Alyokhina said, adding that, “after all, we all come out of a vagina”. “The case is totally unjust and bears many similarities to the repression in Russia,” Alyokhina said, adding: “After all, we all come out of a vagina.”
In 2012 Alyokhina, better known as Masha, was condemned to two years in Siberia after Pussy Riot staged a performance in Moscow cathedral critical of president Vladimir Putin. In 2012 Alyokhina, better known as Masha, was condemned to two years in Siberia after Pussy Riot staged a performance at a Moscow cathedral that was critical of Vladimir Putin.
SpainSpain
Feminism
EuropeEurope
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content