This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-50011218

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Iran oil tanker 'explosion' reported off Saudi coast Iran oil tanker 'explosion' reported off Saudi coast
(32 minutes later)
An explosion has caused a fire on an Iranian tanker near the coast of Saudi Arabia, Iranian media say.An explosion has caused a fire on an Iranian tanker near the coast of Saudi Arabia, Iranian media say.
The vessel, from Iran's national oil company (NIOC), was 60 miles (97km) from the Saudi port of Jeddah.The vessel, from Iran's national oil company (NIOC), was 60 miles (97km) from the Saudi port of Jeddah.
The ship's two main storage tanks are said to have been damaged, causing an oil spill in the Red Sea, but no-one was reportedly injured.The ship's two main storage tanks are said to have been damaged, causing an oil spill in the Red Sea, but no-one was reportedly injured.
Iran's foreign ministry claimed the vessel was "targeted twice" but did not provide further details. Iran's foreign ministry claimed the vessel had been "targeted twice" but did not provide further details.
On Friday morning, an official with Iran's national tanker company (NITC) said the vessel was struck by missiles "probably" from Saudi Arabia. On Friday morning, an unnamed source told Iran media the vessel was struck by missiles "probably" originating from Saudi Arabia.
That statement was retracted, according to the country's state-run IRNA news agency. But the NIOC later denied the claim. It said two separate explosions took place aboard the ship that were "probably" caused by missiles.
The explosion is yet to be independently verified, and details of the tanker itself are unclear. Iranian state TV earlier identified it as the Sinopa, but the NIOC later said it was another vessel named Sabiti.The explosion is yet to be independently verified, and details of the tanker itself are unclear. Iranian state TV earlier identified it as the Sinopa, but the NIOC later said it was another vessel named Sabiti.
Publicly-available ship tracking records show both ships are currently in the Red Sea. The Sinopa turned its transmitter on earlier this week after more than 50 days. The Sabiti switched its tracker on Friday morning for the first time in nearly 60 days. Pictures allegedly taken on Friday aboard the Sabiti have been published by Iranian state TV, showing no visible signs of damage.
A source at maritime analytics firm Windward told the BBC it was common for such ships to turn off their automatic identification system (AIS) trackers to avoid detection - often to evade international sanctions or harassment from Saudi Arabia. Publicly-available ship tracking records show both ships are currently in the Red Sea. The Sinopa turned its transmitter on earlier this week for the first time in more than 50 days. The Sabiti, meanwhile, turned its tracker on early Friday after nearly 60 days of no transmissions.
Because of regulations, such vessels must turn their AIS back on close the Suez Canal. The Windward source said Sabiti was behaving unusually because it switched its AIS back on hundreds of miles from the Suez, after being "dark" for two months. Under international regulations, all vessels above a certain tonnage must be fitted with the trackers, known as automatic identification systems (AIS). But ships are not required to have their AIS turned on all the time.
The incident came amid heightened tension between Iran and Saudi Arabia. A source at maritime analytics firm Windward told the BBC it was common for Iranian tankers to turn off AIS to avoid detection - often to evade international sanctions or harassment from Saudi Arabia.
Because of safety regulations, vessels must have their AIS switched on when they are close to the Suez Canal. The Windward source said Sabiti was behaving unusually because, when going through the canal, it only switches on its AIS when rules require - but in this instance, the AIS had been turned on hundreds of miles from the Suez after being "dark" for two months.
Michelle Bockmann, an analyst at shipping newspaper Lloyds List, told the BBC that the tanker - whichever one it was - was "probably" carrying oil to Syria.
"That really is, along with China, the only market there is for Iranian crude now since the US tightened sanctions in May," said Ms Bockmann. "We're seeing geopolitics playing out within the global shipping and tanker markets, and this is just an extension of the instability that we're seeing in the region."
The latest incident came amid heightened tension between Iran and Saudi Arabia in recent months.
Last month, 18 drones and seven cruise missiles hit a major oil field and processing facility in Saudi Arabia, which blamed Iran for the attack.Last month, 18 drones and seven cruise missiles hit a major oil field and processing facility in Saudi Arabia, which blamed Iran for the attack.
And US officials said Iran was responsible for attacks on two oil tankers in the Gulf in June and July, as well as attacks on another four tankers in May.And US officials said Iran was responsible for attacks on two oil tankers in the Gulf in June and July, as well as attacks on another four tankers in May.
Iran denied involvement in all the incidents.Iran denied involvement in all the incidents.