This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/oct/11/federal-court-rules-union-regulator-did-not-have-reasonable-grounds-to-raid-awu

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Court rules union regulator did not have 'reasonable grounds' to raid AWU Court rules union regulator did not have 'reasonable grounds' to raid AWU
(32 minutes later)
The Australian Workers’ Union has successfully challenged the union regulator’s decision to have police raid its offices in Melbourne and Sydney but fell short in its attempt to show the investigation was motivated by an improper purpose.The Australian Workers’ Union has successfully challenged the union regulator’s decision to have police raid its offices in Melbourne and Sydney but fell short in its attempt to show the investigation was motivated by an improper purpose.
On Friday the federal court justice Mordecai Bromberg rejected the AWU’s position that raids on their offices in October 2017 by the Registered Organisations Commission (ROC) were made to “embarrass or politically harm” then-opposition leader Bill Shorten. On Friday the federal court justice Mordecai Bromberg rejected the AWU’s position that raids on its offices in October 2017 by the Registered Organisations Commission were made to “embarrass or politically harm” the then-opposition leader, Bill Shorten.
But the AWU succeeded in showing the “suspicion” that the union had breached its rules was not a reasonable grounds to conduct the raid, meaning the case will now move to consider whether the raids were invalid and evidence collected should be returned to the union. But the union succeeded in showing the “suspicion” that it had breached Roc’s rules was not a reasonable ground to conduct the raid, meaning the case will now move to consider whether the warrants were invalid and evidence collected should be returned to the union.
Although the judge found no wrongdoing by then-employment minister Michaelia Cash, the judgment is politically embarrassing to the government since it concludes Cash’s advisor David De Garis and Michael Tetlow in then-justice minister Michael Keenan’s office tipped media off about the raid. Although the judge found no wrongdoing by the then-employment minister, Michaelia Cash, the judgment is politically embarrassing to the government since it concludes Cash’s adviser David De Garis and Michael Tetlow in the then-justice minister Michael Keenan’s office tipped media off about the raid.
Ensuring integrity bill: officials contradict Christian Porter on union deregistrationEnsuring integrity bill: officials contradict Christian Porter on union deregistration
In October 2017 police raided the AWU headquarters investigating whether donations made to GetUp and Labor candidates in 2005 were authorised under the union’s rules.In October 2017 police raided the AWU headquarters investigating whether donations made to GetUp and Labor candidates in 2005 were authorised under the union’s rules.
On Friday justice Bromberg rejected the AWU’s claim the regulator had no power to investigate alleged historical breaches. On Friday Bromberg rejected the AWU’s claim the regulator had no power to investigate alleged historical breaches.
The judge found that the ROC’s delegate Chris Enright believed if the union had made the political donations then those acts were in breach of its rules, the “reasonable grounds” on which he relied to order the raids. He found that the Roc’s delegate, Chris Enright, believed if the union had made the political donations then those acts were in breach of its rules, the “reasonable grounds” on which he relied to order the raids.
But the judge said there was “no basis” for this opinion, citing a section of industrial law that after four years officers’ conduct must be “taken to have been done in compliance with the rules” of the union. But Bromberg said there was “no basis” for this opinion, citing a section of industrial law that after four years officers’ conduct must be “taken to have been done in compliance with the rules” of the union.
Justice Bromberg rejected the AWU’s claims the investigation was initiated for an improper purpose, concluding the evidence “does not establish” Enright had taken Cash’s political interests into account. Bromberg rejected the AWU’s claims the investigation was initiated for an improper purpose, concluding the evidence “does not establish” Enright had taken Cash’s political interests into account.
In October 2017 Cash repeatedly denied her office’s involvement in leaking the impending raids to the media but then-senior media adviser, David De Garis, resigned after Buzzfeed revealed he had tipped them off. The AFP then set up an investigation into the leak. He noted Enright’s evidence that he had assumed Cash had a “political purpose” when she referred the matter to the Roc for investigation and that purpose was to harm Shorten .
In July 2018 the police referred the media tipoff to prosecutors to consider whether there was sufficient evidence to lay charges, but the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions later concluded there were “no reasonable prospects of a conviction” for the unauthorised leak. But Bromberg said this was Enright’s “own understanding” and he had “no basis” to find Enright had knowledge of Cash’s actual purpose. The judge declined to make any finding on the credibility of Cash’s denial that harming Shorten was her purpose.
Maurice Blackburn principal Josh Bornstein, acting for the AWU, said the judgment made clear “the Roc had no proper legal basis to conduct an investigation into the AWU’s compliance with its rules some 10 years earlier”.
Labor and the Australian Council of Trade Unions also seized on the result, warning that the Coalition’s ensuring integrity bill would give even more power to the Roc to seek deregistration of unions and disqualification of their officials.
The opposition spokesman on industrial relations, Tony Burke, argued the public “simply cannot have any faith in [the Roc’s] competence or its impartiality”.
The ACTU secretary, Sally McManus, said the result showed the raid “wasn’t justified and was used as a political weapon by staff in two ministerial offices”.
In October 2017 Cash repeatedly denied her office’s involvement in leaking the impending raids to the media but De Garis resigned after Buzzfeed revealed he had tipped them off. The AFP then set up an investigation into the leak.
In July 2018 the police referred the media tipoff to prosecutors to consider whether there was sufficient evidence to lay charges, but the commonwealth director of public prosecutions later concluded there were “no reasonable prospects of a conviction” for the unauthorised leak.
Australian trade unionsAustralian trade unions
Bill ShortenBill Shorten
Australian politicsAustralian politics
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content