This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/education/7788718.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Many UK researchers 'world class' Many UK researchers 'world class'
(about 5 hours later)
A huge review of UK academic research has found that 54% of the work assessed in 159 universities was "world leading" or "internationally excellent".A huge review of UK academic research has found that 54% of the work assessed in 159 universities was "world leading" or "internationally excellent".
The 67 expert Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) panels said that another 33% was "internationally recognised".The 67 expert Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) panels said that another 33% was "internationally recognised".
The results will decide universities' shares of more than £1.5bn, a third of the available research funding.The results will decide universities' shares of more than £1.5bn, a third of the available research funding.
But the funding council has had to defend the way institutions could choose which staff would be assessed.But the funding council has had to defend the way institutions could choose which staff would be assessed.
The results give no indication what proportion of staff in any area were put forward.The results give no indication what proportion of staff in any area were put forward.
"Universities were selective in their strategies for submission," said David Eastwood, chief executive of the Higher Education Funding Council for England (Hefce), which co-ordinated the UK-wide exercise."Universities were selective in their strategies for submission," said David Eastwood, chief executive of the Higher Education Funding Council for England (Hefce), which co-ordinated the UK-wide exercise.
The RAE was last conducted in 2001 though in a different form - so comparisons between the results then and now are not readily possible.The RAE was last conducted in 2001 though in a different form - so comparisons between the results then and now are not readily possible.
'No cosiness''No cosiness'
The expert panels included international members and representatives from research users such as pharmaceutical companies.The expert panels included international members and representatives from research users such as pharmaceutical companies.
They reviewed 220,000 separate research "outputs" - from the purely academic to the highly applied in everything from cutting edge bio-medical research to art therapy, much of it multi-disciplinary.They reviewed 220,000 separate research "outputs" - from the purely academic to the highly applied in everything from cutting edge bio-medical research to art therapy, much of it multi-disciplinary.
Those involved insist this was done with great rigour and no "cosiness" and followed strict calibration procedures to ensure that very different work was assessed equally.Those involved insist this was done with great rigour and no "cosiness" and followed strict calibration procedures to ensure that very different work was assessed equally.
They have produced "profiles" for each subject, showing the proportion of submissions from each institution that fell into five different grades:
  • 4* world leading (17% overall)
  • 3* internationally excellent (37%)
  • 2* internationally recognised (33%)
  • 1* nationally recognised
  • unclassified
They have produced "profiles" for each subject, showing the proportion of submissions from each institution that fell into five different grades:
  • 4* world leading (17% overall)
  • 3* internationally excellent (37%)
  • 2* internationally recognised (33%)
  • 1* nationally recognised
  • unclassified
The effort cost the funding councils at least £12m. Consultants are calculating the indirect cost to universities.The effort cost the funding councils at least £12m. Consultants are calculating the indirect cost to universities.
Prof Eastwood told a news conference in London: "This represents an outstanding achievement, confirming that the UK is among the top rank of research powers in the world."Prof Eastwood told a news conference in London: "This represents an outstanding achievement, confirming that the UK is among the top rank of research powers in the world."
FormulaFormula
But the absence of data on staff numbers as a result of quibbles about Hefce's guidance on who was eligible has cast doubt on the results.But the absence of data on staff numbers as a result of quibbles about Hefce's guidance on who was eligible has cast doubt on the results.
The numbers will have implications for the funding. It will be shared using a formula that gives priority to research quality and "volume" - how many submissions were involved. The more high quality submissions there were, the higher the funding.The numbers will have implications for the funding. It will be shared using a formula that gives priority to research quality and "volume" - how many submissions were involved. The more high quality submissions there were, the higher the funding.
But Hefce is only now beginning work on the funding formula, and institutions' allocations will not be announced until the beginning of March.But Hefce is only now beginning work on the funding formula, and institutions' allocations will not be announced until the beginning of March.
Not surprisingly any rankings are dominated by the research-intensive universities belonging to the Russell Group or the 1994 Group.Not surprisingly any rankings are dominated by the research-intensive universities belonging to the Russell Group or the 1994 Group.
Cambridge had 70% of submissions rated 4* and 3*, while Oxford had 70% - but that covered a slightly larger number of staff. Cambridge had 71% of submissions rated 4* and 3*, while Oxford had 70% - but that covered a slightly larger number of staff.
David Price, research vice-provost at University College London (UCL), said: "I think we do so well because we have so many world class researchers.David Price, research vice-provost at University College London (UCL), said: "I think we do so well because we have so many world class researchers.
"We are a very large institution, and we are consistently able to recruit and retain world leading staff.""We are a very large institution, and we are consistently able to recruit and retain world leading staff."
But the University of Leicester is rated as having the greatest cluster of world-leading researchers of any discipline in any university in the UK.But the University of Leicester is rated as having the greatest cluster of world-leading researchers of any discipline in any university in the UK.
It had 65% of its staff rated 4* and 30% 3* - in museum studies.It had 65% of its staff rated 4* and 30% 3* - in museum studies.