This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/29/books/hitler-biographies-longerich-simms.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Can History’s ‘Great Man’ Theory Explain Hitler? Revisiting Hitler, in a New Authoritarian Age
(1 day later)
When not at work on a book about the roots of anti-Semitism in his country, the German historian and Holocaust expert Peter Longerich has been thinking about 1923.When not at work on a book about the roots of anti-Semitism in his country, the German historian and Holocaust expert Peter Longerich has been thinking about 1923.
In that year, Longerich explained, Germany faced a severe crisis. The economy teetered, separatist movements accelerated in multiple states and, in November, the upstart politician Adolf Hitler attempted a putsch in Bavaria. Still, “the Weimar Republic managed to get through the crisis and stabilize itself.”In that year, Longerich explained, Germany faced a severe crisis. The economy teetered, separatist movements accelerated in multiple states and, in November, the upstart politician Adolf Hitler attempted a putsch in Bavaria. Still, “the Weimar Republic managed to get through the crisis and stabilize itself.”
A decade later, another crisis had a very different outcome: Hitler became Reich Chancellor, quickly eliminated institutional checks on his power, and launched a dictatorship.A decade later, another crisis had a very different outcome: Hitler became Reich Chancellor, quickly eliminated institutional checks on his power, and launched a dictatorship.
How was Hitler able to turn a democratic nation into an autocracy organized around race-based hatred? In recent years, as much of the Western world has seen a notable, sometimes violent turn toward nationalism and anti-Semitism, that question has become one of broad, anxious interest. This fall, two new books seek answers: Longerich’s “Hitler: A Biography” and the Cambridge historian Brendan Simms’s “Hitler: A Global Biography.” Both were underway well before the tumult of current events, but both biographers recognize that recent political trends have made their subject especially charged.How was Hitler able to turn a democratic nation into an autocracy organized around race-based hatred? In recent years, as much of the Western world has seen a notable, sometimes violent turn toward nationalism and anti-Semitism, that question has become one of broad, anxious interest. This fall, two new books seek answers: Longerich’s “Hitler: A Biography” and the Cambridge historian Brendan Simms’s “Hitler: A Global Biography.” Both were underway well before the tumult of current events, but both biographers recognize that recent political trends have made their subject especially charged.
“The questions that Hitler was addressing — inequality, migration, the challenge of international capitalism — they’re as salient as they were when he set out to provide his peculiarly destructive and demented answers,” Simms said. “In a very alarming and upsetting way, Hitler is actually less strange today than he was 20 or 30 years ago.”“The questions that Hitler was addressing — inequality, migration, the challenge of international capitalism — they’re as salient as they were when he set out to provide his peculiarly destructive and demented answers,” Simms said. “In a very alarming and upsetting way, Hitler is actually less strange today than he was 20 or 30 years ago.”
For Longerich, only a few factors separate the events of 1923 and 1933. An alliance between conservative factions that lasted just long enough. A steady degradation of the country’s constitution to prime the path. Most important, a leader who, through acumen, willpower and charisma, united a movement given to immobilizing infighting.For Longerich, only a few factors separate the events of 1923 and 1933. An alliance between conservative factions that lasted just long enough. A steady degradation of the country’s constitution to prime the path. Most important, a leader who, through acumen, willpower and charisma, united a movement given to immobilizing infighting.
For decades, prevailing scholarly attitudes have de-emphasized the centrality of that leader, preferring instead to examine the structures that enabled the broad terror of the Third Reich. “The individual events that were happening, from Warsaw to Norway, from Italy to France, and deep into the Soviet Union, cannot be explained simply by central decision-making,” said Jürgen Matthäus, head of research at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.For decades, prevailing scholarly attitudes have de-emphasized the centrality of that leader, preferring instead to examine the structures that enabled the broad terror of the Third Reich. “The individual events that were happening, from Warsaw to Norway, from Italy to France, and deep into the Soviet Union, cannot be explained simply by central decision-making,” said Jürgen Matthäus, head of research at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
But Longerich and Simms are among several historians to reassess that attitude lately. (Another is Volker Ullrich, author of a recent two-volume biography of Hitler.) It’s not the case that “dangerous developments only stem from social movements or structural trends,” Longerich said. “It can also be, simply, that a person has the abilities to use a certain political situation to set a new agenda.”But Longerich and Simms are among several historians to reassess that attitude lately. (Another is Volker Ullrich, author of a recent two-volume biography of Hitler.) It’s not the case that “dangerous developments only stem from social movements or structural trends,” Longerich said. “It can also be, simply, that a person has the abilities to use a certain political situation to set a new agenda.”
In a 2018 volume of the German Yearbook of Contemporary History devoted to new research on Hitler, the editors Elizabeth Harvey and Johannes Hürter identified a recent “Hitler boom,” an unexpected increase in German research into Hitler beginning around 2013. But they’re wary of ascribing that upswing to public concerns. Academics, Harvey said, are largely not responding to “the worrying upsurge today of right-wing extremism, anti-Semitism, racism, right-wing populism, extremist leader figures” by thinking, “Right, I’m going to go write a better biography of Hitler to cure that.”In a 2018 volume of the German Yearbook of Contemporary History devoted to new research on Hitler, the editors Elizabeth Harvey and Johannes Hürter identified a recent “Hitler boom,” an unexpected increase in German research into Hitler beginning around 2013. But they’re wary of ascribing that upswing to public concerns. Academics, Harvey said, are largely not responding to “the worrying upsurge today of right-wing extremism, anti-Semitism, racism, right-wing populism, extremist leader figures” by thinking, “Right, I’m going to go write a better biography of Hitler to cure that.”
Indeed, professional historians are wary of drawing too many parallels between Hitler and authoritarian-minded present-day leaders. “History,” Matthäus said, “is probably more complex than these analogies would like to have it.”Indeed, professional historians are wary of drawing too many parallels between Hitler and authoritarian-minded present-day leaders. “History,” Matthäus said, “is probably more complex than these analogies would like to have it.”
Simms shares that view. “I don’t think there are any simple partisan points you can make today drawing on the findings of these books,” he said. “If there’s a comparison or a lesson, it’s to take seriously and look closely at what people say and what they argue before they come to power, and not to assume they will be tamed by the structures.” In writing about Hitler’s furious obsession with German emigration to America, Simms (who is British) did include one reference to the contemporary landscape: “The president is mentioned in the book, but only in the context that his grandfather, Frederick Trump, was one of those Germans that left Germany,” he said.Simms shares that view. “I don’t think there are any simple partisan points you can make today drawing on the findings of these books,” he said. “If there’s a comparison or a lesson, it’s to take seriously and look closely at what people say and what they argue before they come to power, and not to assume they will be tamed by the structures.” In writing about Hitler’s furious obsession with German emigration to America, Simms (who is British) did include one reference to the contemporary landscape: “The president is mentioned in the book, but only in the context that his grandfather, Frederick Trump, was one of those Germans that left Germany,” he said.
Simms is a political scientist and a professor of international relations; this is his first biography and his first book to focus on World War II. A significant motivation was personal: “My mother is German, and I grew up for quite a lot of my childhood in Germany,” he said. “My grandfather served in the Second World War on the German side.”Simms is a political scientist and a professor of international relations; this is his first biography and his first book to focus on World War II. A significant motivation was personal: “My mother is German, and I grew up for quite a lot of my childhood in Germany,” he said. “My grandfather served in the Second World War on the German side.”
Longerich — whose previous books include biographies of the Nazi leaders Heinrich Himmler and Joseph Goebbels, as well as “Holocaust: The Nazi Persecution and Murder of the Jews” — has personal reasons for his interest as well. “Of course, you ask yourself: Why are you doing this?” he said. “Why are you so obsessed with this period?”Longerich — whose previous books include biographies of the Nazi leaders Heinrich Himmler and Joseph Goebbels, as well as “Holocaust: The Nazi Persecution and Murder of the Jews” — has personal reasons for his interest as well. “Of course, you ask yourself: Why are you doing this?” he said. “Why are you so obsessed with this period?”
One reason, he said, is that he was born in Germany only a decade after the war ended. “My teachers actually served in the Wehrmacht. My history teacher was a former SS man. It’s difficult to see, the elderly people you know were actively involved in this system.” That difficulty, for him, turned to curiosity over “how rapidly the democratic Weimar Republic, center of modern culture, could turn into a dictatorship — and how quickly this dictatorship could be transformed, again, into a relatively normal democratic society.”One reason, he said, is that he was born in Germany only a decade after the war ended. “My teachers actually served in the Wehrmacht. My history teacher was a former SS man. It’s difficult to see, the elderly people you know were actively involved in this system.” That difficulty, for him, turned to curiosity over “how rapidly the democratic Weimar Republic, center of modern culture, could turn into a dictatorship — and how quickly this dictatorship could be transformed, again, into a relatively normal democratic society.”
Academic caution aside, that curiosity isn’t detached from action; Longerich and Simms have both joined the growing ranks of historians speaking publicly about threats they see in contemporary society. Longerich helped lead a 2012 German parliamentary commission examining anti-Semitism in the country, and Simms is the president of a think tank, the Project for Democratic Union, that supports the constitutional creation of a single European state.Academic caution aside, that curiosity isn’t detached from action; Longerich and Simms have both joined the growing ranks of historians speaking publicly about threats they see in contemporary society. Longerich helped lead a 2012 German parliamentary commission examining anti-Semitism in the country, and Simms is the president of a think tank, the Project for Democratic Union, that supports the constitutional creation of a single European state.
“For historians working on the history of National Socialism,” Elizabeth Harvey said, there’s “a feeling of obligation to intervene in current debates.” The timing of history is delicate, and the life of Hitler remains one of the most incomprehensible examples of how quickly the touch of the wrong person, at the wrong time, can shatter an order that appeared stable. “It was unimaginable,” Longerich said, “how the world I grew up in, only 25 years before, could be so different.”“For historians working on the history of National Socialism,” Elizabeth Harvey said, there’s “a feeling of obligation to intervene in current debates.” The timing of history is delicate, and the life of Hitler remains one of the most incomprehensible examples of how quickly the touch of the wrong person, at the wrong time, can shatter an order that appeared stable. “It was unimaginable,” Longerich said, “how the world I grew up in, only 25 years before, could be so different.”
Follow New York Times Books on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, sign up for our newsletter or our literary calendar. And listen to us on the Book Review podcast.Follow New York Times Books on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, sign up for our newsletter or our literary calendar. And listen to us on the Book Review podcast.