This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/6202623.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
N Korea talks end 'without deal' North Korea talks end in deadlock
(about 4 hours later)
The six-party talks on the dismantling of North Korea's nuclear programme have ended without any real breakthrough, officials are quoted as saying. Six-party talks on the dismantling of North Korea's nuclear programme have ended without any real breakthrough.
Despite five days of negotiations in Beijing, the talks broke up and no date for a resumption has been announced.Despite five days of negotiations in Beijing, the talks broke up and no date for a resumption has been announced.
The talks involved the US, North Korea, China, South Korea, Japan and Russia. US envoy Christopher Hill expressed frustration over Pyongyang's refusal to consider denuclearisation until US financial sanctions were lifted.
They had resumed after a 13-month break, and two months after North Korea sparked international condemnation by carrying out a nuclear test. His Pyongyang counterpart Kim Kye-gwan said lifting sanctions would "create a good atmosphere" for future discussion.
Chinese envoy Wu Dawei released a statement that simply reaffirmed an agreement from September 2005 that the North would agree to disarm in return for aid and guarantees of security. He also warned that North Korea was likely to bolster its nuclear arsenal, not reduce it.
Mr Wu said the six nations would "reconvene at the earliest opportunity". "The US is taking a tactic of both dialogue and pressure, and carrots and sticks," he told reporters.
Stumbling block "We are responding with dialogue and a shield. And by a shield, we are saying we will further improve our deterrent."
Hopes of a breakthrough had faded as the tough negotiations continued into the fifth day. Hopes fade
The talks - which involved the US, North Korea, China, South Korea, Japan and Russia - were the first for 13 months.
N KOREA NUCLEAR PROGRAMME Believed to have 'handful' of nuclear weaponsBut not thought to have any small enough to put in a missileCould try dropping from plane, though world watching closely Low hopes for talks Text of September 2005 deal Talks absorb regional pressN KOREA NUCLEAR PROGRAMME Believed to have 'handful' of nuclear weaponsBut not thought to have any small enough to put in a missileCould try dropping from plane, though world watching closely Low hopes for talks Text of September 2005 deal Talks absorb regional press
The US had criticised Pyongyang over its insistence that US financial sanctions be lifted, while refusing to focus on the question of its denuclearisation. They came two months after North Korea sparked international condemnation by testing a nuclear weapon.
US envoy Christopher Hill accused the North of failing to take the talks seriously. Chinese envoy Wu Dawei ended the talks with a statement that simply reaffirmed an agreement from September 2005 that the North would agree to disarm in return for aid and guarantees of security.
Mr Wu said the six nations would "reconvene at the earliest opportunity".
Hopes of a breakthrough had faded by Friday, despite reports mid-week that the US had offered an incentives package that built on the agreement of September 2005.
Financial sanctions
US treasury officials also met their North Korean counterparts on the sidelines to discuss the financial sanctions. Those talks broke up with a tentative agreement to meet again in the new year.
Mr Hill said the point of the talks had been denuclearisation, and accused the North of failing to take the issue seriously.
"When the [North] raises problems, one day it's financial issues, another day it's something they want but they know they can't have, another day it's something we said about them that hurt their feelings," he said."When the [North] raises problems, one day it's financial issues, another day it's something they want but they know they can't have, another day it's something we said about them that hurt their feelings," he said.
"What they need to do is to get serious about the issue that made them such a problem... their nuclear activities.""What they need to do is to get serious about the issue that made them such a problem... their nuclear activities."
The US has been trying to persuade North Korea to implement the September 2005 deal. Christopher Hill accuses Pyongyang of not taking the talks seriously
Diplomats say the US offered North Korea a further package of incentives - including a written guarantee not to attack - if it agreed to halt its nuclear work and allow verification by UN inspectors. Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe called on the international community to keep up its pressure on North Korea by implementing the UN sanctions agreed after its October test.
But the stumbling block is the US decision, soon after the September 2005 agreement was reached, to blacklist a Macau-based bank containing $24m of North Korean money. North Korea took a defiant stance when the talks opened on Monday, insisting it was unconcerned if other countries did not accept its newly-acquired nuclear status.
Washington accused the bank of involvement in alleged money-laundering and counterfeiting activities by Pyongyang. It led North Korea to walk out of the talks. It insisted from the start that it wanted to see US financial sanctions lifted before it would consider the issue of its nuclear programme.
Pyongyang walked out of the talks 13 months ago after the US blacklisted a Macau-based bank containing large sums of North Korean money.
Washington accused the bank of involvement in alleged money-laundering and counterfeiting activities by Pyongyang.