This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2019/jul/24/peter-dutton-misses-deadline-to-hand-over-manus-paladin-document-politics-live
The article has changed 19 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 14 | Version 15 |
|---|---|
| Repealing medevac would be 'a wicked thing', Centre Alliance says – politics live | Repealing medevac would be 'a wicked thing', Centre Alliance says – politics live |
| (32 minutes later) | |
| On medevac, Rex Patrick said Centre Alliance and Jacqui Lambie (they have a loose alliance) met with Peter Dutton today to discuss the temporary exclusion orders, but they have not discussed the medevac repeal as yet. Lambie is the swing vote. | |
| Rex Patrick: | |
| I sat down with Jacqui and Peter Dutton today to discuss the foreign fighters bill and that is because we have some common ground. In other situations where there is no common ground Jacqui will go off and negotiate and discuss with the minister on her own as we do. | |
| ... It [the medevac repeal] has not arrived. It is not on the radar. | |
| ... We understand the bill very well. If there were some difficulties that the government had, in terms of people who have been repatriated for that medical attention, we would be happy to discuss that with Peter Dutton and happy to do that with Jacqui. If there are problems with the bill we would happily tweak it. But our understanding is that I think it is something like 21 or 22 people have been back to Australia for medical attention and then sent back to Papua New Guinea. | |
| On the ensuring integrity bill, Rex Patrick says there are political elements to the bill it can’t support: | On the ensuring integrity bill, Rex Patrick says there are political elements to the bill it can’t support: |
| The aim was to deal with misconduct and there is no question that has been in the union movement. | The aim was to deal with misconduct and there is no question that has been in the union movement. |
| I have seen the fairly significant sheet of judicial rulings against some of the unions and in some instances we have some very conservative, considered judicial officers stating things like this union is simply using the fines, treating the fines, as the cost of business. | |
| We cannot have that situation, so we must have a bill that deals with that sort of egregious behaviour and it must also be fair and you cannot have misconduct in the corporate sector and we saw a lot of that was revealed in the royal commission, and do without it the same time. | |
| We are asking the government to make sure that whatever is in the bill is consistent with the corporate world. An example: under the current union bill, ensuring integrity bill, the minister can make a referral to make a deregistration. That does not happen in the corporate world. | |
| There is a political element today that we are uncomfortable with – and [we] would like to see it removed. | |
| But if the legislation applies to all, then Centre Alliance will support it. If the government doesn’t amend it, it will weigh up its options then. | But if the legislation applies to all, then Centre Alliance will support it. If the government doesn’t amend it, it will weigh up its options then. |
| Rex Patrick is speaking to Patricia Karvelas on Afternoon Briefing and says while Centre Alliance supports the intent of the temporary exclusion order bill, it will abstain from voting for it, because it can’t support it in its current form. | Rex Patrick is speaking to Patricia Karvelas on Afternoon Briefing and says while Centre Alliance supports the intent of the temporary exclusion order bill, it will abstain from voting for it, because it can’t support it in its current form. |
| Labor will be passing it, although it has raised its own concerns. | Labor will be passing it, although it has raised its own concerns. |
| Rachel Siewert has had a win in the Senate. It’s just a motion, but it further indicates that half the parliament is now officially on board with raising the Newstart rate: | Rachel Siewert has had a win in the Senate. It’s just a motion, but it further indicates that half the parliament is now officially on board with raising the Newstart rate: |
| This is a historic moment. | This is a historic moment. |
| I am very pleased that the Senate has agreed that Newstart is too low. | I am very pleased that the Senate has agreed that Newstart is too low. |
| I’ve introduced countless motions to increase Newstart over the years that have been voted down, time and again. | I’ve introduced countless motions to increase Newstart over the years that have been voted down, time and again. |
| Just like with marriage equality, just like with the banking royal commission, the Greens have continued to campaign, in partnership with the community, to achieve change. I will continue to introduce bills and motions to our parliament until we get an increase to Newstart. | Just like with marriage equality, just like with the banking royal commission, the Greens have continued to campaign, in partnership with the community, to achieve change. I will continue to introduce bills and motions to our parliament until we get an increase to Newstart. |
| The evidence is well and truly in, we know we need an urgent increase by at least $75 a week. | The evidence is well and truly in, we know we need an urgent increase by at least $75 a week. |
| The government is out of step with community expectations and there is no excuse not to increase the rate of Newstart right now. | The government is out of step with community expectations and there is no excuse not to increase the rate of Newstart right now. |
| Question time finally ended. | Question time finally ended. |
| There is a God. | There is a God. |
| Meanwhile, it has been pointed out to me that Peter Dutton, when talking to Sky earlier today, blamed people lying on their departure cards as one of the reasons the government doesn’t know where foreign fighters ended up: | Meanwhile, it has been pointed out to me that Peter Dutton, when talking to Sky earlier today, blamed people lying on their departure cards as one of the reasons the government doesn’t know where foreign fighters ended up: |
| .@PeterDutton_MP on foreign fighter laws: There are many ways in which we can deal with individuals to try & mitigate the threat. We are not immune from a terrorist attack here but we are doing everything we can to keep Australia safe.MORE: https://t.co/sqTia8WvKA #firstedition pic.twitter.com/LZksHnKTlG | .@PeterDutton_MP on foreign fighter laws: There are many ways in which we can deal with individuals to try & mitigate the threat. We are not immune from a terrorist attack here but we are doing everything we can to keep Australia safe.MORE: https://t.co/sqTia8WvKA #firstedition pic.twitter.com/LZksHnKTlG |
| Just noting that departure cards were abolished by the government, under Dutton, in 2017. | Just noting that departure cards were abolished by the government, under Dutton, in 2017. |
| Breaking – the PAPERS ARE STACKED. | Breaking – the PAPERS ARE STACKED. |
| This is almost over, people. | This is almost over, people. |
| Ted O’Brien invites Peter Dutton back up for another HOW SAFE ARE YOU segment. | Ted O’Brien invites Peter Dutton back up for another HOW SAFE ARE YOU segment. |
| This latest episode comes with a side of WHOSE SIDE ARE YOU ON. | This latest episode comes with a side of WHOSE SIDE ARE YOU ON. |
| Michael McCormack is now confusing the electorates of Rankin and Moreton. | Michael McCormack is now confusing the electorates of Rankin and Moreton. |
| The paper is still not being shuffled on the prime minister’s desk. | The paper is still not being shuffled on the prime minister’s desk. |
| McCormack is talking about “record amounts of money” and “busting congestion”. | McCormack is talking about “record amounts of money” and “busting congestion”. |
| I will pay all the money I have in the world to stop this now. | I will pay all the money I have in the world to stop this now. |
| For the third time this week, someone didn’t jump for their question. | For the third time this week, someone didn’t jump for their question. |
| It looks like it was supposed to be the independent’s question again (that is what happened yesterday). | It looks like it was supposed to be the independent’s question again (that is what happened yesterday). |
| But the next MP on the government dixer roster should have jumped up. And they didn’t. For the third time this week. | But the next MP on the government dixer roster should have jumped up. And they didn’t. For the third time this week. |
| So Graham Perrett gets in another question for Labor: | So Graham Perrett gets in another question for Labor: |
| It’s on infrastructure again, which means it is Michael McCormack again, but he still can’t tell you when that infrastructure will start. But he can tell you what Labor promised to do. | It’s on infrastructure again, which means it is Michael McCormack again, but he still can’t tell you when that infrastructure will start. But he can tell you what Labor promised to do. |
| Cool. | Cool. |
| Michael McCormack is back up, and is now talking like a chipmunk, if it had fallen out of a tree and could speak English. | Michael McCormack is back up, and is now talking like a chipmunk, if it had fallen out of a tree and could speak English. |
| As was just pointed out by a press gallery colleague – we haven’t seen the prime minister welcome Boris Johnson as prime minister. | As was just pointed out by a press gallery colleague – we haven’t seen the prime minister welcome Boris Johnson as prime minister. |
| There have been some member statements, but nothing from Scott Morrison in the House. (There was a tweet, I think.) | There have been some member statements, but nothing from Scott Morrison in the House. (There was a tweet, I think.) |
| Meryl Swanson to Michael McCormack. | Meryl Swanson to Michael McCormack. |
| Why is only 3% of the funding to extend the M1 to Raymond Terrace available in the next four years? 3%. | Why is only 3% of the funding to extend the M1 to Raymond Terrace available in the next four years? 3%. |
| WB: | WB: |
| It is better than some of the funding that Labor gave to some of the electorates when it was in. As I said in my previous answer ... That is a responsible way to rollout infrastructure. Not like, and the Member for Patterson, I appreciate, is in a regional electorate, and when Labor were last in government, regional spend was $404m. That was for the electorate of Patterson and other regional electorates. We have doubled and tripled, spending our past two terms and we will now spend six times that amount over the next three years ... | It is better than some of the funding that Labor gave to some of the electorates when it was in. As I said in my previous answer ... That is a responsible way to rollout infrastructure. Not like, and the Member for Patterson, I appreciate, is in a regional electorate, and when Labor were last in government, regional spend was $404m. That was for the electorate of Patterson and other regional electorates. We have doubled and tripled, spending our past two terms and we will now spend six times that amount over the next three years ... |
| It keeps going, but I cannot. | It keeps going, but I cannot. |