This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jun/27/surrey-train-accused-told-ex-he-had-done-something-bad-court-hears

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Surrey train murder: accused told ex he had done 'something bad', court hears Surrey train death: accused told ex he had done 'something bad', court hears
(about 13 hours later)
A man accused of murdering another train passenger rang his ex-girlfriend hours after the attack and told her he had “done something bad”, a court has heard.A man accused of murdering another train passenger rang his ex-girlfriend hours after the attack and told her he had “done something bad”, a court has heard.
Lee Pomeroy, 51, was stabbed by 36-year-old Darren Pencille five minutes after boarding a London-bound train at Guildford, Surrey, on 4 January with his 14-year-old son, the Old Bailey has heard.Lee Pomeroy, 51, was stabbed by 36-year-old Darren Pencille five minutes after boarding a London-bound train at Guildford, Surrey, on 4 January with his 14-year-old son, the Old Bailey has heard.
Jurors have previously been told how it is claimed a row which erupted between the IT consultant and Pencille was over the blocking of an aisle.Jurors have previously been told how it is claimed a row which erupted between the IT consultant and Pencille was over the blocking of an aisle.
Pencille’s former partner and mother of his child, Sarah Fry, who gave evidence by video link, told the jury he rang her at about 9.30pm and said: “I have done something bad today, you’ll see it in the news.”Pencille’s former partner and mother of his child, Sarah Fry, who gave evidence by video link, told the jury he rang her at about 9.30pm and said: “I have done something bad today, you’ll see it in the news.”
The defendant later sent her a text at 1am apologising and saying he loved them, Fry said.The defendant later sent her a text at 1am apologising and saying he loved them, Fry said.
The court also heard from Ingrid Robertson, the defendant’s mother, who, when questioned by Justin Rouse QC representing Pencille, said that when her son was in his 20s, she was told he had paranoid schizophrenia.The court also heard from Ingrid Robertson, the defendant’s mother, who, when questioned by Justin Rouse QC representing Pencille, said that when her son was in his 20s, she was told he had paranoid schizophrenia.
She revealed her son had been admitted to hospital on a few occasions, had a “fear of crowds”, and struggled on public transport – sometimes ringing her in a panic saying he “needed to get off quickly”.She revealed her son had been admitted to hospital on a few occasions, had a “fear of crowds”, and struggled on public transport – sometimes ringing her in a panic saying he “needed to get off quickly”.
“He always thought people were looking at him or wanted to do something to him,” Robertson told the Old Bailey.“He always thought people were looking at him or wanted to do something to him,” Robertson told the Old Bailey.
The witness Kayleigh Carter, who also gave evidence during the trial on Thursday, was asked by Rouse whether Pomeroy had been picking on his client.The witness Kayleigh Carter, who also gave evidence during the trial on Thursday, was asked by Rouse whether Pomeroy had been picking on his client.
Seated behind a screen as she recalled the incident, she said: “I wouldn’t say picking on him, but he was taunting him.”Seated behind a screen as she recalled the incident, she said: “I wouldn’t say picking on him, but he was taunting him.”
Carter told Jacob Hallam QC, prosecuting, she remembered one of the men saying “all I did was be in the way”, which she thought was petty.Carter told Jacob Hallam QC, prosecuting, she remembered one of the men saying “all I did was be in the way”, which she thought was petty.
She told the jury the two men were talking at first, but not very loudly and directly to each other, adding: “It seemed like they had a tiff.”She told the jury the two men were talking at first, but not very loudly and directly to each other, adding: “It seemed like they had a tiff.”
Carter said Pencille was angry, but that she did not sense the same emotions from Pomeroy, stating he was more “stern, stubborn and patronising”.Carter said Pencille was angry, but that she did not sense the same emotions from Pomeroy, stating he was more “stern, stubborn and patronising”.
Pomeroy saying “I have never dealt with someone with special needs before” was the first thing Carter heard that was “really fuelling the anger”, she told the court.Pomeroy saying “I have never dealt with someone with special needs before” was the first thing Carter heard that was “really fuelling the anger”, she told the court.
She said Pencille then said “I am hearing voices right now”, which panicked her.She said Pencille then said “I am hearing voices right now”, which panicked her.
Carter said Pencille picked up a phone and that she clearly heard him say “I am going to kill this man”, adding that she did not think the call was real, as it went through quite quickly.Carter said Pencille picked up a phone and that she clearly heard him say “I am going to kill this man”, adding that she did not think the call was real, as it went through quite quickly.
She said both men were saying they were going to fight at the next station, with the pair eventually becoming “really up and personal”, adding that “neither of them were backing down”.She said both men were saying they were going to fight at the next station, with the pair eventually becoming “really up and personal”, adding that “neither of them were backing down”.
Hearing Pencille call Pomeroy a racist, she said he responded by saying that if anyone was a racist it was him.Hearing Pencille call Pomeroy a racist, she said he responded by saying that if anyone was a racist it was him.
Carter said she saw Pencille strike Pomeroy first, telling the court: “I saw blood straight away, I panicked after that because I had to run through it.”Carter said she saw Pencille strike Pomeroy first, telling the court: “I saw blood straight away, I panicked after that because I had to run through it.”
Heading into another carriage and past the two men, she said blood ended up on her bag.Heading into another carriage and past the two men, she said blood ended up on her bag.
The court has previously heard how Pomeroy, who was due to turn 52 the day after the “quick and frenzied attack”, was stabbed 18 times in 25 seconds.The court has previously heard how Pomeroy, who was due to turn 52 the day after the “quick and frenzied attack”, was stabbed 18 times in 25 seconds.
A forensic pathologist, Dr Olaf Biedrzycki, told the jury that Pomeroy had a number of knife injuries including a 10cm (3.93in) deep stab wound, as well as defensive cuts to his hands and arms.A forensic pathologist, Dr Olaf Biedrzycki, told the jury that Pomeroy had a number of knife injuries including a 10cm (3.93in) deep stab wound, as well as defensive cuts to his hands and arms.
He said Pomeroy had a 6cm deep wound to the left side of his neck, with the knife having cut his jugular vein and carotid artery.He said Pomeroy had a 6cm deep wound to the left side of his neck, with the knife having cut his jugular vein and carotid artery.
“That essentially means that you would have to have instant, immediate surgery in theatre to have any chance of surviving,” he said of the neck wound, adding how “moderate force” was used to inflict the stab injuries.“That essentially means that you would have to have instant, immediate surgery in theatre to have any chance of surviving,” he said of the neck wound, adding how “moderate force” was used to inflict the stab injuries.
Afterwards, Pencille’s girlfriend, Chelsea Mitchell, 27, allegedly picked him up and bought hair clippers and razors for him to change his appearance.Afterwards, Pencille’s girlfriend, Chelsea Mitchell, 27, allegedly picked him up and bought hair clippers and razors for him to change his appearance.
Pencille, of no fixed address, denies murder, and Mitchell, of Farnham, Surrey, has pleaded not guilty to assisting an offender.Pencille, of no fixed address, denies murder, and Mitchell, of Farnham, Surrey, has pleaded not guilty to assisting an offender.
The jury heard how data from their mobile phones showed Mitchell’s device was being used to search for news of the stabbing, while Pencille’s was used to look for hotels in Sussex and near Gatwick.The jury heard how data from their mobile phones showed Mitchell’s device was being used to search for news of the stabbing, while Pencille’s was used to look for hotels in Sussex and near Gatwick.
The trial continues.The trial continues.
UK newsUK news
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content