This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/apr/25/change-uk-and-the-european-elections

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Change UK and the European elections Change UK and the European elections
(about 2 months later)
Tony Greaves’s suggestion (Letters, 23 April) that, to avoid splitting votes in the European elections, the three pro-remain parties should divide up the English regions between them will not work. Neither will Dick Bateman’s proposal that these parties should form a “stay coalition”. Change UK has already rebuffed overtures from the Lib Dems. The situation is a bit like the “tragedy of the commons”: individual parties are acting independently and contrary to the common good by depleting a resource (votes) that they could maximise via collective action. A mixture of self-interest and over-confidence may be to blame.Tony Greaves’s suggestion (Letters, 23 April) that, to avoid splitting votes in the European elections, the three pro-remain parties should divide up the English regions between them will not work. Neither will Dick Bateman’s proposal that these parties should form a “stay coalition”. Change UK has already rebuffed overtures from the Lib Dems. The situation is a bit like the “tragedy of the commons”: individual parties are acting independently and contrary to the common good by depleting a resource (votes) that they could maximise via collective action. A mixture of self-interest and over-confidence may be to blame.
There is a possible solution. An organisation respected by pro-remain voters, such as the People’s Vote Campaign, or an individual who holds their confidence, such as Gina Miller, could divide up the English regions equally between the three parties (with or without their agreement). The allocation could be purely random or take account of which of the three parties is most likely to maximise the remain vote in different constituencies.There is a possible solution. An organisation respected by pro-remain voters, such as the People’s Vote Campaign, or an individual who holds their confidence, such as Gina Miller, could divide up the English regions equally between the three parties (with or without their agreement). The allocation could be purely random or take account of which of the three parties is most likely to maximise the remain vote in different constituencies.
Pro-remain voters could then vote according to the party that has received the imprimatur of the allocating authority. The main problem would be in disseminating this information: a large “R” on the ballot paper next to the chosen candidate is probably out of the question. But traditional and social media could play a part.Nigel HarveySt Albans, HertfordshirePro-remain voters could then vote according to the party that has received the imprimatur of the allocating authority. The main problem would be in disseminating this information: a large “R” on the ballot paper next to the chosen candidate is probably out of the question. But traditional and social media could play a part.Nigel HarveySt Albans, Hertfordshire
• Now Change UK has discovered that it’s actually the party on the ballot paper that people vote for, not the individual (Rachel Johnson and Gavin Esler to stand for Change UK, 24 April), will we see all of the TIG MPs at Westminster resign their seats and stand as Change UK candidates at byelections? This will allow their constituents to decide whether they want to be represented by Change UK or another party. Or is this not what they meant?Martin FreedmanLondon• Now Change UK has discovered that it’s actually the party on the ballot paper that people vote for, not the individual (Rachel Johnson and Gavin Esler to stand for Change UK, 24 April), will we see all of the TIG MPs at Westminster resign their seats and stand as Change UK candidates at byelections? This will allow their constituents to decide whether they want to be represented by Change UK or another party. Or is this not what they meant?Martin FreedmanLondon
• Change UK is struggling to differentiate itself from the pack – even to the extent of fielding a member of the Johnson family. While a strengthened Lib Dem presence at Westminster would be of no lasting value, it should be clear to those who wish to remain in the EU, especially the ultras of Change UK, that getting behind the only UK-wide party that is unashamedly pro-European could be in the national interest.• Change UK is struggling to differentiate itself from the pack – even to the extent of fielding a member of the Johnson family. While a strengthened Lib Dem presence at Westminster would be of no lasting value, it should be clear to those who wish to remain in the EU, especially the ultras of Change UK, that getting behind the only UK-wide party that is unashamedly pro-European could be in the national interest.
Embracing the party that sustained David Cameron’s government for five years is likely to be problematic for many electors, but not so for TIG’s founders. However, it would bring into question the strength of their commitment to real change rather than vanity and career opportunities.Les BrightExeter, DevonEmbracing the party that sustained David Cameron’s government for five years is likely to be problematic for many electors, but not so for TIG’s founders. However, it would bring into question the strength of their commitment to real change rather than vanity and career opportunities.Les BrightExeter, Devon
• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com
• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters
• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition
European electionsEuropean elections
BrexitBrexit
Article 50Article 50
European UnionEuropean Union
Foreign policyForeign policy
Change UK – The Independent Group Independent Group for Change
Gina MillerGina Miller
lettersletters
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content