This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/16/us/felicity-huffman-sentence.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Felicity Huffman Should Get Prison Time in Admissions Scandal, Prosecutors Say Felicity Huffman Should Get Prison Time in Admissions Scandal, Prosecutors Say
(5 months later)
Prosecutors argued that the Hollywood actress Felicity Huffman should get a prison sentence between four and 10 months for paying a college consultant to arrange for cheating on her daughter’s SAT, court documents show. The prosecutors plan to push for the low end of that range.Prosecutors argued that the Hollywood actress Felicity Huffman should get a prison sentence between four and 10 months for paying a college consultant to arrange for cheating on her daughter’s SAT, court documents show. The prosecutors plan to push for the low end of that range.
[Actress Felicity Huffman is the first parent to be sentenced for her role in the nation’s largest college admissions cheating prosecution.]
The prosecutors’ recommendation for prison time in the case of Ms. Huffman, among the best-known of 33 parents charged in what the Justice Department has said is its largest-ever college admissions prosecution, offers insight into a question that has lingered over the case: Will some of the wealthy and well-connected parents implicated in the scandal end up serving time?The prosecutors’ recommendation for prison time in the case of Ms. Huffman, among the best-known of 33 parents charged in what the Justice Department has said is its largest-ever college admissions prosecution, offers insight into a question that has lingered over the case: Will some of the wealthy and well-connected parents implicated in the scandal end up serving time?
Ms. Huffman said last week that she intended to plead guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud. In a plea agreement, prosecutors said that Ms. Huffman’s crime corresponded to a federal sentencing guideline of four to 10 months in prison and that they would recommend a sentence at the low end of that range, along with a fine of $20,000 and 12 months of supervised release.Ms. Huffman said last week that she intended to plead guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud. In a plea agreement, prosecutors said that Ms. Huffman’s crime corresponded to a federal sentencing guideline of four to 10 months in prison and that they would recommend a sentence at the low end of that range, along with a fine of $20,000 and 12 months of supervised release.
The federal sentencing guidelines are advisory, and judges may impose sentences that are either heavier or lighter than the advised range. The plea agreement also notes that Ms. Huffman “reserves the right to argue” that her crime actually corresponds to a lower guideline — of zero to six months of incarceration.The federal sentencing guidelines are advisory, and judges may impose sentences that are either heavier or lighter than the advised range. The plea agreement also notes that Ms. Huffman “reserves the right to argue” that her crime actually corresponds to a lower guideline — of zero to six months of incarceration.
[Read more on the question of prison time in the college admissions case.][Read more on the question of prison time in the college admissions case.]
According to the charges, Ms. Huffman paid $15,000 to William Singer, a consultant at the center of the case, so that a proctor would correct some of her daughter’s answers on the SAT after the girl had finished the test and left. Mr. Singer has pleaded guilty to racketeering and other charges. Ms. Huffman’s daughter, who was apparently unaware of her mother’s plan and to whom Ms. Huffman has publicly apologized, is still in high school.According to the charges, Ms. Huffman paid $15,000 to William Singer, a consultant at the center of the case, so that a proctor would correct some of her daughter’s answers on the SAT after the girl had finished the test and left. Mr. Singer has pleaded guilty to racketeering and other charges. Ms. Huffman’s daughter, who was apparently unaware of her mother’s plan and to whom Ms. Huffman has publicly apologized, is still in high school.
Twelve other parents charged in the case have said that they will plead guilty. Prosecutors are arguing for longer sentences than the one proposed for Ms. Huffman in the cases of several of the other parents, because they are accused of paying more money as part of the scheme.Twelve other parents charged in the case have said that they will plead guilty. Prosecutors are arguing for longer sentences than the one proposed for Ms. Huffman in the cases of several of the other parents, because they are accused of paying more money as part of the scheme.
In the case of Bruce Isackson, who has agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy to commit fraud and money laundering and to defraud the United States, prosecutors have said they will recommend a sentence at the low end of a guidelines range of 37 to 46 months. Prosecutors accused Mr. Isackson and his wife, Davina, of paying Mr. Singer a total of $600,000 to facilitate cheating on the ACT for one daughter and to get two daughters admitted to the University of California at Los Angeles and the University of Southern California as athletic recruits.In the case of Bruce Isackson, who has agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy to commit fraud and money laundering and to defraud the United States, prosecutors have said they will recommend a sentence at the low end of a guidelines range of 37 to 46 months. Prosecutors accused Mr. Isackson and his wife, Davina, of paying Mr. Singer a total of $600,000 to facilitate cheating on the ACT for one daughter and to get two daughters admitted to the University of California at Los Angeles and the University of Southern California as athletic recruits.
More than a dozen other parents, including the actress Lori Loughlin and her husband, the designer Mossimo Giannulli, have pleaded not guilty.More than a dozen other parents, including the actress Lori Loughlin and her husband, the designer Mossimo Giannulli, have pleaded not guilty.
The United States attorney’s office in Boston charged 50 people in the case, including college coaches and administrators of the SAT and the ACT.The United States attorney’s office in Boston charged 50 people in the case, including college coaches and administrators of the SAT and the ACT.