This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/01/us/politics/senate-disaster-relief-puerto-rico.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Impasse Over Aid for Puerto Rico Stalls Billions in Federal Disaster Relief Impasse Over Aid for Puerto Rico Stalls Billions in Federal Disaster Relief
(about 3 hours later)
WASHINGTON — The Senate on Monday blocked billions of dollars in disaster aid for states across the country as Republicans and Democrats clashed over President Trump’s opposition to sending more food and infrastructure help to Puerto Rico.WASHINGTON — The Senate on Monday blocked billions of dollars in disaster aid for states across the country as Republicans and Democrats clashed over President Trump’s opposition to sending more food and infrastructure help to Puerto Rico.
Most Senate Republicans refused to endorse a recovery bill passed this year by the House, citing Mr. Trump’s opposition to the bill’s Puerto Rico funding and their own concerns that the bill lacks money for Midwestern states that have since been devastated by flooding and tornadoes. (An amendment that would have added the funds was blocked earlier in the day.) Opposition came from both parties for different reasons. Most Republicans refused to endorse a recovery bill passed this year by the House. They cited Mr. Trump’s opposition to the bill’s Puerto Rico funding, as well as their own concerns that the bill lacked money for Midwestern states, like Iowa and Nebraska, that have since been devastated by flooding and tornadoes.
And for their part, a majority of Senate Democrats balked at a measure drafted by Senate Republicans that included the money for the Midwestern states, arguing that about $600 million in nutritional assistance for Puerto Rico was not enough for the island. The Republican legislation, House Democrats had warned, would be dead on arrival in the lower chamber. For their part, Democrats balked at a separate measure drafted by Senate Republicans that included the money for the Midwest, arguing that a proposed $600 million in nutritional assistance for Puerto Rico was not enough. The Republican legislation had no chance in the House.
With the defeat of both procedural votes, it was unclear how lawmakers would overcome the impasse and end the indefinite delay in disbursing funds. Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the majority leader, voted against both measures in order to invoke a procedural motion that would allow him to schedule future votes, signaling that he plans to maintain pressure on Democrats. The votes on both measures were procedural and needed support from 60 senators to advance to a full floor vote. Neither won the support required. It was unclear late Monday how lawmakers would overcome that impasse and end the delay in disbursing the disaster aid.
On Tuesday, Senate Democrats will propose an amendment to the House legislation that would allocate billions of dollars, in part for long-term recovery, to both Iowa and Nebraska as well as Puerto Rico, according to a Senate Democratic aide. The effort begins anew on Tuesday, when Senate Democrats will propose a measure that would allocate billions of dollars that would help Iowa and Nebraska, as well as Puerto Rico, according to a Senate Democratic aide.
Earlier Monday, Mr. Trump had doubled down on his support for the Senate Republicans’ proposal, but made no mention of Puerto Rico — a frequent target of his ire. Mr. Trump has been pressuring Democrats to support a disaster relief measure that does not include the money they want for Puerto Rico, and he went on the attack late Monday on Twitter.
“Democrats should stop fighting Sen. David Perdue’s disaster relief bill,” he wrote on Twitter, singling out Mr. Perdue, Republican of Georgia, who helped write the bill. “They are blocking funding and relief for our great farmers and rural America!” “The Democrats today killed a Bill that would have provided great relief to Farmers and yet more money to Puerto Rico despite the fact that Puerto Rico has already been scheduled to receive more hurricane relief funding than any ‘place’ in history,” he tweeted.
And in a closed-door lunch last week with Senate Republicans, the president complained about the cost of aid to the island, though it was unclear where he was getting his information from. Puerto Ricans “are great,” he added, but “their government can’t do anything right, the place is a mess - nothing works.”
The procedural votes, while failing to solidify billions of dollars in recovery aid, will most likely serve as political fodder for both parties. Even before the votes, Republicans had begun singling out senators embroiled in a crowded Democratic presidential primary. Varying forms of recovery legislation have been in limbo since December, when an initial version was tacked on to legislation that could have prevented the 35-day government shutdown. And while the House passed a relief package in January, it was ultimately left out of the compromise measure that reopened the government.
Some lawmakers were optimistic that a resolution could be found quickly. Democrats in both chambers have pushed for a select group of lawmakers to draft legislation that borrows from both measures.
“I’m sure we’ll start talking again,” said Senator Richard C. Shelby, Republican of Alabama and the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee. He compared the negotiating process to a three-legged stool: “You’ve got the House, you’ve got the Senate and the presidency.”
“We’re hopefully at a point where we can get some serious negotiations going,” he said.
Still, senators from both parties tried to used the disaster relief votes to their political advantage.
Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida, said that “tonight, my colleagues had the opportunity to choose action over obstruction.”
“Shamefully,” he added, “Senate Democrats said no.”
Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, said in a statement that “Congress used to set politics aside after major disasters and help victims in their time of need — partisan infighting won’t rebuild a single home or school.”
Even Puerto Rican politicians could not agree on which of the measures to support. Gov. Ricardo A. Rosselló, a Democrat, urged lawmakers to endorse the House legislation. But Representative Jenniffer González-Colón, a Republican, spoke out in favor of the Senate measure. Ms. González-Colón is the island’s sole representative in Congress, but she cannot vote.
Even before the votes on Monday, Republicans had tried to turn disaster relief into a 2020 presidential campaign issue.
“To my colleagues across the aisle who have been spending a lot of time in Iowa lately as presidential candidates,” Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, said on the Senate floor, “how are you going to look Iowans in the eye and justify a vote against moving this disaster relief bill ahead?”“To my colleagues across the aisle who have been spending a lot of time in Iowa lately as presidential candidates,” Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, said on the Senate floor, “how are you going to look Iowans in the eye and justify a vote against moving this disaster relief bill ahead?”
And Democrats have sought to frame Republican opposition as a slight against Puerto Rico, a United States territory without voting representation. Democrats have sought to frame Republican opposition as a slight against Puerto Rico.
“Nutrition assistance is not enough — Puerto Rico needs to rebuild,” said Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, the ranking member on the Senate Appropriations Committee, speaking before the vote. “Nutrition assistance is not enough — Puerto Rico needs to rebuild,” said Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, the ranking member on the Senate Appropriations Committee.