This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2019/apr/01/government-touts-budget-surplus-as-labor-draws-climate-lines-politics-live

The article has changed 17 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
Coalition begins 'carbon tax' assault on Labor climate policy – politics live Coalition begins 'carbon tax' assault on Labor climate policy – politics live
(32 minutes later)
You are going to hear a lot about Queensland’s land clearing laws in the next few weeks – because that is essentially what Labor is talking about, when it says its an area it wants to tackle.
So, in a nutshell, what are they?
Well, in 2004, the then-Labor Queensland state government passed laws which added a lot more bureaucracy for farmers who wanted to clear land. Basically, they had to get permission from the department before they could move forward. Landowners complained the process was too onerous and delayed and they were unable to prepare for fire season, and natural disasters.
So when the LNP Campbell Newman government came in, they scrapped the laws, and gave the landowners the power to make their own decisions (essentially).
And then land clearing went a bit nuts.
The rate of excessive tree clearing in Queensland has skyrocketed, reaching an alarming rate of 395,000 hectares in 2015-16, according to the annual deforestation report released today.
The 2015-16 Statewide Landcover and Trees Study (SLATS) also showed the rate of tree-clearing in the Great Barrier Reef catchments had soared by almost 50 per cent since 2012-2013.”
The Palaszczuk Labor government attempted to change the laws after winning the 2015 election, but without majority numbers, failed.
So they brought it back after the 2017 election, when, with a majority, they passed (but not without a fight – the committee looking at the bill received 13,000 submissions, the most any Qld government committee has ever received)
So land clearing in Queensland, in a lot of cases, needs oversight once again.
Farmers are still annoyed. Very annoyed. Environmental groups think the laws are better, but still have massive loopholes. So no one is completely satisfied. And as federal Labor looks to move forward with similar laws from a national standpoint, you’ll hear a lot more from all sides.
Senator Tim Storer has released a proposed integrity package in the last sitting week of parliament. Storer is up for re-election and although he came in on the Nick Xenophon/Centre Alliance ticket he has since gone independent, a tough path to re-election, meaning this week is likely to be his last.
I’ve done some poking around and while the proposal – which will come before the Senate in the form of a motion – has some support on the crossbench, there are a few planks that go too far for Labor. Those include the proposed overhaul of lobbyist rules, binding standards for parliamentarians expected to mirror the ministerial standards and a parliamentary integrity commissioner.
Here is the full proposal:
On Saturday the Morrison government announced strict new laws to crack down on social media companies which fail to remove violent content quickly enough. Creating criminal offences for failure to remove content would include penalties including fines and jail terms.On Saturday the Morrison government announced strict new laws to crack down on social media companies which fail to remove violent content quickly enough. Creating criminal offences for failure to remove content would include penalties including fines and jail terms.
A spokesman for attorney general Christian Porter told Guardian Australia the government will “certainly be introducing [it] this week with [a] view to having it dealt with in both houses”. A spokesman for the attorney general, Christian Porter, told Guardian Australia the government would “certainly be introducing [it] this week with [a] view to having it dealt with in both houses”.
So it’s a top priority - just like the big rush to increase penalties for putting needles in strawberries. So it’s a top priority just like the big rush to increase penalties for putting needles in strawberries.
Trouble is, Labor hasn’t seen the legislation yet (and nor have we, for that matter).Trouble is, Labor hasn’t seen the legislation yet (and nor have we, for that matter).
Labor is now warning this is a “ridiculous timetable”.Shadow attorney general Mark Dreyfus: Labor is now warning this is a “ridiculous timetable”. The shadow attorney general, Mark Dreyfus:
“Labor is committed to holding the social media companies to account – they can, and they must do better. What happened following the Christchurch attack can never happen again. Labor is committed to holding the social media companies to account – they can, and they must do better. What happened following the Christchurch attack can never happen again.
Despite repeated requests, the government is yet to provide draft legislation regarding proposed social media regulation to the Opposition for scrutiny. If the government wishes to make this legislation law this sitting week, it will need to pass both the House and the Senate by end of day Wednesday. This ridiculous timetable is a direct result of the government being too frightened to hold an adequate number of parliamentary sitting days before the election.Despite repeated requests, the government is yet to provide draft legislation regarding proposed social media regulation to the Opposition for scrutiny. If the government wishes to make this legislation law this sitting week, it will need to pass both the House and the Senate by end of day Wednesday. This ridiculous timetable is a direct result of the government being too frightened to hold an adequate number of parliamentary sitting days before the election.
Once the legislation is received, Labor will scrutinise it thoroughly and provide further comment.” Once the legislation is received, Labor will scrutinise it thoroughly and provide further comment.
There is no budget tree this year (even though winter has arrived ALREADY despite only just being April and if you think I am struggling dealing with it now, watch this little Queensland duck absolutely lose it in about six weeks’ time when she’s chipping ice off her windshield with her numberplate in the pitch dark) so our intrepid photographers and visual artists are having to find their own flame notes.There is no budget tree this year (even though winter has arrived ALREADY despite only just being April and if you think I am struggling dealing with it now, watch this little Queensland duck absolutely lose it in about six weeks’ time when she’s chipping ice off her windshield with her numberplate in the pitch dark) so our intrepid photographers and visual artists are having to find their own flame notes.
Mike Bowers found this one:Mike Bowers found this one:
A Gang Gang (I think) tucks into berries on the trees at Parliament House #auspol @AmyRemeikis @GuardianAus #parrotslive pic.twitter.com/40HhHKgg1YA Gang Gang (I think) tucks into berries on the trees at Parliament House #auspol @AmyRemeikis @GuardianAus #parrotslive pic.twitter.com/40HhHKgg1Y
The Nationals have found another “big stick”.The Nationals have found another “big stick”.
Probably because the last big stick suffered from a little bit of deflation and ended up being less of a big stick and more of a modestly sized toothpick. (That was the threat to break up electricity companies.)Probably because the last big stick suffered from a little bit of deflation and ended up being less of a big stick and more of a modestly sized toothpick. (That was the threat to break up electricity companies.)
David Littleproud is not ready to let go of big sticks just yet though. So he has come up with this (from his statement) – warning, it includes an offer of flowers:David Littleproud is not ready to let go of big sticks just yet though. So he has come up with this (from his statement) – warning, it includes an offer of flowers:
Labor’s new land-clearing laws are a big stick to bash farmers when they should be rewarded for the biodiversity on their properties, minister for agriculture David Littleproud said today.Labor’s new land-clearing laws are a big stick to bash farmers when they should be rewarded for the biodiversity on their properties, minister for agriculture David Littleproud said today.
Labor has announced it will extend Queensland-style land-clearing laws all over the country. The laws punish farmers for managing vegetation rather than rewarding them for the vegetation on their land.Labor has announced it will extend Queensland-style land-clearing laws all over the country. The laws punish farmers for managing vegetation rather than rewarding them for the vegetation on their land.
Queensland farmers have staged huge protests, given they are having large parts of their properties made unproductive without any compensation or financial reward.Queensland farmers have staged huge protests, given they are having large parts of their properties made unproductive without any compensation or financial reward.
‘Labor needs to come clean on what carbon gain it has modelled from banning vegetation management nationwide,’ Minister Littleproud said.‘Labor needs to come clean on what carbon gain it has modelled from banning vegetation management nationwide,’ Minister Littleproud said.
‘If Labor is getting carbon gains from stopping farmers making money on part of their farms then it should pay compensation. Labor should not take something from our farmers for nothing. If farmers are doing the heavy lifting for Labor’s carbon target, they deserve to be paid.‘If Labor is getting carbon gains from stopping farmers making money on part of their farms then it should pay compensation. Labor should not take something from our farmers for nothing. If farmers are doing the heavy lifting for Labor’s carbon target, they deserve to be paid.
‘Taking away part of a business’s assets and offering nothing in return is wrong. Labor has no right to declare farmers can’t use a big part of their farms without compensation.‘Taking away part of a business’s assets and offering nothing in return is wrong. Labor has no right to declare farmers can’t use a big part of their farms without compensation.
‘Labor wants to bash farmers with a big stick but I want to give them a bouquet.’‘Labor wants to bash farmers with a big stick but I want to give them a bouquet.’
There is just so much wrong with that line, I am honestly at a loss of where to start.There is just so much wrong with that line, I am honestly at a loss of where to start.
Sigh.Sigh.
Someone spent a lot of time coming up with this line, and it probably got an uptick in their group chat, so here you go:Someone spent a lot of time coming up with this line, and it probably got an uptick in their group chat, so here you go:
What we’ve got here is a re-Rudd of failed policy that cost jobs, that costs businesses, that will cost Australians at least $9,000 a year with the reckless targets that Bill Shorten will make law.What we’ve got here is a re-Rudd of failed policy that cost jobs, that costs businesses, that will cost Australians at least $9,000 a year with the reckless targets that Bill Shorten will make law.
That’s another way Scott Morrison is leading this attack. “Re-Rudd”.That’s another way Scott Morrison is leading this attack. “Re-Rudd”.
I know Bill Shorten is going to come up with equally ridiculous lines because that is how we do politics in Australia – but please, someone, for the love of Rhianna, just fire me into the sun already and get it over with.I know Bill Shorten is going to come up with equally ridiculous lines because that is how we do politics in Australia – but please, someone, for the love of Rhianna, just fire me into the sun already and get it over with.
Scott Morrison finishes his press conference with an attack on the Greens, which in this political climate is an attack on Labor:Scott Morrison finishes his press conference with an attack on the Greens, which in this political climate is an attack on Labor:
Now, the Labor party have got to apply their own rule to their own decisions. If they want to have this rule, which says minor parties should be considered separate to the mainstream parties, well it seems that the Labor party doesn’t think the Greens have these extreme views.Now, the Labor party have got to apply their own rule to their own decisions. If they want to have this rule, which says minor parties should be considered separate to the mainstream parties, well it seems that the Labor party doesn’t think the Greens have these extreme views.
They’ve got to apply the same ruler to themselves. We’ve made our decisions on this. The challenge is on Labor now. Are you for national security? Are you for the US alliance? Are you for border protection? Are you against death taxes? If that’s your view, if you’re for all of those things, then by all means put the Greens ahead of the Liberal party. But if you’re not, then you shouldn’t do that.They’ve got to apply the same ruler to themselves. We’ve made our decisions on this. The challenge is on Labor now. Are you for national security? Are you for the US alliance? Are you for border protection? Are you against death taxes? If that’s your view, if you’re for all of those things, then by all means put the Greens ahead of the Liberal party. But if you’re not, then you shouldn’t do that.
We now need to change the national anthem. We are no longer girt by sea, apparently, because – Labor.We now need to change the national anthem. We are no longer girt by sea, apparently, because – Labor.
Scott Morrison:Scott Morrison:
The only difference, when it comes to the National Energy Guarantee in terms of what Labor are proposing, is this: the reliability energy guarantee, which was part of the Neg we brought forward at the time, that’s now happening.The only difference, when it comes to the National Energy Guarantee in terms of what Labor are proposing, is this: the reliability energy guarantee, which was part of the Neg we brought forward at the time, that’s now happening.
That’s the important part. The bit Labor are applying to that is legislating a 45% emissions reduction target. That’s what Labor are doing. They are going to legislate that. That’s not going to reduce power prices. Labor’s Neg actually put prices not down, because they are going to legislate a reckless target that will hit wages, that will hit jobs, that will hit production.That’s the important part. The bit Labor are applying to that is legislating a 45% emissions reduction target. That’s what Labor are doing. They are going to legislate that. That’s not going to reduce power prices. Labor’s Neg actually put prices not down, because they are going to legislate a reckless target that will hit wages, that will hit jobs, that will hit production.
Let’s not forget what they’ve announced today is the extension, effectively, of the native veg laws in Queensland from Queensland Labor, which is basically going to land-lock the country and tell farmers and graziers and pastoralists around the country what they can do, or rather what they cannot do, on their own land.Let’s not forget what they’ve announced today is the extension, effectively, of the native veg laws in Queensland from Queensland Labor, which is basically going to land-lock the country and tell farmers and graziers and pastoralists around the country what they can do, or rather what they cannot do, on their own land.
This is a massive tax on agricultural Australia. It’s a massive tax on jobs. It’s $35 billion that Australian companies are going to have to spend, sending money offshore to foreign carbon traders, carbon credits for Kazakhstan. This is what this is for.This is a massive tax on agricultural Australia. It’s a massive tax on jobs. It’s $35 billion that Australian companies are going to have to spend, sending money offshore to foreign carbon traders, carbon credits for Kazakhstan. This is what this is for.
Say it with me now: a talking point does not make it true.Say it with me now: a talking point does not make it true.
Scott Morrison on Labor’s climate policy:Scott Morrison on Labor’s climate policy:
Bill Shorten does not have a plan, he just has another tax. That’s all this is. Bill Shorten does not have a plan, he just has a tax.Bill Shorten does not have a plan, he just has another tax. That’s all this is. Bill Shorten does not have a plan, he just has a tax.
And then there is this absolute pearl of wisdom:And then there is this absolute pearl of wisdom:
“You make the point about electric vehicles. Well, the government is already taking a number of steps to support the growth in electric vehicles.“You make the point about electric vehicles. Well, the government is already taking a number of steps to support the growth in electric vehicles.
“I mean, if you buy an electric vehicle, one of the things you don’t pay is fuel excise. That is already a major advantage for those buying electric vehicles, a big significant leg-up.”“I mean, if you buy an electric vehicle, one of the things you don’t pay is fuel excise. That is already a major advantage for those buying electric vehicles, a big significant leg-up.”
Could that be ... because they are electric?Could that be ... because they are electric?
Actually no, I need to correct that. This election campaign is going to be a very long century.Actually no, I need to correct that. This election campaign is going to be a very long century.
Scott Morrison:Scott Morrison:
“That’s why we’ll be handing down a budget surplus tomorrow night, the first in 12 years. It’s been about keeping expenditure under control and it’s been about supporting the growth in the Australian economy and getting Australians off welfare and into work.“That’s why we’ll be handing down a budget surplus tomorrow night, the first in 12 years. It’s been about keeping expenditure under control and it’s been about supporting the growth in the Australian economy and getting Australians off welfare and into work.
It’s the classic 12-point turnaround. That works in AFL and NRL. You stop one team scoring down one end and you score on the other.It’s the classic 12-point turnaround. That works in AFL and NRL. You stop one team scoring down one end and you score on the other.
“People receiving welfare under our government are now paying tax because they have jobs. That’s how you balance a budget.“People receiving welfare under our government are now paying tax because they have jobs. That’s how you balance a budget.
Scott Morrison just said “the PBS to me spells H.O.P.E”.
This election campaign is going to be a very long decade.
Andrew Leigh was asked about the government’s “carbon tax” (it’s not) criticism this morning while on Sky:
It’s not, and if it were, then their own policy would be a carbon tax. Kieran, this is simply an extension of a scheme put in place by Malcolm Turnbull. Business has told us that they are sick of the climate wars. They’re sick of the bickering over climate and they want bipartisanship.
Our view is the best way of achieving that is to extend the Turnbull government’s safeguard mechanism that applies to 0.01 % of companies, puts in place a pollution cap and is part of our commitment to seeing Australia meet our internationally agreed carbon targets. As you’ve said before, we’re also taking advice from business to improve the scheme by giving firms access to international credits.
Angus Taylor is also running the “it’s a carbon tax” line while attacking Labor’s climate policy on Sky.
Narrator: It’s not.
There is about to be so much more of this.
The Bill Shorten we know... pic.twitter.com/KJOvDWEJZ9
Labor will officially launch its climate policy at midday.
There has been a bit of talk that Scott Morrison could head to Government House as soon as the budget is handed down and deny Bill Shorten his budget-in-reply speech (which is usually done on the Thursday).
Back in November, when he announced the budget date, Morrison said this:
We’ll deal with the normal budget week in the way budgets are always handled. So yes, I would anticipate that the leader of the opposition would make his reply in the normal way.
Of course, Morrison is going to do whatever he believes is in the best interests of keeping the Coalition in power, so that could include a Wednesday trip down the road, but it is doubtful. Mostly because it would kickstart the election campaign with allegations of arrogance and bad sportsmanship, and I’m pretty sure those qualities don’t play so well in focus groups.
On why Labor announced its climate policy today – budget eve, and usually one of the days when, as we say in the biz, the trash gets taken out (the budget tends to cut down on scrutiny because, well, there is usually plenty to scrutinise in the budget papers, even in a unicorn budget like this) – Mark Butler had this to say:
This is about making sure, as we lead into the election, climate change is a particular focus of the campaign, and recognising that five or six years of vandalism on climate change policy cannot continue. It is simply an abrogation of the responsibility we have to our children, our grandchildren, and those beyond.
The Greens are not impressed with Labor’s climate policy, with Adam Bandt calling it a “dog’s breakfast”.
“There are a couple of good ideas here, but overall this is a dog’s breakfast of Liberal party leftovers, with no plan for coal and no hope of meeting the Paris agreement goals,” Brandt said in a statement.
“Coal is the single biggest contributor to climate change. If you don’t have a plan for coal, you’re not serious about climate change.”
You’ll find some of the Greens’ complaints below:
Safeguards:
“The Neg and so-called ‘safeguards’ were created by the climate change-denying Liberal party and should be put in the bin, not reheated by Labor and served up as a climate policy.”
“By adopting the ineffective safeguard mechanism with huge carve-outs for some sectors, it looks like the free ride for big business in this country on climate will continue under Bill Shorten.
International offsets:
“Labor has also confirmed it will adopt a dodgy accounting trick that even Tony Abbott opposes by allowing business to use international offsets.”
“International offsets delay climate action in Australia. More coal will be burnt at home and the transition to 100% renewables will be delayed.”
Electric cars:
“Not only does the target lack ambition, but the policy lacks mechanisms that would get us even close to 50% electric vehicles by 2030,” said Senator Janet Rice, Australian Greens transport and infrastructure spokesperson.
“Labor’s EV announcement is nothing but an attempt to grab some headlines on climate change without any actual substance.”
Doesn’t this just sound like an absolute par-tay!
Deputy prime minister and Nationals leader Michael McCormack and minister for urban infrastructure Alan Tudge will discuss the Liberal and National government’s investment in infrastructure.
That’ll be happening at 10.30am.
I am just not sure we can handle that much charisma this early on a Monday morning.
We also have Mathias Cormann once again uttering the words “carbon tax”, this time to ABC radio:
Labor talks a lot, but what they have put out would harm the economy, would harm families, would cost jobs, would drive up unemployment and, indeed, Labor would bring back a carbon tax, they would force people across Australia to pay tens of billions of dollars in higher taxes, only for them to send that money overseas to pay for international carbon credits.
... You seem to be deliberately ignoring the fact that Labor have confirmed that they want to send money overseas to buy international carbon permits. That means that they will be imposing tens of billions of dollars in higher taxes on Australians, which should remain either in Australians’ pockets, so they can spend it here on Australia ... or should be available to government to invest on essential services here in Australia.
If Labor wants to buy international carbon permits, as they have said they would, they will have to increase the tax burden on Australians ... and that clearly is going back to the carbon tax, the discredited carbon tax arrangements of past Labor governments.
He, of course, was attacking Labor’s climate policy.
But this time around we have the admission from Tony Abbott’s former chief of staff Peta Credlin, who in early 2017 told Sky News this about the last time the Coalition used the carbon tax attack line:
Along comes a carbon tax. It wasn’t a carbon tax, as you know. It was many other things in nomenclature terms but we made it a carbon tax. We made it a fight about the hip pocket and not about the environment. That was brutal retail politics and it took Abbott about six months to cut through and when he cut through, Gillard was gone.
Mark Butler, also speaking to Fran Kelly, responded just a few minutes after Cormann:
What rubbish. Maybe he should go and talk to every single big business, including all of the businesses in his own state of Western Australia that cannot understand why a supposedly pro-market party has an objection to businesses trading in international carbon markets.
We allow business to trade in every other robust international market – why on earth would we not allow them to trade in international carbon markets? Provided of course that they are robust and they are credible, which is Labor’s position – and it is also the position of the Australian business community.