This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/mar/31/anger-whitehall-brexit-strife-delays-key-policies-legislation

The article has changed 22 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Anger in Whitehall as Brexit strife delays key policies and legislation Anger in Whitehall as Brexit strife delays key policies and legislation
(1 day later)
Brexit is delaying key pieces of policy and legislation, angering ministers and officials, amid reports of paralysis across Whitehall as the government focuses on solving the current crisis, the Guardian has learned.Brexit is delaying key pieces of policy and legislation, angering ministers and officials, amid reports of paralysis across Whitehall as the government focuses on solving the current crisis, the Guardian has learned.
Legislation meant to limit the prosecution of soldiers, create an online regulator and curb drug dispensing errors has been held up or postponed as the government tries to gain enough support for a deal to leave the EU.Legislation meant to limit the prosecution of soldiers, create an online regulator and curb drug dispensing errors has been held up or postponed as the government tries to gain enough support for a deal to leave the EU.
It comes as Whitehall departments divert senior staff to work on Brexit-related matters in case the UK leaves the EU without a deal.It comes as Whitehall departments divert senior staff to work on Brexit-related matters in case the UK leaves the EU without a deal.
PM may have to accept soft Brexit if Commons backs it, says ministerPM may have to accept soft Brexit if Commons backs it, says minister
Plans to introduce legislation to stop the armed services from facing legal action for alleged crimes more than 10 years old have stalled because of chaos in Downing Street over Brexit, Whitehall sources have disclosed.Plans to introduce legislation to stop the armed services from facing legal action for alleged crimes more than 10 years old have stalled because of chaos in Downing Street over Brexit, Whitehall sources have disclosed.
Gavin Williamson, the defence secretary, was expected to bring forward the proposed legislation in this year’s Queen’s speech after the government faced pressure to address the legacy of the Troubles in Northern Ireland.Gavin Williamson, the defence secretary, was expected to bring forward the proposed legislation in this year’s Queen’s speech after the government faced pressure to address the legacy of the Troubles in Northern Ireland.
The measures being proposed included a statutory presumption against prosecution, meaning veterans would not face prosecution if the alleged offence took place more than 10 years ago.The measures being proposed included a statutory presumption against prosecution, meaning veterans would not face prosecution if the alleged offence took place more than 10 years ago.
Theresa May will present whatever deal she has reached with Jeremy Corbyn and parliament to the European Council, or ask for a lengthy extension. While she is not in favour of the extension, parliament is in the process of legislating to rule out no deal. Having asked for a further Article 50 extension until 30 June, Theresa May will present whatever deal or plan she has reached with Jeremy Corbyn and parliament to the European Council. EU leaders would decide how long any further extension might run, but there is no guarantee the EU27 would unanimously agree.
If the UK parliament or government have significantly changed position, then a lengthy Article 50 extension may be required. EU leaders would decide how long, but there's no guarantee the EU27 would unanimously agree to this. With no other significant developments, this would still be the date that the UK leaves the EU by international law. However, Yvette Coooper's bill in parliament is attempting to legislate to rule this out.
If Theresa May's deal is not passed by parliament, then, with no other significant developments, this would be the date by international law that the UK leaves the EU without a deal. However she appears to have ruled out allowing this to happen. The EU27 will vote for a new set of MEPs without the UK participating. However, if Brexit has been delayed beyond Theresa May's new proposed date of 30 June, then the UK could still hold European elections on Thursday 23 May.
If Theresa May's new proposal does pass parliament and is approved by the European Council, then this could be the scheduled date of the UK's departure from the EU. If Theresa May's new proposal does pass parliament, and is approved by the European Council, then this could be the new scheduled date of the UK's departure from the EU. Crucially it is before the new European parliament sits, meaning the UK would not have had to participate in the elections.
Unless there is a further longer extension of article 50, the EU27 will vote for a new set of MEPs without the UK participating. However, if Brexit has been further delayed, the UK would hold European elections on the Thursday. Theresa May is expected to stand down after the UK leaves the EU on whatever date, having agreed that somebody else should lead the next phase of negotiations. This will trigger a Conservative leadership election. There has been some suggestion that she might hold out through the summer so that the contest takes place after the next Tory conference in October.
If Theresa May's deal passes parliament, she is expected to stand down after the UK leaves the EU on 22 May, triggering a contest for the leadership of the Conservative party. There has been some suggestion though that she might hold out through the summer so that the contest takes place after the next Tory conference in October. Donald Tusk has proposed a flexible extension, allowing the UK to leave the EU at some point before a cut-off date of 10 April 2020, at the point where the UK parliament can ratify an orderly departure. 
However, sources said the proposals had been hampered because ministers were failing to engage amid the pressures of Brexit.However, sources said the proposals had been hampered because ministers were failing to engage amid the pressures of Brexit.
“The legislation was benign and had been discussed between the Ministry of Defence, the Northern Ireland Office and the attorney general’s office. But it has been delayed, with no official sign off, in part because of a lack of leadership. The problem is No 10,” the source said.“The legislation was benign and had been discussed between the Ministry of Defence, the Northern Ireland Office and the attorney general’s office. But it has been delayed, with no official sign off, in part because of a lack of leadership. The problem is No 10,” the source said.
Asked to comment on the delay, a government spokesperson said it had established a dedicated team to examine all the options to increase legal protections for the armed services.Asked to comment on the delay, a government spokesperson said it had established a dedicated team to examine all the options to increase legal protections for the armed services.
“The team is working with colleagues across government to find the best way forward and that work is ongoing,” a statement said.“The team is working with colleagues across government to find the best way forward and that work is ongoing,” a statement said.
A white paper on online harms that set out new laws to improve internet safety has also been delayed, insiders said.A white paper on online harms that set out new laws to improve internet safety has also been delayed, insiders said.
The policy document, drawn up by the the Home Office and the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, was supposed to be published last week and was expected to impose huge fines on tech platforms and their executives.The policy document, drawn up by the the Home Office and the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, was supposed to be published last week and was expected to impose huge fines on tech platforms and their executives.
Whitehall sources said the government had been holding it back for several reasons including difficulties finding “appropriate legal advice” due to Brexit. The white paper has been criticised by the Society of Editors for introducing “press regulation by the back door”.Whitehall sources said the government had been holding it back for several reasons including difficulties finding “appropriate legal advice” due to Brexit. The white paper has been criticised by the Society of Editors for introducing “press regulation by the back door”.
A government spokesperson said the white paper would be published shortly and would set out the responsibilities of online platforms, how these responsibilities should be met and what would happen if they were not.A government spokesperson said the white paper would be published shortly and would set out the responsibilities of online platforms, how these responsibilities should be met and what would happen if they were not.
Steve Brine, who resigned as health minister last week to vote against Theresa May’s Brexit deal, earlier wrote that a focus on Brexit legislation meant parliament had been unable to consider new legislation on pharmaceutical dispensing errors.Steve Brine, who resigned as health minister last week to vote against Theresa May’s Brexit deal, earlier wrote that a focus on Brexit legislation meant parliament had been unable to consider new legislation on pharmaceutical dispensing errors.
In a letter to the MP Kevin Barron, he said parliamentary time and government legal departments were focused on legislation relating to the UK’s departure from the EU, and consequently proposed amendments to the draft legislation had not been considered “as quickly as hoped”.In a letter to the MP Kevin Barron, he said parliamentary time and government legal departments were focused on legislation relating to the UK’s departure from the EU, and consequently proposed amendments to the draft legislation had not been considered “as quickly as hoped”.
It emerged on Saturday that two-thirds of staff employed directly by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) are working on delivering Brexit, according to official government figures.It emerged on Saturday that two-thirds of staff employed directly by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) are working on delivering Brexit, according to official government figures.
As the possibility of a no-deal Brexit has increased, civil servants have spent more time and public money on possible scenarios that may never be needed, with £4bn of taxpayers’ money earmarked for no-deal planning since 2016.As the possibility of a no-deal Brexit has increased, civil servants have spent more time and public money on possible scenarios that may never be needed, with £4bn of taxpayers’ money earmarked for no-deal planning since 2016.
Agencies and departments are meant to be reprioritising work or stopping tasks to accommodate this change – but for the most part ministers are not being clear about which policies they are happy to drop.Agencies and departments are meant to be reprioritising work or stopping tasks to accommodate this change – but for the most part ministers are not being clear about which policies they are happy to drop.
Sources told the Guardian the Department for Education and the Ministry of Justice had put some policies on hold but not officially announced which ones.Sources told the Guardian the Department for Education and the Ministry of Justice had put some policies on hold but not officially announced which ones.
BrexitBrexit
Article 50Article 50
European UnionEuropean Union
Foreign policyForeign policy
Civil serviceCivil service
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content