This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47740158

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Brexit: MPs asked to vote on withdrawal agreement only Brexit: MPs asked to vote on withdrawal agreement only
(32 minutes later)
MPs will be asked to vote again on Brexit on Friday but only on part of the deal negotiated with the EU.MPs will be asked to vote again on Brexit on Friday but only on part of the deal negotiated with the EU.
They will vote on the withdrawal agreement - covering the "divorce bill", citizens' rights and the controversial Irish "backstop". They will vote on the withdrawal agreement on the Irish "backstop", divorce bill and citizens' rights.
But the political declaration covering the UK's future relationship with the EU will not be put to the vote. But it will not amount to a third "meaningful vote" on the deal, as it will not include a vote on the UK's future relationship with the EU.
Amid anger from MPs, Andrea Leadsom said it was "crucial" if the UK wanted to secure a Brexit delay until 22 May.Amid anger from MPs, Andrea Leadsom said it was "crucial" if the UK wanted to secure a Brexit delay until 22 May.
"If we don't agree the Withdrawal Agreement tomorrow then we will not, so that leaves in doubt the future for the arrangements with the European Council," she said."If we don't agree the Withdrawal Agreement tomorrow then we will not, so that leaves in doubt the future for the arrangements with the European Council," she said.
BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg said Theresa May was essentially asking MPs to turn it into a game of two halves - just voting on the first part of the deal which sorts out the UK's departure and leaving the longer term part for the next few weeks.
But it is still not certain it will get through - both Labour and the Democratic Unionist Party say they will vote against the withdrawal agreement on Friday.
Commons Speaker John Bercow said the government's "new" motion and complied with his ruling that he would not allow a third "meaningful vote" on "substantially the same" motion as MPs have already rejected by historic margins twice.
The PM's deal includes a withdrawal agreement - setting out how much money the UK must pay to the EU as a settlement, details of the transition period, and the backstop arrangements - and a political declaration on the way the future EU-UK relationship will work.The PM's deal includes a withdrawal agreement - setting out how much money the UK must pay to the EU as a settlement, details of the transition period, and the backstop arrangements - and a political declaration on the way the future EU-UK relationship will work.
The vote would not allow Parliament to ratify the withdrawal package, because Brexit legislation allows this only after the passage of a "meaningful vote" on both the Withdrawal Agreement and a Political Declaration on the future relationship. If MPs approve the withdrawal agreement on Friday, they will have met the requirements laid down by the European Council if they are to push exit day back to 22 May.
And some MPs questioned its legality, with Labour's Valerie Vaz saying "on the face of it breaks the law". But under current law, it would not be enough to ratify the deal because only one part would be approved.
"This is no way to run a government," she told MPs. The government would either have to pass part two of the deal - the political declaration on the future relationship - at a later date, or change the law so that it is not needed to ratify the treaty.
Commons Speaker John Bercow said it was a "new" motion and complied with his ruling that he would not allow a third "meaningful vote" on "substantially the same" motion as MPs had already rejected by historic margins twice. Last week the European Council agreed to postpone Brexit beyond the expected date of 29 March - offering an extension until 22 May, if MPs approved the withdrawal agreement by the end of this week.
Commons Leader Mrs Leadsom told MPs that the European Council would only agree to extend Article 50 - delaying Brexit - until 22 May if MPs approved the withdrawal agreement by 2300 GMT on Friday. If not, it offered a shorter delay until 12 April - the date by which the UK would have to indicate whether it would stand candidates in the 2019 European Parliament elections - allowing the UK time to get the deal through or to "indicate a way forward".
Commons Leader Mrs Leadsom told MPs on Friday that the European Council would only agree to extend Article 50 until 22 May if MPs approved the withdrawal agreement by 23:00 GMT on Friday.
"It's crucial therefore that we make every effort to give effect to the Council's decision and tomorrow's motion gives Parliament the opportunity to secure that extension," she said."It's crucial therefore that we make every effort to give effect to the Council's decision and tomorrow's motion gives Parliament the opportunity to secure that extension," she said.
"I think we can all agree that we don't want to be in the situation of asking for another extension and facing the potential requirement of participating in European Parliament elections.""I think we can all agree that we don't want to be in the situation of asking for another extension and facing the potential requirement of participating in European Parliament elections."
But she faced anger from MPs. Labour's Mary Creagh described it as an "extraordinary and unprecedented reverse ferret of the commitments that have been made..that we should have our say on both items together".But she faced anger from MPs. Labour's Mary Creagh described it as an "extraordinary and unprecedented reverse ferret of the commitments that have been made..that we should have our say on both items together".
Her fellow Labour MP Stephen Doughty described it as "trickery of the highest order". Friday's vote would not allow Parliament to ratify the withdrawal package, because Brexit legislation allows this only after the passage of a "meaningful vote" on both the Withdrawal Agreement and a Political Declaration on the future relationship.
And some MPs questioned its legality, with Labour's Valerie Vaz saying "on the face of it breaks the law".
"This is no way to run a government," she told MPs.
And the Labour chairman of the Brexit select committee, Hilary Benn, asked if Brexit was delayed to 22 May whether at that point it would "no longer be possible" to apply for a further extension after that - because it would be too late to take part in the European Parliamentary elections.
Attorney General Geoffrey Cox said he would address this point on Friday.