This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7721231.stm

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Teenage girl wins right to die Seriously ill girl allowed to die
(about 4 hours later)
A terminally-ill girl has won the right to die after a hospital ended its bid to force her to have a heart operation. A terminally ill girl has won the right to refuse treatment after a hospital ended its bid to force her to have a heart transplant.
Herefordshire Primary Care Trust dropped a High Court case after a child protection officer said Hannah Jones was adamant she did not want surgery.Herefordshire Primary Care Trust dropped a High Court case after a child protection officer said Hannah Jones was adamant she did not want surgery.
Hannah, 13, of Marden, near Hereford, has refused a heart transplant because it might not work and, if it did, would be followed by constant medication. Hannah, 13, of Marden, near Hereford, said she wanted to die with dignity.
The girl, who has a hole in her heart, says she wants to die with dignity. She said the operation might not work, and if it did work, it would be followed by constant medication.
Hannah was interviewed by the child protection officer after the trust applied for a court order in February to force the transplant. Hannah, who has a hole in her heart, was interviewed by the child protection officer after the trust applied for a court order in February to force the transplant.
Parents 'proud'
She said she wanted to stop treatment and spend the rest of her life at home.She said she wanted to stop treatment and spend the rest of her life at home.
The BBC's Jane Deith, who has followed Hannah's legal battle, said: "Hannah managed to convince this officer that this was a decision she had made on her own and she had thought about it over a long period of time, and eventually the court proceeding was dropped."The BBC's Jane Deith, who has followed Hannah's legal battle, said: "Hannah managed to convince this officer that this was a decision she had made on her own and she had thought about it over a long period of time, and eventually the court proceeding was dropped."
Parents 'proud' FROM THE TODAY PROGRAMME class="" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/default.stm">More from Today programme
Our reporter said that the girl's parents supported her decision and were "very proud of her".Our reporter said that the girl's parents supported her decision and were "very proud of her".
"She didn't take the decision lightly, and she had chosen that she wanted to live and die in dignity at home with her parents.""She didn't take the decision lightly, and she had chosen that she wanted to live and die in dignity at home with her parents."
The Daily Telegraph quoted Hannah's father Andrew, 43, as saying: "It is outrageous that the people from the hospital could presume we didn't have our daughter's best interests at heart.The Daily Telegraph quoted Hannah's father Andrew, 43, as saying: "It is outrageous that the people from the hospital could presume we didn't have our daughter's best interests at heart.
"Hannah had been through enough already and to have the added stress of a possible court hearing or being forcibly taken into hospital is disgraceful.""Hannah had been through enough already and to have the added stress of a possible court hearing or being forcibly taken into hospital is disgraceful."
Hannah previously suffered from leukaemia and her heart has been weakened by drugs she was required to take from the age of five.Hannah previously suffered from leukaemia and her heart has been weakened by drugs she was required to take from the age of five.
Holiday cancelled
Last week her father was forced to cancel plans to take her to Disneyland because he could not get insurance for her.
The family had been given the holiday to the US by the charity Cauldwell Children.
Dr Tony Calland, chairman of the British Medical Association's ethics committee, said a child of Hannah's age was able to make an informed decision to refuse treatment.
He said the House of Lords had ruled in the 1980s that a child who understood the issues and consequences could be considered legally competent.
It followed the case of Victoria Gillick who took her health authority to court claiming she should be informed if her daughters were prescribed contraception.
Hannah's parents reportedly said they believed a locum GP raised concerns over Hannah with the child protection team.
Dr Calland said he understood why a doctor might have taken this action.
He said: "I think some doctors take the view that they must intervene and they are making that decision in what they see as the best interests of the patient.
"But of course best interests of patients is not just the best medical interests - it's the overall holistic interests of the person in general.
"I think in this particular case it's obvious that the parents and the child had made a perfectly reasonable decision and the doctor obviously came to a different view and was trying to use the law to support his view.
"I think obviously a child of 13 with these circumstances should be perfectly capable of making the decision and particularly when supported by the parents.
"But of course there have been cases where parents have successfully supported the child and that is not in the best interests of the child."


Have you been affected by issues raised in this story?Have you been affected by issues raised in this story?
Send your comments using the post form below, or text 61124.Send your comments using the post form below, or text 61124.
In most cases a selection of your comments will be published, displaying your name and location unless you state otherwise in the box below.In most cases a selection of your comments will be published, displaying your name and location unless you state otherwise in the box below.
Name
Name