This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/20/us/politics/on-politics-progressive-groups.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
On Politics With Lisa Lerer: Is This the Future of the Left? A Chat With Progressive Leaders About the Future of the Left
(about 2 hours later)
Hi. Welcome to On Politics, your guide to the day in national politics. I’m Lisa Lerer, your host.Hi. Welcome to On Politics, your guide to the day in national politics. I’m Lisa Lerer, your host.
[Get On Politics delivered to your inbox.]
During the Trump era, Democrats have largely been able to avoid making tough choices. With little power, their most pressing question has been whether to object to everything the president does or just, you know, most things.During the Trump era, Democrats have largely been able to avoid making tough choices. With little power, their most pressing question has been whether to object to everything the president does or just, you know, most things.
That all ends in two weeks.That all ends in two weeks.
When they take over control of the House in January, Democrats will gain real legislative and investigative power — and will carry the burden of making decisions. And the three dozen Democrats flirting with a presidential run will quickly have to decide whether to actually take the plunge.When they take over control of the House in January, Democrats will gain real legislative and investigative power — and will carry the burden of making decisions. And the three dozen Democrats flirting with a presidential run will quickly have to decide whether to actually take the plunge.
With all of those decisions over the next year, there’s sure to be a robust debate about what the future of the Democratic Party looks like. A big part of that discussion will center on the progressive wing — what they want, what they believe and how they’re shaping the presidential race.With all of those decisions over the next year, there’s sure to be a robust debate about what the future of the Democratic Party looks like. A big part of that discussion will center on the progressive wing — what they want, what they believe and how they’re shaping the presidential race.
We were curious what the conversation inside that progressive wing sounds like. So we spoke to three people who have recently taken the helm of some of the country’s biggest liberal groups: Nina Turner of Our Revolution, Maurice Mitchell of the Working Families Party and Yvette Simpson of Democracy for America.We were curious what the conversation inside that progressive wing sounds like. So we spoke to three people who have recently taken the helm of some of the country’s biggest liberal groups: Nina Turner of Our Revolution, Maurice Mitchell of the Working Families Party and Yvette Simpson of Democracy for America.
It was an expansive, 45-minute conversation, which we had to condense quite a bit for the newsletter. Here’s what they had to say about their new roles, 2020 and how progressivism is changing.It was an expansive, 45-minute conversation, which we had to condense quite a bit for the newsletter. Here’s what they had to say about their new roles, 2020 and how progressivism is changing.
LISA: So you three are all relatively new in your jobs. Nina, you took the helm at Our Revolution about 18 months ago. Maurice, you started as the director of the Working Families Party in April. And Yvette, you’ll become the CEO of Democracy for America next year.LISA: So you three are all relatively new in your jobs. Nina, you took the helm at Our Revolution about 18 months ago. Maurice, you started as the director of the Working Families Party in April. And Yvette, you’ll become the CEO of Democracy for America next year.
What do your appointments say about the state of the progressive movement?What do your appointments say about the state of the progressive movement?
NINA TURNER: One of the top goals of this movement is first recognizing that it is a truly multiracial movement. A lot of times when people see the faces of the “progressive movement” they tend to think that the movement is very white, but the movement is really, you know, to borrow from Reverend Jesse Jackson, the “rainbow coalition.” To have at this moment in history three very dynamic African-American leaders leading organizations in the progressive movement, just our very presence is a symbol.NINA TURNER: One of the top goals of this movement is first recognizing that it is a truly multiracial movement. A lot of times when people see the faces of the “progressive movement” they tend to think that the movement is very white, but the movement is really, you know, to borrow from Reverend Jesse Jackson, the “rainbow coalition.” To have at this moment in history three very dynamic African-American leaders leading organizations in the progressive movement, just our very presence is a symbol.
MAURICE MITCHELL: What I would also add is that this movement is not about one election. I think a role for our movement is expanding people’s understanding of what democracy is and making sure that they see themselves in it. This idea that Bernie (Sanders) said — in fact both Bernie and Trump said — that the system is rigged, right? So in order to un-rig the system, we need a new type of politics that confronts the systemic challenges and is willing to do big things. We don’t want to play small ball.MAURICE MITCHELL: What I would also add is that this movement is not about one election. I think a role for our movement is expanding people’s understanding of what democracy is and making sure that they see themselves in it. This idea that Bernie (Sanders) said — in fact both Bernie and Trump said — that the system is rigged, right? So in order to un-rig the system, we need a new type of politics that confronts the systemic challenges and is willing to do big things. We don’t want to play small ball.
YVETTE SIMPSON: The shift for our organizations hopefully will be a rallying cry for what we should see in the Democratic establishment. We want to see people of color represented not just at the bottom, but we expect to see those individuals in leadership. And then when you do that, not only do you get average results, but you get even better results.YVETTE SIMPSON: The shift for our organizations hopefully will be a rallying cry for what we should see in the Democratic establishment. We want to see people of color represented not just at the bottom, but we expect to see those individuals in leadership. And then when you do that, not only do you get average results, but you get even better results.
It’s the idea that when brown and black people lead us, we not only take care of brown and black people, we take care of all the people.It’s the idea that when brown and black people lead us, we not only take care of brown and black people, we take care of all the people.
You all mentioned that there’s this perception that “progressive” means white. Why do you think that has persisted?You all mentioned that there’s this perception that “progressive” means white. Why do you think that has persisted?
MM: It’s a historical inaccuracy. Our presence at the helm of these organizations is a corrective one because black folks have always played this critical role. But I think the reality is black folks haven’t always been in leadership.MM: It’s a historical inaccuracy. Our presence at the helm of these organizations is a corrective one because black folks have always played this critical role. But I think the reality is black folks haven’t always been in leadership.
If you look at a traditional Democratic Party, unfortunately, black folks and the issues of black folks haven’t always been front and center, even though our vote and our movements and our strategies have been utilized in order to get elected. But I feel like this is a political realignment that we’re experiencing, where black leadership is central.If you look at a traditional Democratic Party, unfortunately, black folks and the issues of black folks haven’t always been front and center, even though our vote and our movements and our strategies have been utilized in order to get elected. But I feel like this is a political realignment that we’re experiencing, where black leadership is central.
YS: The face of the progressive movement, in my experience, has been very white, and I think that was less the reality and more maybe what was put out front. People most associated that with white, traditionally, maybe more male.YS: The face of the progressive movement, in my experience, has been very white, and I think that was less the reality and more maybe what was put out front. People most associated that with white, traditionally, maybe more male.
But what Maurice is saying, and what Nina said, is that is just not true.But what Maurice is saying, and what Nina said, is that is just not true.
NT: I’m amen-ing everything that my sister and my brother said. You know, there is a saying that said that if the hunter writes the story, then the lion’s story is never told. So that’s the same thing I feel about this movement. The lens by which it is written about leaves out so many people because the hunter — i.e. the neoliberal class, or the class of people that have the most power — they tell the story. It benefits folks to write that story in that way.NT: I’m amen-ing everything that my sister and my brother said. You know, there is a saying that said that if the hunter writes the story, then the lion’s story is never told. So that’s the same thing I feel about this movement. The lens by which it is written about leaves out so many people because the hunter — i.e. the neoliberal class, or the class of people that have the most power — they tell the story. It benefits folks to write that story in that way.
But I would argue that progressivism is by its very nature black, because you have to be progressive when you fight against the system that is treating you like a second-class citizen. Hopefully our very presence as the leaders of three very strong organizations says to the world, you need to tell the story differently. Now the lion is telling the story.But I would argue that progressivism is by its very nature black, because you have to be progressive when you fight against the system that is treating you like a second-class citizen. Hopefully our very presence as the leaders of three very strong organizations says to the world, you need to tell the story differently. Now the lion is telling the story.
We’re having a conversation that’s a lot about representation. And we could see a presidential field with multiple African-American candidates and multiple female candidates. What advice would you be giving those people?We’re having a conversation that’s a lot about representation. And we could see a presidential field with multiple African-American candidates and multiple female candidates. What advice would you be giving those people?
YS: Black women matter. We want to see candidates who are engaging with black women, with black people on the ground, making sure that those in these communities are not only heard but are front and center in the work that you plan to do, in your calculus as you think about how you’re going to navigate this country over the course of the campaign. We don’t want you just knocking on the door when you’re running.YS: Black women matter. We want to see candidates who are engaging with black women, with black people on the ground, making sure that those in these communities are not only heard but are front and center in the work that you plan to do, in your calculus as you think about how you’re going to navigate this country over the course of the campaign. We don’t want you just knocking on the door when you’re running.
Number two, this is the time to be bold and be unapologetic in your agenda. And we want to see that. People who have been on the bubble too long, they use words like bipartisanship. The person down on the ground could care less about how you would get along with the person next to you. They want to know whether you’re going make a change, if you’ve got to do that by hook or by crook, by any means necessary. They want to see change in their real lives.Number two, this is the time to be bold and be unapologetic in your agenda. And we want to see that. People who have been on the bubble too long, they use words like bipartisanship. The person down on the ground could care less about how you would get along with the person next to you. They want to know whether you’re going make a change, if you’ve got to do that by hook or by crook, by any means necessary. They want to see change in their real lives.
I was preaching there a little bit, Nina, did you see that?I was preaching there a little bit, Nina, did you see that?
NT: So it’s no secret, you know, if Bernie Sanders decides to run, who I will support. But amen to everything that Yvette just said. She’s absolutely right — the only people who talk in terms of who’s Republican and who’s Democrat are people here in this Beltway. But the average, everyday person in this country does not have that conversation when they’re talking about how to pay their bills. They’re not talking about those issues when they still have dirty water in Flint.NT: So it’s no secret, you know, if Bernie Sanders decides to run, who I will support. But amen to everything that Yvette just said. She’s absolutely right — the only people who talk in terms of who’s Republican and who’s Democrat are people here in this Beltway. But the average, everyday person in this country does not have that conversation when they’re talking about how to pay their bills. They’re not talking about those issues when they still have dirty water in Flint.
And in 2020 we have a pivotal opportunity to do some course-correction in the country and hopefully give people a real choice. And I’m going to say to Democrats not to equivocate at all who they are standing for, because we already know who the Republican president is standing for. So this 2020 opportunity, this is real in the field. It’s go time.And in 2020 we have a pivotal opportunity to do some course-correction in the country and hopefully give people a real choice. And I’m going to say to Democrats not to equivocate at all who they are standing for, because we already know who the Republican president is standing for. So this 2020 opportunity, this is real in the field. It’s go time.
MM: Man, I’m getting excited.MM: Man, I’m getting excited.
What I would say is we’re not going to fall for the “okie dokie,” in the sense that somebody could just signal through cultural signifiers and identity that they’re down with a particular set of politics or a movement. People have to show and prove, not just based on the fact that they might occupy a certain identity. We need to see it in their voting record, in the issues that they champion.What I would say is we’re not going to fall for the “okie dokie,” in the sense that somebody could just signal through cultural signifiers and identity that they’re down with a particular set of politics or a movement. People have to show and prove, not just based on the fact that they might occupy a certain identity. We need to see it in their voting record, in the issues that they champion.
It’s easy in the moment of the “resistance” to signal that you’re down with the resistance. But I’m less interested in what you’re against — I’m interested in what you’re for. The prerequisite for sanity in this country is to have an opposition to the Trump movement. What sways me is what you’re trying to build. Which side were you on previous to the moment that you decided to take the mantle?It’s easy in the moment of the “resistance” to signal that you’re down with the resistance. But I’m less interested in what you’re against — I’m interested in what you’re for. The prerequisite for sanity in this country is to have an opposition to the Trump movement. What sways me is what you’re trying to build. Which side were you on previous to the moment that you decided to take the mantle?
NT: Can I just say, amen. I’m sorry Lisa, I am shouting across the office right now because my sister and my brother just put ten thousand exclamation points. We will be rolling the tape.NT: Can I just say, amen. I’m sorry Lisa, I am shouting across the office right now because my sister and my brother just put ten thousand exclamation points. We will be rolling the tape.
[Sign up here to get On Politics in your inbox.]
________________________________________
A note to On Politics readers: It’s beginning to look a lot like Christmas. (And a lot like vacation.) We’re taking off for the holidays. Best wishes for everything merry and bright. We’ll see you in 2019!A note to On Politics readers: It’s beginning to look a lot like Christmas. (And a lot like vacation.) We’re taking off for the holidays. Best wishes for everything merry and bright. We’ll see you in 2019!
________________________________________
The Federal Reserve raised interest rates on Wednesday, against the wishes of President Trump. We were curious about Mr. Trump’s history with the Fed, so we asked Binyamin Appelbaum, who covers economic policy for The Times, for the back story. Here’s what he told us:The Federal Reserve raised interest rates on Wednesday, against the wishes of President Trump. We were curious about Mr. Trump’s history with the Fed, so we asked Binyamin Appelbaum, who covers economic policy for The Times, for the back story. Here’s what he told us:
It was only last November that President Trump and Jerome H. Powell walked together into the White House Rose Garden, where Mr. Trump introduced Mr. Powell as his choice to become the chairman of the Federal Reserve.It was only last November that President Trump and Jerome H. Powell walked together into the White House Rose Garden, where Mr. Trump introduced Mr. Powell as his choice to become the chairman of the Federal Reserve.
“He’s strong,” said Mr. Trump. “He’s committed. He’s smart.”“He’s strong,” said Mr. Trump. “He’s committed. He’s smart.”
But that was before Mr. Powell started raising interest rates.But that was before Mr. Powell started raising interest rates.
Now Mr. Trump has taken to describing Mr. Powell as a “good man” who keeps making mistakes. The Fed, he says, should stop raising rates. Its march toward higher rates is “crazy,” “foolish,” “out of control.”Now Mr. Trump has taken to describing Mr. Powell as a “good man” who keeps making mistakes. The Fed, he says, should stop raising rates. Its march toward higher rates is “crazy,” “foolish,” “out of control.”
What happened to the warm regard Mr. Trump expressed just one year ago? The short answer is that Mr. Trump fears Mr. Powell, who holds a job sometimes described as the second-most powerful in Washington.What happened to the warm regard Mr. Trump expressed just one year ago? The short answer is that Mr. Trump fears Mr. Powell, who holds a job sometimes described as the second-most powerful in Washington.
Two key facts: The Fed is an independent agency; it answers to Congress, not the president. And it has considerable influence over the re-election prospects of any president, because it can drive the economy into a recession.Two key facts: The Fed is an independent agency; it answers to Congress, not the president. And it has considerable influence over the re-election prospects of any president, because it can drive the economy into a recession.
Unlike many past Fed-White House duos, Mr. Trump and Mr. Powell do not have a personal relationship. They have rarely spoken with each other, although they have plenty of mutual acquaintances. Most notably, Mr. Powell regularly eats breakfast with the Treasury secretary, Steven Mnuchin.Unlike many past Fed-White House duos, Mr. Trump and Mr. Powell do not have a personal relationship. They have rarely spoken with each other, although they have plenty of mutual acquaintances. Most notably, Mr. Powell regularly eats breakfast with the Treasury secretary, Steven Mnuchin.
Presidents often seek to put pressure on the Fed through such private channels, although it sometimes takes decades for the details to emerge.Presidents often seek to put pressure on the Fed through such private channels, although it sometimes takes decades for the details to emerge.
Mr. Trump, unusually, has decided to go public with his grievances, and Mr. Powell has responded with public displays of grim-faced, insistent indifference. The Fed, he says, does not take advice from politicians. It does not answer to the president. “Nothing,” he said on Wednesday, after announcing another rate increase, “will deter us from doing exactly what we think is the right thing to do.”Mr. Trump, unusually, has decided to go public with his grievances, and Mr. Powell has responded with public displays of grim-faced, insistent indifference. The Fed, he says, does not take advice from politicians. It does not answer to the president. “Nothing,” he said on Wednesday, after announcing another rate increase, “will deter us from doing exactly what we think is the right thing to do.”
Mr. Trump, in his more reflective moments of public commentary, has said that he misjudged a man he barely knew. As Mr. Trump said of Mr. Powell in October, sounding rather glum, “He was supposed to be a low interest rate guy.”Mr. Trump, in his more reflective moments of public commentary, has said that he misjudged a man he barely knew. As Mr. Trump said of Mr. Powell in October, sounding rather glum, “He was supposed to be a low interest rate guy.”
Read Binyamin’s story: Fed Raises Interest Rates, Showing Confidence in Health of EconomyRead Binyamin’s story: Fed Raises Interest Rates, Showing Confidence in Health of Economy
________________________________________
• Possible intellectual property theft, costly litigation and Instagram — this story about the birth and death of a teeny, tiny bikini has it all.• Possible intellectual property theft, costly litigation and Instagram — this story about the birth and death of a teeny, tiny bikini has it all.
• A secret project, run by a group of Democratic tech experts, used Russian online manipulation tactics to try and sway the Alabama Senate race. The experiment may offer a hint of what’s to come in U.S. elections.• A secret project, run by a group of Democratic tech experts, used Russian online manipulation tactics to try and sway the Alabama Senate race. The experiment may offer a hint of what’s to come in U.S. elections.
• What happened to GE? This Wall Street Journal deep dive walks through the fall of one of America’s most iconic brands.• What happened to GE? This Wall Street Journal deep dive walks through the fall of one of America’s most iconic brands.
________________________________________
To celebrate the end of 2018, The Times’s Style section made a game. It’s sort of an endurance test. For news. It’s weird. But also cool. Click and see for yourself.To celebrate the end of 2018, The Times’s Style section made a game. It’s sort of an endurance test. For news. It’s weird. But also cool. Click and see for yourself.
__________________________________________
Were you forwarded this newsletter? Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox.Were you forwarded this newsletter? Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox.
Thanks for reading. Politics is more than what goes on inside the White House. On Politics brings you the people, issues and ideas reshaping our world.Thanks for reading. Politics is more than what goes on inside the White House. On Politics brings you the people, issues and ideas reshaping our world.
Is there anything you think we’re missing? Anything you want to see more of? We’d love to hear from you. Email us at onpolitics@nytimes.com.Is there anything you think we’re missing? Anything you want to see more of? We’d love to hear from you. Email us at onpolitics@nytimes.com.