This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/dec/20/harvey-weinstein-court-sexual-assault-case-new-york

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Harvey Weinstein: judge rejects bid to dismiss sexual assault charges Harvey Weinstein: judge rejects bid to dismiss sexual assault charges
(about 1 hour later)
Sexual assault charges against the disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein may proceed, a New York judge ruled on Thursday. Sexual assault charges against the disgraced film producer’s Harvey Weinstein may proceed, a New York judge ruled on Thursday.
Weinstein and his attorneys had sought to get the charges dismissed, but Judge James Burke rejected that request at a court hearing. Judge James Burke rejected a motion from Weinstein’s attorneys to dismiss the criminal charges against him.
The ruling is a boon for the prosecution, which has been clouded by allegations that police acted improperly in the investigation that led to Weinstein’s arrest in May.
#MeToo has been misrepresented as plot against men, says founder#MeToo has been misrepresented as plot against men, says founder
Weinstein did not speak as he arrived at court to learn the future of his sexual assault case, which has been clouded by allegations that police acted improperly in the investigation that led to his arrest. Weinstein, 66, is charged with raping a woman he knew in a hotel room in March 2013 and forcibly performing oral sex on another woman in 2006 at his Manhattan apartment. He has denied all allegations of nonconsensual sex.
Weinstein is charged with raping a woman he knew in a hotel room in March 2013 and forcibly performing oral sex on another woman in 2006 at his Manhattan apartment. He denies all allegations of non-consensual sex. Weinstein’s lawyers argued the case had been “irreparably tainted” by a detective’s alleged coaching of a potential witness and one of the accusers. They also said the grand jury should have been shown evidence that Weinstein had exchanged friendly emails with his two accusers after the alleged attacks.
Weinstein’s lawyers say the case has devolved into chaos and was “irreparably tainted” by Det Nicholas DiGaudio’s alleged interference with a witness and an accuser. Prosecutors say there is “ample evidence” to put Weinstein, 66, on trial and that DiGaudio allegations have not sullied the rest of the case. Prosecutors said their case was strong, with “ample evidence” to put Weinstein on trial, and that any misconduct by the detective did not affect the rest of the case.
More soon After the hearing, Weinstein’s lawyer, Benjamin Brafman, said he is still confident the former Hollywood heavy hitter will be “completely exonerated” at trial.
“We intend to vigorously defend this case to the best of our ability,” Brafman said.
Weinstein, wearing a business suit and tie, who remains free on $1m bail, left court without commenting.
Actors Marisa Tomei and Amber Tamblyn were in court Thursday to show support for the accusers, along with other women supporting the Time’s Up advocacy and legal defense group for sexual assault and harassment survivors and the wider movement known as #MeToo that was revitalized by mass allegations against Weinstein exposed in October 2017.
“Today, here in New York, we saw the first steps towards justice,” Time’s Up president Lisa Borders said after the judge’s ruling. Weinstein has “failed in his efforts to avoid accountability for his crimes”, she said.
Weinstein’s defense was boosted in October this year by back-to-back allegations of misconduct in the police investigation.
Manhattan district attorney Cyrus Vance Jr dropped one of the charges against him – allegations that he raped an aspiring actress who was still in college – after evidence surfaced that Det Nicholas DiGaudio instructed a potential witness to keep some of her doubts about the veracity of the allegations to herself.
DiGaudio allegedly told the witness in February that when she spoke to prosecutors, “less is more”. That witness never testified before the grand jury that indicted Weinstein.
Prosecutors also disclosed an allegation that DiGaudio urged the 2013 rape accuser to delete private material from her cellphones before handing them over to the district attorney’s office.
But the district attorney’s office said the material didn’t pertain to Weinstein and she did not actually delete anything.
Attorney Gloria Allred, who represents one of the accusers, said there is “still time for other accusers to come forward” in the criminal case.
She encouraged anyone who might have relevant evidence to report it.
Harvey WeinsteinHarvey Weinstein
New YorkNew York
Law (US)Law (US)
#MeToo movement#MeToo movement
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content