This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/dec/20/jk-rowling-rejects-former-pas-claims-as-court-case-continues
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| JK Rowling rejects former PA's claims as court case continues | JK Rowling rejects former PA's claims as court case continues |
| (30 days later) | |
| JK Rowling has said she does not accept claims made in court by her former personal assistant, who is accused of fraudulently using the author’s credit card for spending sprees. | JK Rowling has said she does not accept claims made in court by her former personal assistant, who is accused of fraudulently using the author’s credit card for spending sprees. |
| The author took the unusual step of issuing the statement while Amanda Donaldson, 35, is appearing at Airdrie sheriff court in a civil case, accused of unauthorised spending and the taking of Harry Potter merchandise to a total value of almost £24,000. | The author took the unusual step of issuing the statement while Amanda Donaldson, 35, is appearing at Airdrie sheriff court in a civil case, accused of unauthorised spending and the taking of Harry Potter merchandise to a total value of almost £24,000. |
| Donaldson gave evidence on Tuesday describing Rowling as sometimes generous but also unapproachable, and said she was offended by the fraud allegations. | Donaldson gave evidence on Tuesday describing Rowling as sometimes generous but also unapproachable, and said she was offended by the fraud allegations. |
| Rowling hit back at the claims and repeated her view that she had been left with no option but to raise the court action. | Rowling hit back at the claims and repeated her view that she had been left with no option but to raise the court action. |
| A statement issued on behalf of the author said: “JK Rowling is taking legal action against her former personal assistant Amanda Donaldson following her dismissal for gross misconduct involving a substantial breach of trust. | A statement issued on behalf of the author said: “JK Rowling is taking legal action against her former personal assistant Amanda Donaldson following her dismissal for gross misconduct involving a substantial breach of trust. |
| “Ms Donaldson’s dismissal last year related to alleged abuses of her expense account and misplacement of items amounting to a significant value. Ms Rowling does not accept the position as stated by Amanda Donaldson in her evidence, and does not find that she has adequately explained her excessive spending on the business credit card or the missing items and cash.” | “Ms Donaldson’s dismissal last year related to alleged abuses of her expense account and misplacement of items amounting to a significant value. Ms Rowling does not accept the position as stated by Amanda Donaldson in her evidence, and does not find that she has adequately explained her excessive spending on the business credit card or the missing items and cash.” |
| It continued: “Before raising the court action, Ms Rowling and her husband gave Ms Donaldson every opportunity to explain the discrepancies in her credit card spending and the missing items and cash, but Ms Donaldson chose to deny any wrongdoing and instead to blame other members of Ms Rowling’s staff. | It continued: “Before raising the court action, Ms Rowling and her husband gave Ms Donaldson every opportunity to explain the discrepancies in her credit card spending and the missing items and cash, but Ms Donaldson chose to deny any wrongdoing and instead to blame other members of Ms Rowling’s staff. |
| “During her evidence, Ms Rowling explained to the court that she was left with no option but to raise the court action in order to protect the reputation of her existing staff and to ensure Ms Donaldson is not in the position to breach the trust of another employer. | “During her evidence, Ms Rowling explained to the court that she was left with no option but to raise the court action in order to protect the reputation of her existing staff and to ensure Ms Donaldson is not in the position to breach the trust of another employer. |
| “As this is now a matter for the sheriff to determine, it is not appropriate to comment further at this time.” | “As this is now a matter for the sheriff to determine, it is not appropriate to comment further at this time.” |
| Donaldson was suspended and later dismissed in 2017 over the alleged incidents. | Donaldson was suspended and later dismissed in 2017 over the alleged incidents. |
| The author is seeking damages in the civil case, brought under her married name, Joanne Murray. She alleges Donaldson made transactions including £3,629 in Molton Brown, £2,139 in Paper Tiger and more than £1,800 in Starbucks and Costa on a company credit card without authorisation. | The author is seeking damages in the civil case, brought under her married name, Joanne Murray. She alleges Donaldson made transactions including £3,629 in Molton Brown, £2,139 in Paper Tiger and more than £1,800 in Starbucks and Costa on a company credit card without authorisation. |
| The civil case before the sheriff, Derek O’Carroll, was due to continue on Thursday. | The civil case before the sheriff, Derek O’Carroll, was due to continue on Thursday. |
| JK Rowling | JK Rowling |
| Scotland | Scotland |
| news | news |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |
Previous version
1
Next version