This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-46617577

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Santander failed to pass on inheritances Santander failed to pass on inheritances
(about 2 hours later)
Santander UK has been fined £32.8m by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for failing to properly process the accounts of deceased customers.Santander UK has been fined £32.8m by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for failing to properly process the accounts of deceased customers.
Santander did not transfer funds totalling over £183m to beneficiaries when it should have done, affecting a total of 40,428 customers directly.Santander did not transfer funds totalling over £183m to beneficiaries when it should have done, affecting a total of 40,428 customers directly.
And, after it became aware of the issues, the bank failed to disclose the problems to the FCA.And, after it became aware of the issues, the bank failed to disclose the problems to the FCA.
Santander said it was "very sorry" for the impact its failings caused.Santander said it was "very sorry" for the impact its failings caused.
"We accept the FCA's findings and have fully cooperated with their investigation," said Santander UK's chief executive Nathan Bostock."We accept the FCA's findings and have fully cooperated with their investigation," said Santander UK's chief executive Nathan Bostock.
"We have now transferred the majority of customer funds and made significant improvements to our whole probate and bereavement process, ensuring we provide both a sensitive and efficient service to our bereaved customer representatives and those who are managing the estates of people who have passed away.""We have now transferred the majority of customer funds and made significant improvements to our whole probate and bereavement process, ensuring we provide both a sensitive and efficient service to our bereaved customer representatives and those who are managing the estates of people who have passed away."
Mark Steward, executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA said that the failings "took too long to be identified and then far too long to be fixed".Mark Steward, executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA said that the failings "took too long to be identified and then far too long to be fixed".
"To the firm's credit, once these problems were notified to the board and senior management, they were fixed properly and promptly, but recognition of the problem took too long," he said."To the firm's credit, once these problems were notified to the board and senior management, they were fixed properly and promptly, but recognition of the problem took too long," he said.
There were weaknesses in how Santander organised and controlled its probate and bereavement processes, the FCA added.There were weaknesses in how Santander organised and controlled its probate and bereavement processes, the FCA added.
This meant that the bank:This meant that the bank:
As a result, despite Santander being informed that a customer had died, funds would not be transferred to those who were entitled to them.As a result, despite Santander being informed that a customer had died, funds would not be transferred to those who were entitled to them.
'Santander still has my money' Cary Sumpter, a surveyor from Bexhill-on-Sea, says that Santander is still holding onto money from his late aunt's estate.
Cary Sumpter, a surveyor from Bexhill-on-Sea, told the BBC that when his aunt died in 2010, his mother and the appointed solicitors spent months telephoning and writing to Santander to release funds from his aunt's bank accounts. When Mr Sumpter's aunt died in 2010, his mother and the appointed solicitors spent months telephoning and writing to Santander to release funds from his aunt's bank accounts.
"There was certainly several hundred pounds in one account, and we thought there were other accounts, but we could never find out," said Mr Sumpter."There was certainly several hundred pounds in one account, and we thought there were other accounts, but we could never find out," said Mr Sumpter.
"Santander wouldn't return calls or emails; they blocked all attempts to find out.""Santander wouldn't return calls or emails; they blocked all attempts to find out."
In the end, the aunt's estate was settled without the funds held by Santander.In the end, the aunt's estate was settled without the funds held by Santander.
"The solicitors eventually advised us to stop chasing, since it was costing more than the amount was worth," added Mr Sumpter."The solicitors eventually advised us to stop chasing, since it was costing more than the amount was worth," added Mr Sumpter.
"To this day, that money is still sitting somewhere in the coffers of Santander.""To this day, that money is still sitting somewhere in the coffers of Santander."
'Santander held £120,000 for 13 years'
Karl Lenobel was a Holocaust survivor who died in 2004 at the age of 84, leaving behind no surviving relatives.
His older sister Katherine, a Kindertransport refugee who died in 2001, had worked for Abbey National and had had several bank accounts with the building society, which was later acquired by Santander.
Before Karl died, he appointed Geoffrey Greenhouse as his solicitor. He and his sister wanted to leave their collective savings to children's charities, in the hope of giving other children the childhoods they had never had.
Mr Greenhouse chased Santander for the bank accounts, but he hit a dead end.
Then 13 years later in 2017, after it was already under investigation by the FCA, Santander contacted him saying it had been holding onto £120,000.
Under pressure from Mr Greenhouse, the bank agreed to pay £100,000 in compensation for the long delay in locating the funds, and the money was finally given to three children's charities, as well as the children of a fellow Holocaust survivor.
"I don't think it was a mistake - the banks did it deliberately," Mr Greenhouse said.
He told the BBC that many people who grew up during and just after the Second World War had opened accounts with building societies, that might now be lying dormant.
"They had large sums of money held in what they considered dormant accounts, and it was convenient for them not to pay that money or to find out where the original owners were.
"I do hope all these relatives of people who have dormant accounts are contacted and they get their money back."
'Errors of judgement''Errors of judgement'
And in instances where deceased customers had several different bank accounts and investments, the bank failed to identify these funds, which meant that those who were entitled to them remained unaware of the existence of those funds.And in instances where deceased customers had several different bank accounts and investments, the bank failed to identify these funds, which meant that those who were entitled to them remained unaware of the existence of those funds.
Melinda Giles, partner at Giles Wilson Solicitors, and a representative for private client solicitors on the Law Society Council, told the BBC that similar incidents have occurred at other British banks, because there was "too much of a relaxed approach" from many banks to the legal process.Melinda Giles, partner at Giles Wilson Solicitors, and a representative for private client solicitors on the Law Society Council, told the BBC that similar incidents have occurred at other British banks, because there was "too much of a relaxed approach" from many banks to the legal process.
"I have come across errors of judgement by a variety of banks in that they do not insist on a grant of probate to be sure that they are paying the money that belongs to a deceased person to the correct person entitled," she said."I have come across errors of judgement by a variety of banks in that they do not insist on a grant of probate to be sure that they are paying the money that belongs to a deceased person to the correct person entitled," she said.
"The news about Santander is disappointing because solicitors are very keen to work with banks to ensure that the rule of law is followed.""The news about Santander is disappointing because solicitors are very keen to work with banks to ensure that the rule of law is followed."
She added that in many cases, people do not use a probate lawyer, and they assume that the bank knows what their legal rights are. However, the banks sometimes lack knowledge of the legal process.She added that in many cases, people do not use a probate lawyer, and they assume that the bank knows what their legal rights are. However, the banks sometimes lack knowledge of the legal process.