This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/19/grace-millane-new-zealand-rebukes-google-for-emailing-out-suspects-name

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Grace Millane murder: New Zealand rebukes Google for emailing out suspect's name Grace Millane murder: New Zealand rebukes Google for emailing out suspect's name
(about 17 hours later)
Google has been forced to explain to the New Zealand government why it breached the country’s strict suppression laws by naming the man charged with murdering British backpacker Grace Millane.Google has been forced to explain to the New Zealand government why it breached the country’s strict suppression laws by naming the man charged with murdering British backpacker Grace Millane.
The company said it had occurred by mistake, but stopped short of apologising for the blunder. Senior policy manager Ross Young told media Google had acted when it had been made aware of the court order, four days after it was issued.The company said it had occurred by mistake, but stopped short of apologising for the blunder. Senior policy manager Ross Young told media Google had acted when it had been made aware of the court order, four days after it was issued.
“We understand what the concerns are in this very sensitive matter. Google has acted on this situation. We have had a constructive discussion today [with justice minister Andrew Little] ... explaining our processes and looking how we can address similar situations in the future,” he said.“We understand what the concerns are in this very sensitive matter. Google has acted on this situation. We have had a constructive discussion today [with justice minister Andrew Little] ... explaining our processes and looking how we can address similar situations in the future,” he said.
However, justice minister Andrew Little – who met Google’s NZ boss Caroline Rainsford and Young in Wellington on Tuesday afternoon – said he had made it clear suppressions orders applied whether publishers had seen them or not.However, justice minister Andrew Little – who met Google’s NZ boss Caroline Rainsford and Young in Wellington on Tuesday afternoon – said he had made it clear suppressions orders applied whether publishers had seen them or not.
“They pointed out the difficulty they have. I said ‘I’m simply not sympathetic to that’. I’ve got to make sure orders handed down are respected the minute they’re handed down,” he said.“They pointed out the difficulty they have. I said ‘I’m simply not sympathetic to that’. I’ve got to make sure orders handed down are respected the minute they’re handed down,” he said.
“It’s up to [Google] to work out how to do that. If they don’t I could look to our domestic laws to see whether they’re effective, but if not I’ll have to work with other countries.”“It’s up to [Google] to work out how to do that. If they don’t I could look to our domestic laws to see whether they’re effective, but if not I’ll have to work with other countries.”
Google was the subject of intense criticism last week after sending out the name of the accused 26-year-old man in the subject line of an email to people subscribed to their email list of search terms trending in New Zealand, despite the country’s courts ordering he could not be publicly identified.Google was the subject of intense criticism last week after sending out the name of the accused 26-year-old man in the subject line of an email to people subscribed to their email list of search terms trending in New Zealand, despite the country’s courts ordering he could not be publicly identified.
The email also said there had been 100,000 searches of the man’s name around the country.The email also said there had been 100,000 searches of the man’s name around the country.
Having earlier rebuked some parts of the British media for naming the accused, Little turned to the internet company, saying he would meet its executives to explain the risks to fair trial rights it was posing, calling it “unacceptable”. Having earlier rebuked some parts of the British media for naming the accused in online reports that were viewable within New Zealand’s jurisdiction, Little turned to the internet company, saying he would meet its executives to explain the risks to fair trial rights it was posing, calling it “unacceptable”.
After the meeting, Little told reporters the company had agreed to look at its systems to avoid a re-occurrence.After the meeting, Little told reporters the company had agreed to look at its systems to avoid a re-occurrence.
“Publishing across borders might be the reality of the world today, but no justice system should be held to ransom and told that your orders to ensure a fair trial are no longer relevant. That is simply not acceptable anywhere,” he said.“Publishing across borders might be the reality of the world today, but no justice system should be held to ransom and told that your orders to ensure a fair trial are no longer relevant. That is simply not acceptable anywhere,” he said.
Millane was found dead on the outskirts of Auckland earlier this month after going missing in the city on 1 December, the day before her 22nd birthday.Millane was found dead on the outskirts of Auckland earlier this month after going missing in the city on 1 December, the day before her 22nd birthday.
The man she was last seen with has been charged with her murder and was granted a temporary name suppression when he appeared in court for the first time on 10 December.The man she was last seen with has been charged with her murder and was granted a temporary name suppression when he appeared in court for the first time on 10 December.
Little earlier said naming the accused overseas risked breaching his right to a fair trial and risked compromising the case against him, which could mean Millane’s family did not see justice.Little earlier said naming the accused overseas risked breaching his right to a fair trial and risked compromising the case against him, which could mean Millane’s family did not see justice.
Such restrictions are not uncommon in the early stages of legal cases in New Zealand.Such restrictions are not uncommon in the early stages of legal cases in New Zealand.
World newsWorld news
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content