This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/15/us/wisconsin-scott-walker-courts.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Wisconsin Power Struggle Appears Bound for Court, Long Favorable to Republicans The Battle for Power in Wisconsin Seems Bound for Court. It’s Only Going to Get Uglier.
(about 4 hours later)
Wisconsin’s judiciary, officially nonpartisan, has been marred in recent years by political intrigue, divisive elections and even accusations of one judge placing another in a chokehold.Wisconsin’s judiciary, officially nonpartisan, has been marred in recent years by political intrigue, divisive elections and even accusations of one judge placing another in a chokehold.
Now it may be what decides the fate of the outgoing governor’s new laws to limit the power of his successor. Now it may decide the fate of the outgoing governor’s new laws to limit the power of his successor.
“There will be a challenge, no doubt,” Gov. Scott Walker said a few days before he signed bills expanding the power of legislative Republicans he teamed up with over the last decade. “They’ve challenged just about everything we or lawmakers have done.”“There will be a challenge, no doubt,” Gov. Scott Walker said a few days before he signed bills expanding the power of legislative Republicans he teamed up with over the last decade. “They’ve challenged just about everything we or lawmakers have done.”
The threat of litigation has rarely dissuaded Mr. Walker, a Republican who reshaped Wisconsin in his conservative image and who signed the power-shifting measures on Friday afternoon as one of his final acts in office. The judiciary has upheld several of Mr. Walker’s signature policies in recent years, despite fierce challenges from the left. And as Mr. Walker predicted, liberal groups quickly vowed legal action on the new legislation. The threat of litigation has rarely dissuaded Mr. Walker, a Republican who reshaped Wisconsin in his conservative image and who signed the power-shifting measures on Friday afternoon as one of his final acts in office. The judiciary has upheld several of Mr. Walker’s signature policies in recent years, despite challenges from the left. And as Mr. Walker predicted, liberal groups quickly vowed legal action on the new legislation.
“This is a shameful attack on our democracy by politicians who will do anything to hold onto power,” said Eric H. Holder Jr., an attorney general under President Barack Obama who leads one of the groups that has promised a court fight. In a statement, Mr. Holder called the new laws “grossly partisan” and “deeply undemocratic.”“This is a shameful attack on our democracy by politicians who will do anything to hold onto power,” said Eric H. Holder Jr., an attorney general under President Barack Obama who leads one of the groups that has promised a court fight. In a statement, Mr. Holder called the new laws “grossly partisan” and “deeply undemocratic.”
After Democrats won top posts in a state that had been controlled over the last eight years by Republicans, Wisconsin is at the center of a bitter national debate over political norms, the transfer of power between parties and the roles of the executive and legislative branches. A similar power struggle in North Carolina, after a Democratic governor won election in 2016, set off a court battle, and the fate of Wisconsin’s new laws seems destined for that as well.After Democrats won top posts in a state that had been controlled over the last eight years by Republicans, Wisconsin is at the center of a bitter national debate over political norms, the transfer of power between parties and the roles of the executive and legislative branches. A similar power struggle in North Carolina, after a Democratic governor won election in 2016, set off a court battle, and the fate of Wisconsin’s new laws seems destined for that as well.
The courts have played a central role in a larger ideological split that has unfolded across the state — which both Mr. Obama and President Trump carried and where its two United States senators, Ron Johnson, a Republican, and Tammy Baldwin, a Democrat, could not be more different.The courts have played a central role in a larger ideological split that has unfolded across the state — which both Mr. Obama and President Trump carried and where its two United States senators, Ron Johnson, a Republican, and Tammy Baldwin, a Democrat, could not be more different.
With conservatives holding a one-vote majority, the State Supreme Court has also been at the forefront of a pattern Democrats say they have grown tired of: Republicans pass right-leaning policies despite protests, Mr. Walker signs them, and the judiciary upholds them, even if a local judge first expresses skepticism. (Mr. Walker’s opponents have had somewhat better luck in federal courts, where Mr. Holder’s group said it intends to act.)With conservatives holding a one-vote majority, the State Supreme Court has also been at the forefront of a pattern Democrats say they have grown tired of: Republicans pass right-leaning policies despite protests, Mr. Walker signs them, and the judiciary upholds them, even if a local judge first expresses skepticism. (Mr. Walker’s opponents have had somewhat better luck in federal courts, where Mr. Holder’s group said it intends to act.)
“They’re acting as a rubber stamp,” Matthew Rothschild, executive director of the liberal Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, said of the State Supreme Court. He called the judiciary “a crucial lever of power for Republicans” that had allowed the “Walker wrecking crew” to advance its policies.“They’re acting as a rubber stamp,” Matthew Rothschild, executive director of the liberal Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, said of the State Supreme Court. He called the judiciary “a crucial lever of power for Republicans” that had allowed the “Walker wrecking crew” to advance its policies.
The court’s ideological divide is clear, but many conservatives in the state reject the rubber-stamp argument.The court’s ideological divide is clear, but many conservatives in the state reject the rubber-stamp argument.
“I don’t think it’s fair to say that so-called liberal judges will always vote for what Democrats want or so-called conservative judges will always vote for what Republicans want,” said Rick Esenberg, a lawyer who is president of the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a conservative group that supported several of the measures Mr. Walker signed Friday.“I don’t think it’s fair to say that so-called liberal judges will always vote for what Democrats want or so-called conservative judges will always vote for what Republicans want,” said Rick Esenberg, a lawyer who is president of the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a conservative group that supported several of the measures Mr. Walker signed Friday.
One example: The Wisconsin Supreme Court this year sided with Tony Evers, the state schools superintendent who is now the governor-elect, when he wanted to hire outside lawyers for a lawsuit. Mr. Evers, who narrowly defeated Mr. Walker in November, is a Democrat.One example: The Wisconsin Supreme Court this year sided with Tony Evers, the state schools superintendent who is now the governor-elect, when he wanted to hire outside lawyers for a lawsuit. Mr. Evers, who narrowly defeated Mr. Walker in November, is a Democrat.
Still, Mr. Walker has repeatedly received friendly rulings from the state’s highest court. And he has expressed confidence that the new measures will ultimately pass legal muster, even if a local judge in a liberal city like Madison strikes some of them down for a time.Still, Mr. Walker has repeatedly received friendly rulings from the state’s highest court. And he has expressed confidence that the new measures will ultimately pass legal muster, even if a local judge in a liberal city like Madison strikes some of them down for a time.
In 2014, State Supreme Court justices validated limits on public sector unions that were Mr. Walker’s signature policy and made him a national figure in the Republican Party. That same year, the court upheld a voter identification law. And in 2015, justices ordered the end to an investigation of whether Mr. Walker’s campaign had illegally coordinated with conservative groups.In 2014, State Supreme Court justices validated limits on public sector unions that were Mr. Walker’s signature policy and made him a national figure in the Republican Party. That same year, the court upheld a voter identification law. And in 2015, justices ordered the end to an investigation of whether Mr. Walker’s campaign had illegally coordinated with conservative groups.
“The Supreme Court has been there for Walker every step of the way,” said Scot Ross, the executive director of the One Wisconsin Institute, a liberal organization that along with Mr. Holder’s group promised to challenge some of the provisions signed Friday.“The Supreme Court has been there for Walker every step of the way,” said Scot Ross, the executive director of the One Wisconsin Institute, a liberal organization that along with Mr. Holder’s group promised to challenge some of the provisions signed Friday.
Mr. Esenberg offered a different explanation for that series of court outcomes: “I don’t think the challenges to any of those laws were particularly strong.”Mr. Esenberg offered a different explanation for that series of court outcomes: “I don’t think the challenges to any of those laws were particularly strong.”
The three laws Mr. Walker signed Friday include a grab bag of provisions ranging from the niche (Mr. Evers would need legislative approval to ban guns at the Capitol) to the expansive (Republican lawmakers could intervene in lawsuits and block more administrative rules). The laws also curbed the authority of the new Democratic attorney general, further codified voter identification and Medicaid work requirements and restricted early voting to two weeks.The three laws Mr. Walker signed Friday include a grab bag of provisions ranging from the niche (Mr. Evers would need legislative approval to ban guns at the Capitol) to the expansive (Republican lawmakers could intervene in lawsuits and block more administrative rules). The laws also curbed the authority of the new Democratic attorney general, further codified voter identification and Medicaid work requirements and restricted early voting to two weeks.
Both Mr. Evers and Josh Kaul, the incoming attorney general, have raised the possibility of suing, but neither had announced lawsuits as of Saturday morning.Both Mr. Evers and Josh Kaul, the incoming attorney general, have raised the possibility of suing, but neither had announced lawsuits as of Saturday morning.
Mr. Ross’s group successfully challenged a previous limit to early voting in the federal courts, and Mr. Ross said he was optimistic that the same judge would block the new restriction on the timing of early voting. Most of the other provisions signed by Mr. Walker appeared to be matters for state judges to decide. That was seen as a roadblock for liberals, who remain in the minority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court despite flipping a conservative-held seat this year in a hard-fought election.Mr. Ross’s group successfully challenged a previous limit to early voting in the federal courts, and Mr. Ross said he was optimistic that the same judge would block the new restriction on the timing of early voting. Most of the other provisions signed by Mr. Walker appeared to be matters for state judges to decide. That was seen as a roadblock for liberals, who remain in the minority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court despite flipping a conservative-held seat this year in a hard-fought election.
Still, Democrats said they have reason for some optimism. Two court seats are up for the election in the next year-and-a-half — one held by a liberal, another by a conservative.Still, Democrats said they have reason for some optimism. Two court seats are up for the election in the next year-and-a-half — one held by a liberal, another by a conservative.
If left-wing jurists were to win both races, the court could look different by the time it hears appeals to Mr. Walker’s new laws.If left-wing jurists were to win both races, the court could look different by the time it hears appeals to Mr. Walker’s new laws.