This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/dec/02/theresa-may-in-battle-over-brexit-legal-advice-as-charm-offensive-begins

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Brexit: Theresa May in battle over legal advice as charm offensive begins Brexit backstop would be 'practical barrier' to trade deal, leaked paper says
(about 3 hours later)
Theresa May faces her first major battle in a crucial period for her Brexit plans, with the government at risk of being declared in contempt of parliament in a row over the publication of official legal advice on the departure deal. A leaked draft legal analysis produced by the House of Commons library warns that the UK will face “a practical barrier” to striking a trade deal with the US or other non-EU countries if the country falls into the backstop customs arrangements.
The prime minister, back in London from the G20 summit in Buenos Aires, will simultaneously begin a charm offensive to win over Conservative MPs in dozens of face-to-face meetings before the Commons votes on the deal on 11 December. The remarks, contained within a draft paper that leaked on Monday morning, emerged hours before the attorney general, Geoffrey Cox, was scheduled to brief the Commons about his advice on the Brexit deal negotiated by May.
On Monday afternoon the attorney general, Geoffrey Cox, is scheduled to brief the Commons about his advice on the Brexit plan before – in an unusual move for the government’s chief law officer – answering questions from MPs. The 27-page document, dated 26 November, says the UK would conform to EU customs rules if it entered the backstop, and adds that this “would be a practical barrier to the UK entering separate trade agreements on goods with third countries”.
Downing Street argues strongly that this will be sufficient information for any MP to make up their mind on the legal aspects of the deal before the upcoming five-day debate, and that it keeps to the protocol that full advice is seen as confidential between lawyer and client. The Northern Ireland backstop has become the most controversial part of the legally binding withdrawal agreement struck by May with the European Union, because it ties the UK to EU rules in order to maintain an open border in Ireland if no free trade agreement has been signed.
Last week, Donald Trump unexpectedly declared he believed that Brexit deal would be “a great deal for the EU” and that the UK “may not be able to trade with us” as a result.
However, during the G20 summit over the weekend, May said the US president was wrong. She said: “I’m very happy to tell President Trump and others that we will have an independent trade policy, we will be able to do trade deals.”
A backstop is required to ensure there is no hard border in Ireland if a comprehensive free trade deal cannot be signed before the end of 2020. Theresa May has proposed to the EU that the whole of the UK would remain in the customs union after Brexit, but Brussels has said it needs more time to evaluate the proposal.
As a result, the EU insists on having its own backstop - the backstop to the backstop - which would mean Northern Ireland would remain in the single market and customs union in the absence of a free trade deal, prompting fierce objections from Conservative hard Brexiters and the DUP, which props up her government.
That prompted May to propose a country-wide alternative in which the whole of the UK would remain in parts of the customs union after Brexit.
“The EU still requires a ‘backstop to the backstop’ – effectively an insurance policy for the insurance policy. And they want this to be the Northern Ireland-only solution that they had previously proposed,” May told MPs.
Raising the stakes, the prime minister said the EU’s insistence amounted to a threat to the constitution of the UK: “We have been clear that we cannot agree to anything that threatens the integrity of our United Kingdom,” she added.
Cox is expected to be questioned intensely by MPs as to what his legal advice says about the backstop, amid criticism that the UK could not exit the customs arrangement without the permission of the EU.
He will speak to MPs on Monday afternoon, at a time when then government is at risk of being declared in contempt of parliament in a row over the publication of official legal advice on the departure deal. Ministers have agreed to publish only a summary, despite losing a vote last month over publishing the full deal.
Downing Street argues strongly that the summary will be sufficient information for any MP to make up their mind on the legal aspects of the deal before the upcoming five-day debate, and that it keeps to the protocol that full advice is seen as confidential between lawyer and client.
But Labour, which last month won a vote on a Commons motion obliging the release of the full advice, is to join forces with other parties, including the Democratic Unionist party (DUP), to try to pressure ministers to accede to their publication demand, using the ominous, if vague, threat of a contempt of parliament motion.But Labour, which last month won a vote on a Commons motion obliging the release of the full advice, is to join forces with other parties, including the Democratic Unionist party (DUP), to try to pressure ministers to accede to their publication demand, using the ominous, if vague, threat of a contempt of parliament motion.
The shadow Brexit secretary, Keir Starmer, said he believed ministers would be in “really deep water” if they sought to thwart the Commons.The shadow Brexit secretary, Keir Starmer, said he believed ministers would be in “really deep water” if they sought to thwart the Commons.
“If they don’t produce it tomorrow then we will start contempt proceedings, and this will be a collision course between the government and parliament,” he told Sky’s Sophy Ridge show. “If they don’t produce it tomorrow, then we will start contempt proceedings, and this will be a collision course between the government and parliament,” he told Sky’s Sophy Ridge.
“I accept that it’s exceptional to have that disclosed. It has happened in the past, but it is exceptional. That’s why we had a debate in parliament – to say: is this the sort of case where it’s so exceptional that it should be disclosed?”“I accept that it’s exceptional to have that disclosed. It has happened in the past, but it is exceptional. That’s why we had a debate in parliament – to say: is this the sort of case where it’s so exceptional that it should be disclosed?”
It is expected that Labour will see how much detail is contained in the “legal position paper” – a précis of the advice given by Cox to cabinet – published on Monday, and in the attorney general’s answers to MPs before deciding on a contempt motion. It is expected Labour will see how much detail is contained in the “legal position paper” – a precis of the advice given by Cox to cabinet – published on Monday, and in the attorney general’s answers to MPs, before deciding on a contempt motion.
In theory, a minister found to be in contempt of parliament could be suspended or even expelled from the Commons, though such sanctions are seen as extremely unlikely.In theory, a minister found to be in contempt of parliament could be suspended or even expelled from the Commons, though such sanctions are seen as extremely unlikely.
Any motion would be cross-party, with the DUP, May’s unofficial coalition partners, expected to join Labour’s efforts along with Labour and the Liberal Democrats. Any motion would be cross-party, with the DUP, May’s unofficial coalition partners, expected to join Labour’s efforts, along with the Liberal Democrats.
A few Conservative MPs have called for the full advice to be published, amid reports at the weekend that Cox had told the cabinet there was a risk the backstop arrangement – the guarantee against a future hard Irish border – could stay in place “indefinitely”. A few Conservative MPs have called for the full advice to be published, amid reports at the weekend that Cox had told the cabinet there was a risk the backstop arrangement could stay in place “indefinitely”.
Two strongly leave-supporting Tories announced they wanted to see the the full advice. David Jones and Simon Clarke, who were both lawyers before becoming MPs, said the importance of next week’s vote made this vital. Two strongly Leave-supporting Tories announced they wanted to see the the full advice. David Jones and Simon Clarke, who were both lawyers before becoming MPs, said the importance of next week’s vote made this vital.
Clarke said: “We are about to embark on the most significant debate in parliament for many decades. The functioning of the backstop and our ability to ever leave it will lie at the heart of it, and the advice the attorney general has laid before the cabinet is crucial.”Clarke said: “We are about to embark on the most significant debate in parliament for many decades. The functioning of the backstop and our ability to ever leave it will lie at the heart of it, and the advice the attorney general has laid before the cabinet is crucial.”
Boris Johnson used his latest Daily Telegraph column to add to the calls to publish the advice in full. The former foreign secretary said it was “outrageous that the public should be prevented from knowing the full legal implications of this appalling deal”.Boris Johnson used his latest Daily Telegraph column to add to the calls to publish the advice in full. The former foreign secretary said it was “outrageous that the public should be prevented from knowing the full legal implications of this appalling deal”.
A key issue for May is whether dissent spreads to more moderate MPs. One centrist Tory said: “There is good reason for advice to stay confidential. The issue here is trust. Given Brexit divisions, can this hold? Possibly not.”A key issue for May is whether dissent spreads to more moderate MPs. One centrist Tory said: “There is good reason for advice to stay confidential. The issue here is trust. Given Brexit divisions, can this hold? Possibly not.”
If MPs reject the deal, there are seven possible paths the country could go down next.
May brings it back to MPsPerhaps with minor tweaks after a dash to Brussels. ​MPs knuckle under and vote it through.
May resigns immediatelyIt is hard to imagine her surviving for long. After a rapid leadership contest, a different leader could appeal to a majority in parliament, perhaps by offering a softer deal.
Tory backbenchers depose herJacob Rees-Mogg gets his way and there is a no-confidence vote. A new leader then tries to assemble a majority behind a tweaked deal.
May calls a general electionMay could choose to take the ultimate gamble and hope that voters would back her deal, over the heads of squabbling MPs.
Labour tries to force an electionThe opposition tables a vote of no confidence. ​If May lost​, the opposition (or a new Conservative leader) would have two weeks to form an alternative government that could win a second confidence vote. If they were unable to do so, a general election would be triggered.
A second referendum gathers supportThis is most likely if Labour makes a last-ditch decision to back it. 
No dealThe EU (Withdrawal) Act specifies 29 March 2019 as Brexit day. Amber Rudd has said she believes parliament would stop a no deal, but it is not clear how it would do so.
Downing Street is publicly confident that the arrangement for Cox to answer questions should be enough to reassure even the most suspicious or curious MPs. “He will be there to answer any question any MP wants to put to him, so there is going to be full scrutiny. It’s important to note that we are making him available,” a No 10 source said.Downing Street is publicly confident that the arrangement for Cox to answer questions should be enough to reassure even the most suspicious or curious MPs. “He will be there to answer any question any MP wants to put to him, so there is going to be full scrutiny. It’s important to note that we are making him available,” a No 10 source said.
On Sunday the environment secretary, Michael Gove, conceded that he shared the worry of many Tories about the UK being unable to exit the backstop without the say-so of the EU. “I would have preferred it if we had a unilateral right of exit,” Gove told BBC One’s Andrew Marr show. May will also simultaneously begin a charm offensive to win over Conservative MPs in dozens of face-to-face meetings before the crucial Commons votes on the deal on 11 December.
But Gove argued EU leaders would oppose the idea of the UK being kept indefinitely in the arrangement, as this would “see Britain having a competitive advantage over their country”. In another Brexit wrangle, May and Jeremy Corbyn are still yet to agree the format for a mooted TV debate between the pair next Sunday. The Labour leader said he was happy to hold a head-to-head encounter on the BBC, while a No 10 spokesman said Corbyn’s “confected demands” meant he was trying to obstruct the process.
The government believes a unilateral exit mechanism for the backstop would be impossible to negotiate – not least because the EU would be concerned about what might then happen if May was replaced by another prime minister.
In an other Brexit wrangle, May and Jeremy Corbyn are yet to agree the format for a mooted TV debate between the pair next Sunday. The Labour leader said he was happy to hold a head-to-head encounter on the BBC, while a No 10 spokesman said Corbyn’s “confected demands” meant he was trying to obstruct the process.
BrexitBrexit
Road to the vote
Theresa MayTheresa May
ConservativesConservatives
Geoffrey CoxGeoffrey Cox
Foreign policyForeign policy
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content