This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/wales/south_west/6177695.stm
The article has changed 13 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Corus in court over fatal blast | Corus in court over fatal blast |
| (10 minutes later) | |
| Corus is due in court over failing to ensure workers' safety after an inquiry into a blast at its Port Talbot plant which killed three and injured 12 men. | Corus is due in court over failing to ensure workers' safety after an inquiry into a blast at its Port Talbot plant which killed three and injured 12 men. |
| The explosion in 2001 destroyed blast furnace number five, lifting it off its base and blasting out 200 tonnes of steel slag and hot gasses. | The explosion in 2001 destroyed blast furnace number five, lifting it off its base and blasting out 200 tonnes of steel slag and hot gasses. |
| Len Radford, from Maesteg, Andrew Hutin and Stephen Galsworthy, from Port Talbot, all died | Len Radford, from Maesteg, Andrew Hutin and Stephen Galsworthy, from Port Talbot, all died |
| The hearing at Swansea Crown Court is scheduled to last two days. | The hearing at Swansea Crown Court is scheduled to last two days. |
| If the case goes against them, Corus could face unlimited financial penalties - the highest precedent being Transco's £15m fine in 2005, for a gas leak that killed a family of four in South Lanarkshire. | If the case goes against them, Corus could face unlimited financial penalties - the highest precedent being Transco's £15m fine in 2005, for a gas leak that killed a family of four in South Lanarkshire. |
| Corus UK Ltd faces two charges in the prosecution by the HSE for breaches of health and safety law, following the conclusion of its investigation into the explosion at the furnace. | Corus UK Ltd faces two charges in the prosecution by the HSE for breaches of health and safety law, following the conclusion of its investigation into the explosion at the furnace. |
| The first criminal charge alleges the company did not ensure the safety of its employees and the second charge alleges it did not ensure contractors were not exposed to risks to their safety. | The first criminal charge alleges the company did not ensure the safety of its employees and the second charge alleges it did not ensure contractors were not exposed to risks to their safety. |
| Corus admitted civil liability for one of the worst accidents in the UK's steel industry for 26 years, around 12 months after the explosion. Negotiations about compensation are still on-going. | |
| Stephen Galsworthy, Andrew Hutin, and Len Radford died in the explosion | Stephen Galsworthy, Andrew Hutin, and Len Radford died in the explosion |
| In 2003, the HSE published a report into the explosion which said its likely cause was water coming into contact with hot material in the furnace. | In 2003, the HSE published a report into the explosion which said its likely cause was water coming into contact with hot material in the furnace. |
| It found the explosion was so powerful, it had lifted the top half of the furnace up, which allowed about 200 tonnes of slag and molten metal and a large volume of hot blast gases to be ejected. | It found the explosion was so powerful, it had lifted the top half of the furnace up, which allowed about 200 tonnes of slag and molten metal and a large volume of hot blast gases to be ejected. |
| The blast furnace gas subsequently ignited and flames enveloped the furnace, the report said. | The blast furnace gas subsequently ignited and flames enveloped the furnace, the report said. |
| In August 2005, an inquest into the three deaths ended in verdicts of accidental death. | In August 2005, an inquest into the three deaths ended in verdicts of accidental death. |
| The jury had been told during the four-week inquest that urgent repairs had begun on the furnace the day before the blast on 8 November, 2001. | The jury had been told during the four-week inquest that urgent repairs had begun on the furnace the day before the blast on 8 November, 2001. |
| After it became apparent water was getting into the furnace, a number of workers took part in a meeting to discuss what to do about the problem. | After it became apparent water was getting into the furnace, a number of workers took part in a meeting to discuss what to do about the problem. |
| The inquest jury was told that the explosion happened about one hour and 15 minutes after that meeting. | The inquest jury was told that the explosion happened about one hour and 15 minutes after that meeting. |