This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/441192-dorsey-benioff-twitter-homeless-sanfran/

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Liberal billionaires duel over who wants to help San Francisco homeless more Liberal billionaires duel over who wants to help San Francisco homeless more
(about 9 hours later)
Billionaires Jack Dorsey, founder of Twitter, and Salesforce head Marc Benioff squared off over whether San Francisco tech giants should be taxed to help solve the city’s catastrophic homelessness problem.Billionaires Jack Dorsey, founder of Twitter, and Salesforce head Marc Benioff squared off over whether San Francisco tech giants should be taxed to help solve the city’s catastrophic homelessness problem.
At the midterms next month residents of the ultra-liberal city will be asked to vote on Proposition C – a new tax, amounting to approximately 0.5 percent on revenues above $50 million, for businesses headquartered in the city. The tax, which will affect Twitter, Uber, Wells Fargo, Gap and dozens of other major multinationals, could bring in $300 million per year, doubling the city’s homelessness budget. At the midterm elections next month, residents of the ultra-liberal city will be asked to vote on Proposition C – a new tax amounting to approximately 0.5 percent on revenues above $50 million for businesses headquartered in the city.
But Jack Dorsey, a self-confessed liberal, spoke out against the idea. The tax, which would affect Twitter, Uber, Wells Fargo, Gap, and dozens of other major multinationals, could bring in $300 million per year, doubling the city’s homelessness budget.
 “I want to help fix the homeless problem in SF and California. I don’t believe this (Prop C) is the best way to do it,” he wrote on his Twitter account. But Jack Dorsey, an avowed liberal, spoke out against the idea.
Instead, Dorsey asked residents to support the newly-elected Democrat mayor of the city, London Breed, who has not endorsed the proposal. Breed has initially promised to audit the money that is already being spent, to calculate whether it is actually tackling or encouraging the problem, which has worsened in lockstep with the city’s wealth. “I want to help fix the homeless problem in SF and California. I don’t believe this (Prop C) is the best way to do it,” he tweeted.
But the tweet caught the attention of Benioff, one of the main ideologues of Proposition C, who is spending over $1 million of his own money to lobby and advertise it. Instead, Dorsey asked residents to support the newly-elected Democrat mayor of the city, London Breed, who has not endorsed the proposal. Breed has promised to audit the money that is already being spent, to see if it is actually tackling the problem, which has worsened in lockstep with the city’s wealth.
And straight away, he made it personal. The tweet caught the attention of Benioff, one of the main ideologues of Proposition C, who is spending over $1 million of his own money to lobby and advertise for it.
Dorsey argued that he was merely being reasonable. And right off the bat, he made it personal.
But Benioff, himself a solid liberal, countered that the benefits from the tax would be specific and tangible. Dorsey argued that he was simply being reasonable.
In the end, rather than continuing the fight online, the two men, whose combined wealth exceeds $10 billion, decided to take it offline, though Jack did not make it through initially. Benioff, also a liberal, countered that the benefits from the tax would be specific and tangible.
In the end, rather than continuing the fight online, the two men, whose combined wealth exceeds $10 billion, decided to take it offline.
The internecine warfare split those online.The internecine warfare split those online.
But while some insisted that the vote is a straightforward pro or anti-homeless referendum, whatever the decision in November finding the right combination between compassion, toughness and effectiveness, is going to be a challenge for the Democrat-dominated city hall, where every new administration has come in with the best of intentions.But while some insisted that the vote is a straightforward pro or anti-homeless referendum, whatever the decision in November finding the right combination between compassion, toughness and effectiveness, is going to be a challenge for the Democrat-dominated city hall, where every new administration has come in with the best of intentions.
If you like this story, share it with a friend!If you like this story, share it with a friend!