This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7694408.stm

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 7 Version 8
Extremists face tougher UK entry Extremists face tougher UK entry
(29 minutes later)
A "presumption in favour of exclusion" is being introduced to make it easier to prevent extremists entering the UK, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith has said.A "presumption in favour of exclusion" is being introduced to make it easier to prevent extremists entering the UK, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith has said.
Ms Smith said it would now be up to the individual concerned to prove they would not "stir up tension" in the UK.Ms Smith said it would now be up to the individual concerned to prove they would not "stir up tension" in the UK.
For the first time a list of the names of those excluded - including so-called "preachers of hate" - will be published and shared with other countries.For the first time a list of the names of those excluded - including so-called "preachers of hate" - will be published and shared with other countries.
Since 2005 230 people have been barred from entering the UK.Since 2005 230 people have been barred from entering the UK.
About 80 of them are religious extremists.
Ms Smith said: "Through these tough new measures I will stop those who want to spread extremism, hatred and violent messages in our communities from coming to our country.Ms Smith said: "Through these tough new measures I will stop those who want to spread extremism, hatred and violent messages in our communities from coming to our country.
"Coming to the UK is a privilege and I refuse to extend that privilege to individuals who abuse our standards and values to undermine our way of life." Who are those banned from Britain?"Coming to the UK is a privilege and I refuse to extend that privilege to individuals who abuse our standards and values to undermine our way of life." Who are those banned from Britain?
The changes will not require new legislation and are aimed at tackling radical Islamists, neo-Nazis and violent animal rights activists. The changes will not require new legislation and are aimed at tackling "individuals who foster extremism or hate" - including radical Islamists, neo-Nazis and violent animal rights activists.
But Shadow Home Secretary Dominic Grieve was dismissive of the changes, saying: "This announcement is more spin than substance. The real issue is preventing extremists from coming here, not advertising it after the event. Shadow Home Secretary Dominic Grieve was dismissive of the changes, saying: "This announcement is more spin than substance. The real issue is preventing extremists from coming here, not advertising it after the event.
"If the home secretary is at last committed to applying the powers she has, robustly and consistently, then we welcome it, but why has it taken this government so long?""If the home secretary is at last committed to applying the powers she has, robustly and consistently, then we welcome it, but why has it taken this government so long?"
The measures announced will:
  • create a presumption in favour of exclusion for people who have engaged in fostering, encouraging or spreading extremism and hatred
  • put the burden of proof on individuals to show they have renounced previous extremist views
  • allow for the exclusion of nationals from the European Economic Area before they travel to the UK
  • increase cooperation with other agencies to improve the evidence base underpinning exclusions
  • allow for the "naming and shaming" of excluded people
The measures announced will:
  • create a presumption in favour of exclusion for people who have engaged in fostering, encouraging or spreading extremism and hatred
  • put the burden of proof on individuals to show they have renounced previous extremist views
  • allow for the exclusion of nationals from the European Economic Area before they travel to the UK
  • increase co-operation with other agencies to improve the evidence base underpinning exclusions
  • allow for the "naming and shaming" of excluded people
The measures do not go far enough to according to Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne, who also said naming extremists was a "tawdry gimmick" that could lead to ministers being sued for libel. The measures do not go far enough, according to Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne, who also said naming extremists was a "tawdry gimmick" that could lead to ministers being sued for libel.
HAVE YOUR SAYBar anyone who goes against the British norm and stirs up anti-social behaviour by advocating violent methods to change society. Alan Ward, Sydney, AustraliaSend us your commentsHAVE YOUR SAYBar anyone who goes against the British norm and stirs up anti-social behaviour by advocating violent methods to change society. Alan Ward, Sydney, AustraliaSend us your comments
He said: "It is quite right to exclude anyone whose speech is likely to prove so inflammatory as to provoke violence or racial hatred, but these ideas add nothing since the government has already excluded 79 preachers of hate in three years.He said: "It is quite right to exclude anyone whose speech is likely to prove so inflammatory as to provoke violence or racial hatred, but these ideas add nothing since the government has already excluded 79 preachers of hate in three years.
"The real need is for quiet intelligence to tackle British preachers of hate, and to block hate-filled internet sites."The real need is for quiet intelligence to tackle British preachers of hate, and to block hate-filled internet sites.
"Given the Home Office's track record of error, there must be adequate safeguards and checks to stop the exclusion of innocent people.""Given the Home Office's track record of error, there must be adequate safeguards and checks to stop the exclusion of innocent people."
Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Committee, said there should be tougher measures to help remove foreigners inciting violence who are already based in the UK.Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Committee, said there should be tougher measures to help remove foreigners inciting violence who are already based in the UK.
Patrick Mercer MP and Inayat Bunglawala say the proposals are a "gimmick"Patrick Mercer MP and Inayat Bunglawala say the proposals are a "gimmick"
He said: "Along with being tougher on those wanting to enter the UK we must also get tougher on removing those that are already here.He said: "Along with being tougher on those wanting to enter the UK we must also get tougher on removing those that are already here.
"If they are convicted of inciting violence or related offences, they must be removed.""If they are convicted of inciting violence or related offences, they must be removed."
Mr Vaz also said he was concerned information used to make exclusion decisions needed to be accurate, and that there needed to be a clear process in which to challenge a decision.Mr Vaz also said he was concerned information used to make exclusion decisions needed to be accurate, and that there needed to be a clear process in which to challenge a decision.