This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/oct/05/unilever-scraps-plan-move-london-rotterdam-uk-netherlands

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Unilever scraps plan to move HQ from London to Rotterdam Unilever scraps plan to move HQ from London to Rotterdam
(about 2 hours later)
Unilever has bowed to shareholder pressure and scrapped plans to move its corporate headquarters from London to Rotterdam. Unilever has abandoned a controversial plan to move its headquarters from London to Rotterdam in the face of an unprecedented rebellion from its British shareholders.
The consumer goods giant said on Friday it was withdrawing a proposal to “simplify” its dual-headed Anglo-Dutch legal structure, which would have moved its corporate base to the Netherlands. The climbdown, just three weeks before the shareholder votes, is a major blow to the credibility of its top executives, chairman Marijn Dekkers and chief executive Paul Polman, both Dutchmen who had lobbied hard for a relocation they insisted was not linked to Brexit.
The announcement followed dissent from several major shareholders over the past few weeks, including Royal London, Columbia Threadneedle, Legal & General Investment Management, Aviva Investors, Lindsell Train, M&G Investments and Brewin Dolphin. The decision was met with a chorus of approval from shareholders. “We are pleased they have abandoned the plan to ‘go Dutch’,” said Ali Miremadi, portfolio manager at Swiss asset manager GAM, who intended to vote against the move. “Now the company can put its focus into the core job, driving long-term shareholder value.” 
Unilever said: “We have had an extensive period of engagement with shareholders and have received widespread support for the principle behind simplification. Iain Richards, head of responsible investment at Columbia Threadneedle Investments, which was also against the move, welcomed the change of heart: “Better approaches are possible and the problems for shareholders were foreseeable.”
“However, we recognise that the proposal has not received support from a significant group of shareholders and therefore consider it appropriate to withdraw.” Royal London Asset Management, said the board had “listened to shareholder concerns...We are pleased we and other UK investors can now share in the future growth of the company.” 
Had the move gone ahead, Unilever’s shares were unlikely to have continued trading on the FTSE 100. British investors were worried that once Unilever, which is Britain’s fourth largest company, shifted its domicile to the Netherlands, it would have been ejected the FTSE 100. This would have forced funds that track the FTSE 100, as well as many active funds, to sell their shares. At least 10 shareholders, who together owned a 12% stake in Unilever, publicly spoke out against the move as they were worried it
The chairman, Marijn Dekkers, said the board continued to believe structural simplification was in the firm’s best interests. Unilever went to great lengths to sell the plan, holding more than 200 meetings with investors and taking out full-page adverts in the press. In a statement the company said that after extensive consultation the proposal had not received support from a significant group of shareholders and therefore it was “appropriate to withdraw”.
“Unilever has built a long track record of consistent and competitive performance,” he said. “The board continues to believe that simplifying our dual-headed structure would, over time, provide opportunities to further accelerate value creation and serve the best long-term interests of Unilever. The chairman, Marijn Dekkers, said the board continued to believe overhauling the complicated structure – which is a hangover from Unilever’s formation through the merger of a Dutch margarine and a British soap maker 89 years ago – was in the firm’s best interests.
“The board will now consider its next steps and will continue to engage with our shareholders. We will proceed with the plan to cancel the NV [Dutch limited company] preference shares, further strengthening our corporate governance.” “The board continues to believe that simplifying our dual-headed structure would, over time, provide opportunities to further accelerate value creation and serve the best long-term interests of Unilever,” said Dekkers. “The board will now consider its next steps and will continue to engage with our shareholders.”
Unilever first announced plans to simplify the business from two legal entities into a single one, incorporated in Rotterdam, in March. Unilever first announced plans to simplify the business from two legal entities into a single one, incorporated in Rotterdam, in March. It dealt a major blow to the UK government and its efforts to uphold Britain’s status as a centre for business after Brexit.
It dealt a major blow to the UK government and its efforts to uphold Britain’s status as a centre for business after Brexit.
However, Unilever has throughout insisted the move to Rotterdam was “nothing to do with Brexit”. It also said at the time that its 7,300 workers in the UK and 3,100 in the Netherlands would remain unaffected by the changes.However, Unilever has throughout insisted the move to Rotterdam was “nothing to do with Brexit”. It also said at the time that its 7,300 workers in the UK and 3,100 in the Netherlands would remain unaffected by the changes.
Unilever, which is behind well-known household brands such as Ben & Jerry’s ice-cream, Persil and Lipton teas, employs about 169,000 people worldwide. Last year Unilever knocked back a £115bn bid from Kraft and although the stated aim was to make it more efficient and agile in a consumer market rocked by e-commerce and upstart rivals, the Netherlands appeared to offer a safer harbour from corporate raiders. The debacle means question marks now hang over the future of Polman, who was due to expected to step down next year, and Dekkers, who is two years into his stint as chairman.
The business secretary, Greg Clark, welcomed the decision to scrap the move. “Unilever has a long and proud history in the UK and I welcome this decision by Unilever’s board having listened to its shareholders.” Unilever needed a 75% majority of the UK votes cast at this month’s poll but also a simple majority among all UK shareholders by number. But with the chorus of disapproval growing louder by the day, Polman is said to have agreed to scrap the plan during a call early on Friday after it became clear that it could fall short of the approval needed.
“There was a real suspicion that… part of the motive for the move was that UK rules too easily allow takeovers,” said Rachel Reeves, Labour MP and chair of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy committee. “As a committee, we will want to consider looking at the government’s white paper on foreign takeovers to see whether the new regime should include additional safeguards.”
Unilever, which also owns Ben & Jerry’s ice-cream, Persil and Lipton teas, employs about 169,000 people worldwide. The business secretary, Greg Clark, welcomed the decision to scrap the move. “Unilever has a long and proud history in the UK and I welcome this decision by Unilever’s board having listened to its shareholders.
Clark added: “The UK is one of the best places in the world to grow a business, and our modern industrial strategy commits us to being an open and competitive economy, and a great place to locate global headquarters.”Clark added: “The UK is one of the best places in the world to grow a business, and our modern industrial strategy commits us to being an open and competitive economy, and a great place to locate global headquarters.”
UnileverUnilever
Corporate governanceCorporate governance
NetherlandsNetherlands
EuropeEurope
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content