This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/oct/03/trump-temporary-protected-status-immigration-judge

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
US judge blocks Trump administration from ending key immigrant protections US judge blocks Trump administration from ending key immigrant protections
(about 11 hours later)
A judge has blocked the Trump administration from ending protections that let immigrants from four countries live and work legally in the United States, saying the move would cause “irreparable harm and great hardship”.A judge has blocked the Trump administration from ending protections that let immigrants from four countries live and work legally in the United States, saying the move would cause “irreparable harm and great hardship”.
The US district judge Edward Chen in San Francisco granted a request for a preliminary injunction against the administration’s decision to discontinue temporary protected status for people from Sudan, Nicaragua, Haiti and El Salvador.The US district judge Edward Chen in San Francisco granted a request for a preliminary injunction against the administration’s decision to discontinue temporary protected status for people from Sudan, Nicaragua, Haiti and El Salvador.
The status is granted to countries ravaged by natural disasters or war and lets citizens of those countries remain in the US until the situation improves back home. About 300,000 people have received those protections.The status is granted to countries ravaged by natural disasters or war and lets citizens of those countries remain in the US until the situation improves back home. About 300,000 people have received those protections.
The ruling said the government failed to show the harm of continuing the 20-year-old program and the plaintiffs established that uprooting those immigrants could hurt the local and national economy.The ruling said the government failed to show the harm of continuing the 20-year-old program and the plaintiffs established that uprooting those immigrants could hurt the local and national economy.
“Beneficiaries who have lived, worked, and raised families in the United States (many for more than a decade), will be subject to removal,” Chen wrote.“Beneficiaries who have lived, worked, and raised families in the United States (many for more than a decade), will be subject to removal,” Chen wrote.
Many have children who were born in the US and may be faced with the choice of “bringing their children with them (and tearing them away from the only country and community they have known) or splitting their families apart,” the ruling said.Many have children who were born in the US and may be faced with the choice of “bringing their children with them (and tearing them away from the only country and community they have known) or splitting their families apart,” the ruling said.
Homeland security officials said they could not comment on ongoing litigation.Homeland security officials said they could not comment on ongoing litigation.
A lawsuit alleges the administration’s decision was motivated by racism and cites Trump’s reported vulgar reference to African countries during a meeting about immigration at the White House in January.A lawsuit alleges the administration’s decision was motivated by racism and cites Trump’s reported vulgar reference to African countries during a meeting about immigration at the White House in January.
Chen questioned the administration’s motives at a hearing last month. He cited a memo that he said suggested the decision was driven by the administration’s “America first” policy.Chen questioned the administration’s motives at a hearing last month. He cited a memo that he said suggested the decision was driven by the administration’s “America first” policy.
He asked an attorney for the US justice department to respond to plaintiffs’ allegations that “America first” meant excluding immigrants who are not white.He asked an attorney for the US justice department to respond to plaintiffs’ allegations that “America first” meant excluding immigrants who are not white.
Adam Kirschner, a government attorney, said the memo showed the then acting homeland security secretary Elaine Duke grappling with what to do about temporary protected status. Kirschner said input from the White House was expected on an issue like this, but the final decision was Duke’s. Adam Kirschner, a government attorney, said the memo showed the then acting homeland security secretary, Elaine Duke, grappling with what to do about temporary protected status. Kirschner said input from the White House was expected on an issue like this, but the final decision was Duke’s.
Chen repeated Trump’s vulgar comment about African countries while responding that any influence the White House had on Duke could be relevant to the claims that the administration’s moves were discriminatory.Chen repeated Trump’s vulgar comment about African countries while responding that any influence the White House had on Duke could be relevant to the claims that the administration’s moves were discriminatory.
El Salvador was designated for the program in 2001 after an earthquake, and the country’s status was repeatedly renewed. The Trump administration announced in January that the program would expire for El Salvador in September 2019.El Salvador was designated for the program in 2001 after an earthquake, and the country’s status was repeatedly renewed. The Trump administration announced in January that the program would expire for El Salvador in September 2019.
The administration concluded that El Salvador had received significant international aid to recover from the earthquake, and homes, schools and hospitals there had been rebuilt.The administration concluded that El Salvador had received significant international aid to recover from the earthquake, and homes, schools and hospitals there had been rebuilt.
The Trump administration ended the program for the other three countries as well.The Trump administration ended the program for the other three countries as well.
More than 200,000 immigrants could face deportation because of the change, and they have more than 200,000 American children who risk being uprooted, according to plaintiffs in the lawsuit.More than 200,000 immigrants could face deportation because of the change, and they have more than 200,000 American children who risk being uprooted, according to plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
US immigrationUS immigration
Trump administrationTrump administration
San FranciscoSan Francisco
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content