This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/world/americas/7683359.stm

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Security fears 'erode free press' Security fears 'erode free press'
(about 6 hours later)
The media watchdog, Reporters Without Borders (RSF), says democracy does not necessarily guarantee a free press, with security worries eroding freedoms. Security worries can erode freedoms even in democratic nations and undermine press freedom, media watchdog Reporters Without Borders (RSF) says.
RSF cited the poor showing by the US and Israel, and urged US politicians to improve the situation. The warning comes as the group publishes its annual 173-nation index of press freedom around the world.
The warning coincides with the publication of the group's annual global index of press freedom. RSF cited poor rankings by the US and Israel, and called for US political leaders to improve its situation.
Iceland was top and the US 36th. The bottom three countries on the list were North Korea, Turkmenistan and Eritrea. Iceland topped the list while the US was 36th. North Korea, Turkmenistan and Eritrea were the lowest-ranked nations.
Paris-based Reporters without Borders described these three as "unchanging hells in which the population is cut off from the world and is subjected to propaganda worthy of a bygone age". The Paris-based press freedom body described those three countries as "unchanging hells" in which the population is cut off from the world and is subjected to "propaganda worthy of a bygone age".
Political interferencePolitical interference
It is peace rather than economic prosperity that guarantees the greatest press freedom, the rights group said. Yet it is peace rather than economic prosperity is the greatest guarantee of press freedom, RSF said.
While parliamentary democracies not engaged in any war did well, others including the US and Israel helped to erode a free press, the report said. While parliamentary democracies not engaged in any war did well, others - including the US and Israel - fare less well, the report said.
Dominating the top 20 of the global index were European states, in particular Nordic countries such as Iceland, Norway and Finland. PRESS FREEDOM LIST 2008 Top 1: Iceland2: Luxembourg2: Norway4: Estonia4: Finland Bottom 169: Cuba170: Burma171: Turkmenistan172: North Korea173: Eritrea
Some of the newer democracies, including Estonia, Latvia and Slovakia, featured in the top 10. Britain was 23rd. Although the US rose from its 2007 position of 48th to be ranked 36th, Israel fell two positions to 46th in the list.
Some African countries were higher up the index than in previous years, such as Namibia, Ghana and Mali. They rated better than Spain and Italy, which the report says have slipped because of political or Mafia interference. The group has written to US presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain highlighting the need for more protection for reporters' confidential sources.
China still languished in the bottom 10 - despite it being Olympics year - just worse than Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan, Zimbabwe and Iran, although not quite as bad as Burma. It also urged the two candidates to push for better working conditions for reporters in areas under US control in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The data was compiled for the year ending 1 September. "We sincerely hope that we can look to your administration for change from the policies of secrecy, ambiguity and avoidance that have hampered the work of a free press," RSF wrote to the presidential hopefuls.
The US has slipped from 111th to 119th in the rankings of press freedom enjoyed outside its territory, a position blamed on the ongoing conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Georgia ranks noticeably lower than in 2007, tumbling 54 places to 120th in the aftermath of its war with Russia during the summer.
But peaceful, democratic countries dominate the top 20 of the global index were European states, in particular Nordic countries such as Iceland, Norway and Finland.
Some of the newer democracies, including Estonia, Latvia and Slovakia, featured in the top 10. The UK was 23rd.
Some African countries fared better than in previous years, among them Namibia, Ghana and Mali. They rated better than Spain and Italy, which the report says have slipped because of political and Mafia interference.
China still languishes in the bottom 10 - despite hosting the 2008 Olympics - just worse than Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan, Zimbabwe and Iran, although not quite as bad as Burma.
The data was compiled for the year ending 1 September 2008.