This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7671787.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Police 'could kill without order' Officer 'felt sorry for marksmen'
(about 2 hours later)
Firearms officers were prepared to kill a man they thought was one of the failed London bombers without orders from their seniors, an inquest heard. A firearms officer told an inquest he "felt sorry" for police marksmen left covered in blood after shooting dead Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes.
An anonymous inspector told the inquest of Jean Charles de Menezes they were ready to act if senior officers could not make the "career-threatening" move. The anonymous officer said his team had been prepared to kill, even if their senior officer had not given the order for fear of jeopardising her career.
The inquest heard Brazilian Mr de Menezes, 27, was killed in a "calm and controlled" way as he got on the tube. The inquest also heard the 27-year-old had been killed in a "calm and controlled" way as he got on the Tube.
Police had mistaken him for a suspect in the attempted 21 July 2005 attacks. Police mistook the Brazilian for one of the failed 21 July 2005 London bombers.
The senior tactical adviser, codenamed Trojan 84, told the hearing that officers were ready to take a "critical" shot. The officer, a senior tactical adviser codenamed Trojan 84, told the jury he had met the two officers shortly after they shot Mr de Menezes seven times from point blank range.
The inspector, whose identity was protected during the inquest, told how he briefed the marksmen who shot dead Mr de Menezes, who was mistaken for failed bombing suspect Hussain Osman. Describing the meeting, in a tunnel at Stockwell Underground station, south London, he said: "I just remember feeling sorry for them at that point.
His designated senior officer (DSO) on the day in question, had been Deputy Assistant Commissioner Cressida Dick. "The reason for that was because they were covered in blood."
'Prepared to shoot' 'A tragedy'
Giving evidence for the first time in open court, he said: "We felt that for any DSO to make a decision about a critical shot was a hugely difficult decision to make and maybe career-threatening. Mr de Menezes had been mistaken for failed bombing suspect Hussain Osman.
The officer, an inspector whose identity was protected during the inquest, described it as a "tragedy".
"We thought we had caught a suicide bomber - it turned out we had killed an innocent man," he said.
Trojan 84 had briefed the marksman that morning and told them there were circumstances in which they could shoot without orders, the inquest heard.
It is the training that enables us to carry out the duties as happened on this day in a calm and controlled manner Ch Insp Vince Esposito
Their designated senior officer that day (DSO) had been Deputy Assistant Commissioner Cressida Dick.
The officer said: "We felt that for any DSO to make a decision about a critical shot was a hugely difficult decision to make and maybe career-threatening.
"In relation to the critical shot, the instruction would come direct from the DSO but what I also mentioned was that if we were able to challenge, but the subject was not-compliant, then a shot may be taken.""In relation to the critical shot, the instruction would come direct from the DSO but what I also mentioned was that if we were able to challenge, but the subject was not-compliant, then a shot may be taken."
When asked if officers were prepared to take the critical shot without word from his bosses, he replied: "Yes."When asked if officers were prepared to take the critical shot without word from his bosses, he replied: "Yes."
He added: "It was my job to tell the team they would be supported whatever decision they took because of the structures that were in place."He added: "It was my job to tell the team they would be supported whatever decision they took because of the structures that were in place."
'Extreme circumstances''Extreme circumstances'
Earlier, tactical adviser Ch Insp Vince Esposito had spoken about how Mr de Menezes had been shot as he boarded a train at Stockwell station on the day after the failed bombings. Earlier, tactical adviser Ch Insp Vince Esposito had spoken about how Mr de Menezes had been shot as he boarded a train on the day after the failed bombings.
He said: "Everybody is human and we all get excited occasionally but it is the training that enables us to carry out the duties as happened on this day in a calm and controlled manner."He said: "Everybody is human and we all get excited occasionally but it is the training that enables us to carry out the duties as happened on this day in a calm and controlled manner."
Ch Insp Esposito, who said armed intervention was used in only the most "extreme" circumstances, said Mr de Menezes would have been shot on that day whether he had been carrying a rucksack or not.Ch Insp Esposito, who said armed intervention was used in only the most "extreme" circumstances, said Mr de Menezes would have been shot on that day whether he had been carrying a rucksack or not.
When asked if explosives could have been concealed on Mr de Menezes's body or in his pockets, he said: "It is very difficult indeed to say if he was carrying an explosive device."When asked if explosives could have been concealed on Mr de Menezes's body or in his pockets, he said: "It is very difficult indeed to say if he was carrying an explosive device."
The experienced firearms officer joined the Metropolitan force in 1980 and helped Scotland Yard develop tactics to deal with suicide bombers.
He told the jury there had been an increased police presence on London transport networks after four bombs exploded, killing 52 innocent people, on 7 July 2005.
But he said firearms officers had not been routinely deployed because they were busy on other operations.
The inquest continues.The inquest continues.