This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/14/ben-stokes-trial-cleared-affray-brawl-outside-bristol-nightclub-england-cricketer

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Ben Stokes cleared of affray after brawl outside Bristol club Ben Stokes cleared of affray after brawl outside Bristol club
(about 3 hours later)
The England cricketer Ben Stokes has been cleared of affray after a fight outside a Bristol nightclub. The England cricketer Ben Stokes tilted his head back and shut his eyes in a restrained display of relief after being found not guilty of affray following a late-night street brawl in Bristol last September.
Following almost two and a half hours of deliberation, a jury of six men and six women at Bristol crown court acquitted the Durham all-rounder after he gave evidence saying he had acted in self-defence. Immediately after the verdict was read out, Stokes leaned across the dock to shake hands with his co-defendant, Ryan Ali, who was found not guilty of the same charge. A jury of six men and six women listened to around 30 hours of testimony and submissions during six days of evidence, returning a unanimous verdict after just two-and-a-half hours of deliberations.
Stokes was on trial alongside Ryan Ali, 28, whom he was alleged to have punched unconscious in the brawl near Mbargo nightclub in the early hours of 25 September last year. Ali was cleared of the same charge. Stokes squeezed the waist of his wife, Clare Ratcliffe, who wiped away tears, as the pair left courtroom 1 at Bristol crown court for the final time, after what the sportsman described as an 11-month ordeal. The atmosphere was one of measured celebration as Ali also shook hands with Ratcliffe and Stokes’ agent, Neil Fairbrother, a former cricketer himself.
A third man, Ryan Hale, 27, was acquitted of the charge last Thursday on the directions of the judge, Peter Blair QC. The lawyer Paul Lunt read a statement on behalf of Stokes on the street outside the court as the 27-year-old stood in the background, stony faced, refusing to answer questions posed to him by TV reporters and offering no apology for the incident.
Stokes, 27, displayed little emotion as the verdict was read out on Tuesday, but his wife, Clare Ratcliffe, who was at his side throughout the seven-day trial, wiped away tears. “The jury’s decision that Ben is not guilty fairly reflects the truth of what happened in Bristol that night,” Lunt said, “This has been a very difficult period for Ben. He’s had to maintain his silence at times when many on social media and certain parts of the press predetermined his guilt long before the trial began. Now that the trial is over, Ben is keen to get back to cricket being his sole focus.”
The cricketer maintained throughout the trial that he had stepped in to defend two men, whom he claimed were the target of homophobic abuse by Ali and Hale, which was denied. Stokes alleged that Ali, who was holding a bottle, had replied: “Shut the fuck up or I’ll bottle you.” Stokes lost his England vice-captaincy and a place on an Ashes tour after footage of the fight, which left two men unconscious, was published by a newspaper website in the aftermath of his arrest. He has now been reinstated to the England squad and is free to play in the third Test against India, which begins at Nottingham’s Trent Bridge ground on Saturday.
Stokes told the jury: “All my actions were in self-defence and fearing for my safety.” But it can be revealed that the Crown Prosecution Service was criticised after making a belated and unsuccessful attempt to have the charge faced by Stokes upgraded. On the first day of the trial, which began last Monday, the prosecutor, Nicholas Corsellis, requested permission to add two counts of assault to the indictment. But the judge, Peter Blair QC, the Recorder of Bristol, rejected the application. He said if the new charges had been added in February, it was “hard to see how the defence could have objected”, but that Stokes’ legal team had prepared for a trial on an affray charge and should not be ambushed with a last-minute change.
His lawyer, Gordon Cole QC, told jurors it was up to the prosecution to prove Stokes had not acted in self-defence, but there were gaps in the evidence that should cause the jury to be “massively concerned”. The CPS were also criticised for not prosecuting Stokes’ teammate Alex Hales, who can be seen on CCTV kicking the Afghanistan veteran Ryan Hale in the head while he lay on the floor injured. Hales was questioned under caution but never arrested. With the jury absent, Stephen Mooney, representing Hale, told the judge: “I struggle to understand how the Crown, in adopting the stance they have, have come to the conclusion that overt acts of direct violence used by an individual to someone on the floor is not worthy of prosecution.”
He said Stokes had been consistent that he had acted in self-defence from the moment of his arrest, which happened after a night out with his teammates after England’s victory over the West Indies in a one-day match in the city. Stokes was arrested in the early hours of 25 September last year after a night out with England teammates to celebrate victory over the West Indies in an international match earlier in the day. He had been identified by an off-duty police officer as the “main aggressor” in a fight which left the firefighter and former nightclub bouncer Ali with a broken eye socket and blood pouring from his face.
Bristol crown court heard the incident described as “a sustained episode of significant violence” from Stokes, who had “lost control”. But Stokes’ defence remained unchanged throughout. He told the jury he had “stepped in” to defend two gay men who were being verbally abused, but then had to defend himself from Ali, 28, and Hale, 27, who were threatening violence. Ali was wielding a beer bottle held upside down by its stem, he said.
William O’Connor and Kai Barry, a gay couple from Bristol, who Stokes described as “camp”, did not give evidence to the trial but yesterday spoke in defence of the Durham cricketer.
Barry said that the incident had begun because “someone came across the road and tried to hit me with a bottle”.
O’Connor told ITV news: “Stokes could see the people doing what they were doing, and how homophobic they were and how nasty they came across.”
Barry added: “I thought he was just a normal lad, you know, sticking up for someone who was weaker than he was, which was quite nice. When I realised who he was, I thought fair play, because he’s obviously put his career at risk for someone that he never knew.”
O’Connor added: “We are really thankful for what he has done because Kai could have been left with a scar.”
The jury heard Stokes had no recollection of hitting Ali and could not remember what was said during the alleged homophobic abuse. He had denied being drunk, but told the jury he had had three to four beers, six vodka and lemonades and “a few Jägerbombs”.The jury heard Stokes had no recollection of hitting Ali and could not remember what was said during the alleged homophobic abuse. He had denied being drunk, but told the jury he had had three to four beers, six vodka and lemonades and “a few Jägerbombs”.
Ali, who sustained a fractured eye socket – the court was told he continued to have problems with his vision – denied there had been homophobic abuse. He said there had been “just banter” with the two men before he saw Stokes charging towards him in the street.
Stokes’ lawyer, Paul Lunt, had questioned if his client had been the focus of the prosecution because of his status.
After the verdict Lunt read out a statement on the cricketer’s behalf, saying the verdict was a fair reflection of events that night.
“On 25 September, Ben had been out with teammates celebrating an England win. Contrary to some reports, there was no curfew in place,” he said. “Ben was minding his own business when he came across two men who were subject to what Ben identified as serious homophobic abuse.
“It was only when others came under threat that Ben became physically engaged with the men in question. The steps that he took were solely aimed at ensuring the safety of himself and the others present.”
Tony Miles, the solicitor for Ali and Hale, said: “Both our clients are delighted it’s all over. They just want to get on with their lives.”
An Avon and Somerset police spokesman said: “We carried out a thorough independent investigation into the events of 25 September before passing a comprehensive file of evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service [CPS], which subsequently made the decision to charge.An Avon and Somerset police spokesman said: “We carried out a thorough independent investigation into the events of 25 September before passing a comprehensive file of evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service [CPS], which subsequently made the decision to charge.
“Having reviewed the evidence, the jury has concluded the actions of the defendants did not amount to affray and we respect this decision.”“Having reviewed the evidence, the jury has concluded the actions of the defendants did not amount to affray and we respect this decision.”
The two men who were allegedly subjected to homophobic abuse, Kai Barry and William O’Connor, did not give evidence and no statements were read from them during the trial.
A CPS spokeswoman said: “The evidence of Mr O’Connor and Mr Barry was disclosed to the defence, but it was not deemed necessary to call them as witnesses in the case.”
Ben StokesBen Stokes
BristolBristol
CricketCricket
England cricket teamEngland cricket team
DurhamDurham
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content