This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/aug/10/epa-staff-agency-new-rules-asbestos-emails
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| EPA staff opposed agency’s new rules on asbestos use, emails reveal | EPA staff opposed agency’s new rules on asbestos use, emails reveal |
| (4 months later) | |
| The Environmental Protection Agency’s own staffers objected to a controversial new US rule governing the use of cancer-causing asbestos, according to internal emails. | The Environmental Protection Agency’s own staffers objected to a controversial new US rule governing the use of cancer-causing asbestos, according to internal emails. |
| EPA ordered to ban pesticide linked to learning disabilities | |
| The rule, issued in June, would require manufacturers to receive EPA approval before importing or manufacturing asbestos for certain purposes. The highly technical regulation has prompted controversy, with the agency saying it more tightly regulates asbestos, but critics saying it could allow the substance to be more widely used in America. | The rule, issued in June, would require manufacturers to receive EPA approval before importing or manufacturing asbestos for certain purposes. The highly technical regulation has prompted controversy, with the agency saying it more tightly regulates asbestos, but critics saying it could allow the substance to be more widely used in America. |
| Many developed nations ban asbestos altogether, but the United States has restrictions that fall short of an outright ban. | Many developed nations ban asbestos altogether, but the United States has restrictions that fall short of an outright ban. |
| Internal emails obtained by the New York Times show that staffers at the EPA objected to the provisions. | Internal emails obtained by the New York Times show that staffers at the EPA objected to the provisions. |
| “The new approach raises significant concerns about the potential health impacts,” policy analyst Sharon Cooperstein wrote in one of the e-mails. | “The new approach raises significant concerns about the potential health impacts,” policy analyst Sharon Cooperstein wrote in one of the e-mails. |
| The new rule identifies 15 uses of asbestos that require approval, instead of requiring a review for all new uses. | The new rule identifies 15 uses of asbestos that require approval, instead of requiring a review for all new uses. |
| The staffers worried that could allow companies to get away with using asbestos in ways the agency did not list. | The staffers worried that could allow companies to get away with using asbestos in ways the agency did not list. |
| “This new approach allows asbestos-containing products that are not currently used to be used in the future. There are many uses of asbestos beyond the 15 identified,” wrote Mark Seltzer, an EPA attorney, in another email published by the Times, adding the approach “hampers enforcement, compliance, and information gathering”. | “This new approach allows asbestos-containing products that are not currently used to be used in the future. There are many uses of asbestos beyond the 15 identified,” wrote Mark Seltzer, an EPA attorney, in another email published by the Times, adding the approach “hampers enforcement, compliance, and information gathering”. |
| Robert Courtnage, an associate chief in the agency’s Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, wrote that it was “upper management” that ordered the new approach, against the recommendations of staff. | Robert Courtnage, an associate chief in the agency’s Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, wrote that it was “upper management” that ordered the new approach, against the recommendations of staff. |
| An EPA spokesman told the Times that the staffers, like outside critics, did not fully understand the proposal. | An EPA spokesman told the Times that the staffers, like outside critics, did not fully understand the proposal. |
| Friday is the last day for the public to submit comments on the plan, before it is finalized later this year. | Friday is the last day for the public to submit comments on the plan, before it is finalized later this year. |
| US Environmental Protection Agency | US Environmental Protection Agency |
| US politics | US politics |
| news | news |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |